Synthetic Indicators of Quality of Life in Europe

被引:161
作者
Somarriba, Noelia [1 ]
Pena, Bernardo [2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Valladolid, Dept Appl Econ, Valladolid, Spain
[2] Univ Alcala de Henares, Dept Econ Stat, Alcala De Henares, Spain
[3] Univ Alcala de Henares, Econ Struct & Int Econ Org, Alcala De Henares, Spain
关键词
Quality of life; Synthetic indicators; Distance measures; Data envelopment analysis; Principal components analysis; DEA;
D O I
10.1007/s11205-008-9356-y
中图分类号
C [社会科学总论];
学科分类号
03 ; 0303 ;
摘要
For more than three decades now, sociologists, politicians and economists have used a wide range of statistical and econometric techniques to analyse and measure the quality of life of individuals with the aim of obtaining useful instruments for social, political and economic decision making. The aim of this paper is to analyse the advantages and disadvantages of three possible methodologies for obtaining synthetic indicators for the area of welfare and quality of life. These methodologies are Principal Components Analysis, Data Envelopment Analysis and Measure of Distance P-2. Furthermore this paper analyses quality of life in the European Union (EU), as a methodological exercise to demonstrate the principles of calculation, implications and differences between the three indicator-construction approaches. This analysis is particularly useful in a scene like the EU, immersed in a deep transformation process and with profound cultural, economic and social inequalities. Therefore, an analysis of the quality of life and well-being of its inhabitants can play a major role in ironing out such differences.
引用
收藏
页码:115 / 133
页数:19
相关论文
共 23 条
[1]  
ALLARDT E, 1973, POLICY SCI, V4, P63, DOI 10.1007/BF01404933
[2]  
Allardt E., 1973, About Dimensions of Welfare: An Exploratory Analysis of a Comparative Scandinavian Survey
[3]  
ALLARDT E, 1975, 9 U HELS RES GROUP C
[4]   MEASURING EFFICIENCY OF DECISION-MAKING UNITS [J].
CHARNES, A ;
COOPER, WW ;
RHODES, E .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OPERATIONAL RESEARCH, 1978, 2 (06) :429-444
[5]  
CHERCHYE L, 2002, BENCHMARKING SUSTAIN
[6]  
Delhey Jan., 2005, European Foundation for the Improvement of Living Conditions and the Working Conditions
[7]  
DESPOTIS DK, 2004, INT J MANAG IN PRESS
[8]  
DESPOTIS DK, 2004, J OPERATIONAL RES SO, P1
[9]   THE MEASUREMENT OF PRODUCTIVE EFFICIENCY [J].
FARRELL, MJ .
JOURNAL OF THE ROYAL STATISTICAL SOCIETY SERIES A-GENERAL, 1957, 120 (03) :253-290
[10]   Has livability of Japan gotten better for 1956-1990?: A DEA approach [J].
Hashimoto, A ;
Kodama, M .
SOCIAL INDICATORS RESEARCH, 1997, 40 (03) :359-373