An investigation comparing ground-based techniques that quantify auroral electron flux and conductance

被引:37
作者
Kaeppler, S. R. [1 ]
Hampton, D. L. [2 ]
Nicolls, M. J. [1 ]
Stromme, A. [1 ]
Solomon, S. C. [3 ]
Hecht, J. H. [4 ]
Conde, M. G. [2 ]
机构
[1] SRI Int, Menlo Pk, CA 94025 USA
[2] Univ Alaska Fairbanks, Inst Geophys, Fairbanks, AK 99775 USA
[3] Natl Ctr Atmospher Res, High Altitude Observ, Boulder, CO 80307 USA
[4] Aerosp Corp, Los Angeles, CA 90009 USA
基金
美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
Aurora; Conductance; Electron; radar; optics; precipitation; TRANSPORT-THEORETIC MODEL; HYDROGEN ATOM AURORA; ENERGY FLUX; IONOSPHERIC CONDUCTANCES; DEDUCING COMPOSITION; OPTICAL MEASUREMENTS; SONDRE-STROMFJORD; EVENING SECTOR; RADAR; SPECTRA;
D O I
10.1002/2015JA021396
中图分类号
P1 [天文学];
学科分类号
0704 ;
摘要
We present three case studies that examine optical and radar methods for specifying precipitating auroral flux parameters and conductances. Three events were chosen corresponding to moderate nonsubstorm auroral activity with 557.7 nm intensities greater than 1kR. A technique that directly fits the electron number density from a forward electron transport model to alternating code incoherent scatter radar data is presented. A method for determining characteristic energy using neutral temperature observations is compared against estimates from the incoherent scatter radar. These techniques are focused on line-of-sight observations that are aligned with the local geomagnetic field. Good agreement is found between the optical and incoherent scatter radar methods for estimates of the average energy, energy flux, and conductances. The Pedersen conductance predicted by Robinson et al. (1987) is in very good agreement with estimates calculated from the incoherent scatter radar observations. However, we present an updated form of the relation by Robinson et al. (1987), sigma(H)/sigma(P)=0.57E(0.53), which was found to be more consistent with the incoherent scatter radar observations. These results are limited to similar auroral configurations as in these case studies. Case studies are presented that quantify auroral electron flux parameters and conductance estimates which can be used to specify the magnitude of energy dissipated within the ionosphere resulting from magnetospheric driving.
引用
收藏
页码:9038 / 9056
页数:19
相关论文
共 72 条
[1]   Ion-neutral coupling in Earth's thermosphere, estimated from concurrent radar and optical observations above Alaska [J].
Anderson, C. ;
Kosch, M. J. ;
Nicolls, M. J. ;
Conde, M. .
JOURNAL OF ATMOSPHERIC AND SOLAR-TERRESTRIAL PHYSICS, 2013, 105 :313-324
[2]  
Banks P., 1973, Aeronomy
[3]   NEW MODEL FOR INTERACTION OF AURORAL ELECTRONS WITH ATMOSPHERE - SPECTRAL DEGRADATION, BACKSCATTER, OPTICAL EMISSION, AND IONIZATION [J].
BANKS, PM ;
CHAPPELL, CR ;
NAGY, AF .
JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH, 1974, 79 (10) :1459-1470
[4]   SPATIAL-DISTRIBUTION OF ENERGY DEPOSITED IN NITROGEN BY ELECTRONS [J].
BARRETT, JL ;
HAYS, PB .
JOURNAL OF CHEMICAL PHYSICS, 1976, 64 (02) :743-750
[5]   TRANSPORT-THEORETIC MODEL FOR THE ELECTRON-PROTON-HYDROGEN ATOM AURORA .1. THEORY [J].
BASU, B ;
JASPERSE, JR ;
STRICKLAND, DJ ;
DANIELL, RE .
JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH-SPACE PHYSICS, 1993, 98 (A12) :21517-21532
[6]  
Bevington P. R., 2003, Data reduction and error analysis for the physical sciences
[7]   MODEL OF AURORAL ELECTROJETS [J].
BOSTROM, R .
JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH, 1964, 69 (23) :4983-+
[8]  
BREKKE A, 1989, ANN GEOPHYS, V7, P269
[9]   Imaging F region drifts using monostatic phased-array incoherent scatter radar [J].
Butler, T. W. ;
Semeter, J. ;
Heinselman, C. J. ;
Nicolls, M. J. .
RADIO SCIENCE, 2010, 45
[10]  
Chamberlain J.W., 1961, PHYS AURORA AIRGLOW