Growth projections against set-target of renewable energy and resultant impact on emissions reduction in India

被引:16
作者
Chabhadiya, Karan [1 ]
Srivastava, Rajiv Ranjan [2 ]
Pathak, Pankaj [3 ]
机构
[1] Marwadi Univ, Dept Environm Sci & Engn, Rajkot 360003, Gujarat, India
[2] Duy Tan Univ, Ctr Adv Chem, Inst Res & Dev, Da Nang 550000, Vietnam
[3] SRM Univ AP, Dept Environm Sci, Amravati 522502, Andhra Pradesh, India
关键词
Alternative energy; COP21; Greenhouse emissions; Indian energy growth scenario; Sustainable development;
D O I
10.4491/eer.2020.083
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
In accordance with the Paris Climate Agreement (COP21) and Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs), India is greatly focused on deployment of renewable energy (RE) for supplementing the energy requirements of the country. The present article assesses the validity of the promises offered by RE technologies in India and its necessary action to understand the gap between setting goals and the ground situation, which can also show a pathway to other developing countries. Therefore, the long-term projection perspectives on RE growth have been made using the India Energy Security Scenario-2047. In order to achieve the set target for emissions reduction of greenhouse gases (GHGs) i.e., 1209 MT CO2e in support of SDGs to the 2005 level by 2030, three renewable growth scenarios have been tested for transitioning the Indian energy system. Accordingly, the regression analysis reveals that the most desirable growth scenario will require a steady rise of RE contribution in the overall energy mix of India by 2030 from the current similar to 21% to 68% of the installed capacity. In this view, the present study highlights the exploration of new alternatives in long-term energy planning, and less on one-sided scenario to achieve the emissions' reduction target.
引用
收藏
页数:11
相关论文
共 77 条
  • [21] Central Electricity Authority,, ANN REPORTS 2016
  • [22] Measuring significant variability characteristics: An assessment of three UK renewables
    Coker, Phil
    Barlow, Janet
    Cockerill, Tim
    Shipworth, David
    [J]. RENEWABLE ENERGY, 2013, 53 : 111 - 120
  • [23] Microalgal Biorefineries for Bioenergy Production: Can We Move from Concept to Industrial Reality?
    Depra, Mariany C.
    dos Santos, Aline M.
    Severo, Ihana A.
    Santos, Andrieli B.
    Zepka, Leila Q.
    Jacob-Lopes, Eduardo
    [J]. BIOENERGY RESEARCH, 2018, 11 (04) : 727 - 747
  • [24] Renewable energy resources: Current status, future prospects and their enabling technology
    Ellabban, Omar
    Abu-Rub, Haitham
    Blaabjerg, Frede
    [J]. RENEWABLE & SUSTAINABLE ENERGY REVIEWS, 2014, 39 : 748 - 764
  • [25] Energetica India, 2015, KMPG REPORT
  • [26] EnergyNext, 2017, SMALL HYDROPOWER IND
  • [27] Offsetting Greenhouse Gas Emissions in the Himalaya? Clean Development Dams in Himachal Pradesh, India
    Erlewein, Alexander
    Nuesser, Marcus
    [J]. MOUNTAIN RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT, 2011, 31 (04) : 293 - 304
  • [28] Health effects of wind turbines on humans in residential settings: Results of a scoping review
    Freiberg, Alice
    Schefter, Christiane
    Girbig, Maria
    Murta, Vanise C.
    Seidler, Andreas
    [J]. ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH, 2019, 169 : 446 - 463
  • [29] Bioenergy with carbon capture and storage (BECCS): Global potential, investment preferences, and deployment barriers
    Fridahl, Mathias
    Lehtveer, Mariliis
    [J]. ENERGY RESEARCH & SOCIAL SCIENCE, 2018, 42 : 155 - 165
  • [30] Transportation in a 100% renewable energy system
    Garcia-Olivares, Antonio
    Sole, Jordi
    Osychenko, Oleg
    [J]. ENERGY CONVERSION AND MANAGEMENT, 2018, 158 : 266 - 285