Evaluation of potential sex differences in the subjective and analgesic effects of morphine in normal, healthy volunteers

被引:41
作者
Comer, Sandra D. [1 ]
Cooper, Ziva D. [1 ]
Kowalczyk, William J. [1 ]
Sullivan, Maria A. [1 ]
Evans, Suzette M. [1 ]
Bisaga, Adam M. [1 ]
Vosburg, Suzanne K. [1 ]
机构
[1] Columbia Univ, Coll Phys & Surg, New York State Psychiat Inst, Dept Psychiat,Div Subst Abuse, New York, NY 10032 USA
关键词
Sex differences; Morphine; Pain; Subjective effects; Opioids; Humans; COLD-WATER STIMULUS; OPIOID ANTINOCICEPTION; EXPERIMENTAL PAIN; GENDER-DIFFERENCES; WORKING-MEMORY; CARDIOVASCULAR-RESPONSES; COGNITIVE IMPAIRMENT; PRESSOR PAIN; COCAINE USE; HUMANS;
D O I
10.1007/s00213-009-1703-4
中图分类号
Q189 [神经科学];
学科分类号
071006 ;
摘要
Sex differences in the analgesic effects of mu-opioid agonists have been documented extensively in rodents and, to a lesser extent, in non-human primates. To date, there have been few experimental studies investigating this effect in humans, and the conclusions have been equivocal. The aims of the present study were to examine potential sex differences in the analgesic, subjective, performance, and physiological effects of morphine in human research volunteers. Using a double-blind outpatient procedure, the present study investigated the effects of intramuscular morphine (0, 5, and 10 mg/70 kg, i.m.) in men (N = 8) and women (N = 10). The primary dependent measure was analgesia, as assessed by the cold pressor and mechanical pressure tests. Secondary dependent measures included subjective, performance, and physiological effects of morphine, as well as plasma levels of morphine. No differences in the analgesic and performance effects of morphine were observed between men and women, but significant differences in morphine's subjective effects were found. Specifically, men reported greater positive effects, whereas women reported greater negative effects after morphine administration. These data suggest that, in humans, there are sex differences in the subjective mood-altering effects of morphine but, based on this limited sample, there is little evidence for sex differences in its analgesic effects.
引用
收藏
页码:45 / 55
页数:11
相关论文
共 60 条
[1]   Low efficacy opioids: Implications for sex differences in opioid antinociception [J].
Barrett, AC .
EXPERIMENTAL AND CLINICAL PSYCHOPHARMACOLOGY, 2006, 14 (01) :1-11
[2]   Sex-related differences in mechanical nociception and antinociception produced by μ- and κ-opioid receptor agonists in rats [J].
Barrett, AC ;
Smith, ES ;
Picker, MJ .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF PHARMACOLOGY, 2002, 452 (02) :163-173
[3]  
Berdine Hildegarde J, 2006, J Pain Palliat Care Pharmacother, V20, P79, DOI 10.1300/J354v20n04_16
[4]   Response to morphine in male and female patients: Analgesia and adverse events [J].
Bijur, Polly E. ;
Esses, David ;
Birnbaum, Adrienne ;
Chang, Andrew K. ;
Schechter, Clyde ;
Gallagher, E. John .
CLINICAL JOURNAL OF PAIN, 2008, 24 (03) :192-198
[5]   RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN MORPHINE AND ETONITAZENE-INDUCED WORKING-MEMORY IMPAIRMENT AND ANALGESIA [J].
BRAIDA, D ;
GORI, E ;
SALA, M .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF PHARMACOLOGY, 1994, 271 (2-3) :497-504
[6]   MEASUREMENTS OF HUMAN PRESSURE-PAIN THRESHOLDS ON FINGERS AND TOES [J].
BRENNUM, J ;
KJELDSEN, M ;
JENSEN, K ;
JENSEN, TS .
PAIN, 1989, 38 (02) :211-217
[7]   Side effects of opioids during short-term administration: Effect of age, gender, and race [J].
Cepeda, MS ;
Farrar, JT ;
Baumgarten, M ;
Boston, R ;
Carr, DB ;
Strom, BL .
CLINICAL PHARMACOLOGY & THERAPEUTICS, 2003, 74 (02) :102-112
[8]   HUMAN PAIN RESPONSIVITY IN A TONIC PAIN MODEL - PSYCHOLOGICAL DETERMINANTS [J].
CHEN, ACN ;
DWORKIN, SF ;
HAUG, J ;
GEHRIG, J .
PAIN, 1989, 37 (02) :143-160
[9]   Gender differences in pressure pain threshold in healthy humans [J].
Chesterton, LS ;
Barlasb, P ;
Foster, NE ;
Baxter, GD ;
Wright, CC .
PAIN, 2003, 101 (03) :259-266
[10]   Gender and pain upon movement are associated with the requirements for postoperative patient-controlled iv analgesia:: a prospective survey of 2,298 Chinese patients [J].
Chia, YY ;
Chow, LH ;
Hung, CC ;
Liu, K ;
Ger, LP ;
Wang, PN .
CANADIAN JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIA-JOURNAL CANADIEN D ANESTHESIE, 2002, 49 (03) :249-255