FERTILITY AND SOCIAL SECURITY

被引:69
作者
Boldrin, Michele [1 ,2 ]
De Nardi, Mariacristina [3 ,4 ,5 ,6 ,7 ]
Jones, Larry E. [7 ,8 ,9 ]
机构
[1] Washington Univ, St Louis, MO USA
[2] Fed Reserve Bank St Louis, St Louis, MO USA
[3] UCL, London, England
[4] Fed Reserve Bank Chicago, Chicago, IL USA
[5] IFS, London, England
[6] CfM, London, England
[7] NBER, Cambridge, MA 02138 USA
[8] Univ Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN 55455 USA
[9] Fed Reserve Bank Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN USA
基金
美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
Fertility; Growth; Social Security; AS-YOU-GO; ENDOGENOUS FERTILITY; ECONOMIC-GROWTH; PUBLIC PENSIONS; MODEL; BEHAVIOR; MORTALITY;
D O I
10.1017/dem.2014.14
中图分类号
C921 [人口统计学];
学科分类号
摘要
The data show that an increase in government provided old-age pensions is strongly correlated with a reduction in fertility. What type of model is consistent with this finding? We explore this question using two models of fertility, the one by Barro and Becker (1989), and the one inspired by Caldwell and developed by Boldrin and Jones (2002). In the Barro and Becker model parents have children because they perceive their children's lives as a continuation of their own. In the Boldrin and Jones' framework parents procreate because the children care about their old parents' utility, and thus provide them with old age transfers. The effect of increases in government provided pensions on fertility in the Barro and Becker model is very small, and inconsistent with the empirical findings. The effect on fertility in the Boldrin and Jones model is sizeable and accounts for between 55 and 65% of the observed Europe-US fertility differences both across countries and across time and over 80% of the observed variation seen in a broad cross section of countries. Another key factor affecting fertility the Boldrin and Jones model is the access to capital markets, which can account for the other half of the observed change in fertility in developed countries over the last 70 years.
引用
收藏
页码:261 / 299
页数:39
相关论文
共 41 条
[11]   Jointly determined saving and fertility behaviour: Theory, and estimates for Germany, Italy, UK and USA [J].
Cigno, A ;
Rosati, FC .
EUROPEAN ECONOMIC REVIEW, 1996, 40 (08) :1561-1589
[12]  
Cigno Alessandro., 1991, Economics of the Family
[13]  
Cigno Alessandro., 2003, FinanzArchiv, V59, P189, DOI [10.2307/40912996, DOI 10.2307/40912996]
[14]   Gender differences in education in a dynamic household bargaining model [J].
Echevarria, C ;
Merlo, A .
INTERNATIONAL ECONOMIC REVIEW, 1999, 40 (02) :265-286
[15]   INTERGENERATIONAL TRADE, LONGEVITY, AND ECONOMIC-GROWTH [J].
EHRLICH, I ;
LUI, FT .
JOURNAL OF POLITICAL ECONOMY, 1991, 99 (05) :1029-1059
[16]   Social security, the family, and economic growth [J].
Ehrlich, I ;
Lui, FT .
ECONOMIC INQUIRY, 1998, 36 (03) :390-409
[17]  
Ehrlich I., 2005, REV ECON DYNAM, V10, P55
[18]   QUANTITATIVE STUDY OF DETERMINANTS OF FERTILITY BEHAVIOR [J].
FRIEDLANDER, S ;
SILVER, M .
DEMOGRAPHY, 1967, 4 (01) :30-70
[19]   The baby boom and baby bust [J].
Greenwood, J ;
Seshadri, A ;
Vandenbroucke, G .
AMERICAN ECONOMIC REVIEW, 2005, 95 (01) :183-207
[20]  
Gruber J., 1999, SOCIAL SECURITY RETI