Prediction of large-for-gestational-age neonates: screening by maternal factors and biomarkers in the three trimesters of pregnancy

被引:51
作者
Frick, A. P. [1 ]
Syngelaki, A. [1 ]
Zheng, M. [1 ]
Poon, L. C. [1 ]
Nicolaides, K. H. [1 ]
机构
[1] Kings Coll Hosp London, Harris Birthright Res Ctr Fetal Med, London SE5 9RS, England
关键词
fetal biometry; large-for-gestational age; maternal history; pyramid of antenatal care; screening; NUCHAL TRANSLUCENCY THICKNESS; BIRTH-WEIGHT; FETAL MACROSOMIA; RISK-FACTORS; WOMEN; DELIVERY; OUTCOMES; FETUS; COMPLICATIONS; POPULATION;
D O I
10.1002/uog.15780
中图分类号
O42 [声学];
学科分类号
070206 ; 082403 ;
摘要
Objective To develop a model based on maternal characteristics and medical history (maternal factors) for the prediction of delivery of large-for-gestational-age (LGA) neonates, and to examine the potential value of first-, second-and third-trimester fetal biometry and biomarkers in improving such a model. Methods This was a screening study in 76 300, 54 999, 25 727 and 6181 singleton pregnancies at 11-13, 19-24, 30-34 and 35-37weeks' gestation, respectively. The a-priori risk for LGA with birth weight >95th percentile (LGA >95th) was calculated using multivariable logistic regression analysis to determine which of the maternal factors had a significant contribution. Regression analysis was then used to determine whether screening by a combination of maternal factors, fetal biometry and various biophysical and biochemical markers had significant contribution in predicting delivery of LGA neonates. Results The likelihood of LGA >95th increased with increasing maternal weight and height and was lower in women of Afro-Caribbean and South Asian racial origins, in cigarette smokers and in nulliparous women. The risk was higher in women with pre-existing diabetes mellitus Type I and lower in those with chronic hypertension. In parous women, the risk increased with birth-weight Z-score in previous pregnancy and prior history of gestational diabetes and decreased with interpregnancy interval. Screening by maternal factors at 11-13weeks predicted 32%, 44% and 60% of LGA >95th at false-positive rates (FPRs) of 5%, 10% and 20%, respectively. With the addition of fetal biometry, the detection rates improved to 37%, 51% and 68% at 19-24weeks, 50%, 65% and 81% at 30-34weeks and 60%, 73% and 85% at 35-37 weeks at FPRs of 5%, 10% and 20%, respectively. The addition of biomarkers did not improve the detection rates achieved when screening by a combination of maternal factors and fetal biometry. Conclusion Combined screening by maternal factors and fetal biometry can predict a high proportion of pregnancies that will deliver LGA neonates. Copyright (C) 2015 ISUOG. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
引用
收藏
页码:332 / 339
页数:8
相关论文
共 48 条
[1]  
ACOG, 2000, OBSTET GYNECOL, P1
[2]   One-stage screening for pregnancy complications by color Doppler assessment of the uterine arteries at 23 weeks' gestation [J].
Albaiges, G ;
Missfelder-Lobos, H ;
Lees, C ;
Parra, M ;
Nicolaides, KH .
OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2000, 96 (04) :559-564
[3]   Secular trends in neonatal macrosomia in Berlin: influences of potential determinants [J].
Bergmann, RL ;
Richter, R ;
Bergmann, KE ;
Plagemann, A ;
Brauer, M ;
Dudenhausen, JW .
PAEDIATRIC AND PERINATAL EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2003, 17 (03) :244-249
[4]   The large fetus [J].
Berkus, MD ;
Conway, D ;
Langer, O .
CLINICAL OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 1999, 42 (04) :766-784
[5]   Macrosomia: mode of delivery and pregnancy outcome [J].
Bjorstad, Astrid R. ;
Irgens-Hansen, Kaja ;
Daltveit, Anne Kjersti ;
Irgens, Lorentz M. .
ACTA OBSTETRICIA ET GYNECOLOGICA SCANDINAVICA, 2010, 89 (05) :664-669
[6]   Macrosomic births in the United States: Determinants, outcomes, and proposed grades of risk [J].
Boulet, SL ;
Alexander, GR ;
Salihu, HM ;
Pass, M .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2003, 188 (05) :1372-1378
[7]   Induction of labour versus expectant management for large-for-date fetuses: a randomised controlled trial [J].
Boulvain, Michel ;
Senat, Marie-Victoire ;
Perrotin, Franck ;
Winer, Norbert ;
Beucher, Gael ;
Subtil, Damien ;
Bretelle, Florence ;
Azria, Elie ;
Hejaiej, Dominique ;
Vendittelli, Francoise ;
Capelle, Marianne ;
Langer, Bruno ;
Matis, Richard ;
Connan, Laure ;
Gillard, Philippe ;
Kirkpatrick, Christine ;
Ceysens, Gilles ;
Faron, Gilles ;
Irion, Olivier ;
Rozenberg, Patrick .
LANCET, 2015, 385 (9987) :2600-2605
[8]   Fetal macrosomia: a problem in need of a policy [J].
Campbell, Stuart .
ULTRASOUND IN OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY, 2014, 43 (01) :3-10
[9]   Obstetric antecedents for postpartum pelvic floor dysfunction [J].
Casey, BM ;
Schaffer, JI ;
Bloom, SL ;
Heartwell, SF ;
McIntire, DD ;
Leveno, KJ .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2005, 192 (05) :1655-1662
[10]   Suspicion and treatment of the macrosomic fetus: A review [J].
Chauhan, SP ;
Grobman, WA ;
Gherman, RA ;
Chauhan, VB ;
Chang, G ;
Magann, EF ;
Hendrix, NW .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2005, 193 (02) :332-346