Lateralized effects of categorical and coordinate spatial processing of component parts on the recognition of 3D non-nameable objects

被引:7
作者
Saneyoshi, Ayako [1 ]
Michimata, Chikashi [2 ]
机构
[1] Teikyo Univ, Dept Psychol, Tokyo 173, Japan
[2] Sophia Univ, Dept Psychol, Tokyo 102, Japan
关键词
Hemispheric asymmetry; Categorical and coordinate spatial processing; Object recognition; Between- and within-category object discrimination; HEMISPHERIC-SPECIALIZATION; IDENTIFICATION; FREQUENCIES;
D O I
10.1016/j.bandc.2009.09.001
中图分类号
Q189 [神经科学];
学科分类号
071006 ;
摘要
Participants performed two object-matching tasks for novel, non-nameable objects consisting of geons. For each original stimulus, two transformations were applied to create comparison stimuli. In the categorical transformation, a geon connected to geon A was moved to geon B. In the coordinate transformation, a geon connected to geon A was moved to a different position on geon A. The Categorical task consisted of the original and the categorically transformed objects. The Coordinate task consisted of the original and the coordinately transformed objects. The original object was presented to the central visual field, followed by a comparison object presented to the right or left visual half-fields (RVF and LVF). The results showed an RVF advantage for the Categorical task and an LVF advantage for the Coordinate task. The possibility that categorical and coordinate spatial processing subsystems would be basic computational elements for between- and within-category object recognition was discussed. (C) 2009 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved
引用
收藏
页码:181 / 186
页数:6
相关论文
共 24 条
[11]   SEEING AND IMAGINING IN THE CEREBRAL HEMISPHERES - A COMPUTATIONAL APPROACH [J].
KOSSLYN, SM .
PSYCHOLOGICAL REVIEW, 1987, 94 (02) :148-175
[12]   You can play 20 questions with nature and win: Categorical versus coordinate spatial relations as a case study [J].
Kosslyn, Stephen M. .
NEUROPSYCHOLOGIA, 2006, 44 (09) :1519-1523
[13]  
Laeng B, 2003, ASYMMETRICAL BRAIN, P303
[14]   Do separate processes identify objects as exemplars versus members of basic-level categories? Evidence from hemispheric specialization [J].
Laeng, B ;
Zarrinpar, A ;
Kosslyn, SM .
BRAIN AND COGNITION, 2003, 53 (01) :15-27
[15]   Rigid and nonrigid objects in canonical and noncanonical views: Hemisphere-specific effects on object identification [J].
Laeng, B ;
Carlesimo, GA ;
Caltagirone, C ;
Capasso, R ;
Miceli, G .
COGNITIVE NEUROPSYCHOLOGY, 2002, 19 (08) :697-720
[16]   Dissociable neural, subsystems underlie abstract and specific object recognition [J].
Marsolek, CJ .
PSYCHOLOGICAL SCIENCE, 1999, 10 (02) :111-118
[17]  
Mart D., 1982, VISION
[18]   Is there continuity between categorical and coordinate spatial relations coding? Evidence from a grid/no-grid working memory paradigm [J].
Martin, Romain ;
Houssemand, Claude ;
Schiltz, Christine ;
Burnod, Yves ;
Alexandre, Frederic .
NEUROPSYCHOLOGIA, 2008, 46 (02) :576-594
[19]   Hemispheric processing of categorical and coordinate spatial relations in vision and visual imagery [J].
Michimata, C .
BRAIN AND COGNITION, 1997, 33 (03) :370-387
[20]   Categorical perception of familiar objects [J].
Newell, FN ;
Bülthoff, HH .
COGNITION, 2002, 85 (02) :113-143