Testing the START Triage Protocol: Can It Improve the Ability of Nonmedical Personnel to Better Triage Patients During Disasters and Mass Casualties Incidents ?

被引:16
作者
Badiali, Stefano [1 ]
Giugni, Aimone [1 ]
Marcis, Lucia [2 ]
机构
[1] Bologna NHS Emergency Dept, Bologna, Italy
[2] Italian Red Cross Bologna Comm, Rizzoli Orthoped Inst Bologna, Bologna, Italy
关键词
START triage; triage effectiveness; nonmedical first responders; triage accuracy;
D O I
10.1017/dmp.2016.151
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
Objective: START (Simple Triage and Rapid Treatment) triage is a tool that is available even to nonmedical rescue personnel in case of a disaster or mass casualty incident (MCI). In Italy, no data are available on whether application of the START protocol could improve patient outcomes during a disaster or MCI. We aimed to address whether "last-minute" START training of nonmedical personnel during a disaster or MCI would result in more effective triage of patients. Methods: In this case-control study, 400 nonmedical ambulance crew members were randomly assigned to a non-START or a START group (200 per group). The START group received last-minute START training. Each group examined 6000 patients, obtained from the Emergo Train System (ETS Italy, Bologna, Italy) victims database, and assigned patients a triage code (black-red-yellow-green) along with a reason for the assignment. Each rescuer triaged 30 patients within a 30-minute time frame. Results were analyzed according to Fisher's exact test for a P value < 0.01. Under-and over-triage ratios were analyzed as well. Results: The START group completed the evaluations in 15 minutes, whereas the non-START group took 30 minutes. The START group correctly triaged 94.2% of their patients, as opposed to 59.83% of the non-START group (P < 0.01). Under-and over-triage were, respectively, 2.73% and 3.08% for the START group versus 13.67% and 26.5% for the non-START group. The non-START group had 458 "preventable deaths" on 6000 cases because of incorrect triage, whereas the START group had 91. Conclusions: Even a "last-minute" training on the START triage protocol allows nonmedical personnel to better identify and triage the victims of a disaster or MCI, resulting in more effective and efficient medical intervention.
引用
收藏
页码:305 / 309
页数:5
相关论文
共 6 条
[1]  
Badiali S, 2000, HDB DISASTER MED, P289
[2]  
Guerisse P, 2000, BELG FED MIN HLTH OC
[3]   First Responder Accuracy Using SALT during Mass-casualty Incident Simulation [J].
Lee, Christopher W. C. ;
McLeod, Shelley L. ;
Van Aarsen, Kristine ;
Klingel, Michelle ;
Franc, Jeffrey M. ;
Peddle, Michael B. .
PREHOSPITAL AND DISASTER MEDICINE, 2016, 31 (02) :150-154
[4]  
Motola Ivette, 2015, J Trauma Acute Care Surg, V79, pS152, DOI 10.1097/TA.0000000000000570
[5]   Simulation-assisted burn disaster planning [J].
Nilsson, Helene ;
Jonson, Carl-Oscar ;
Vikstrom, Tore ;
Bengtsson, Eva ;
Thorfinn, Johan ;
Huss, Fredrik ;
Kildal, Morten ;
Sjoberg, Folke .
BURNS, 2013, 39 (06) :1122-1130
[6]   MASS CASUALTY DISASTERS: WHO SHOULD RUN THE SHOW? [J].
Russo, Rachel M. ;
Galante, Joseph M. ;
Jacoby, Robert C. ;
Shatz, David V. .
JOURNAL OF EMERGENCY MEDICINE, 2015, 48 (06) :685-692