Decision making and planning under low levels of predictability Introduction

被引:44
作者
Makridakis, Spyros [1 ]
Taleb, Nassim [2 ]
机构
[1] INSEAD, F-77305 Fontainebleau, France
[2] NYU, Polytech Inst, Dept Finance & Risk Engn, MetroTech Ctr 6, Brooklyn, NY 11201 USA
关键词
Forecasting; Accuracy; Uncertainty; Low level predictability; Non-normal forecasting errors; Judgmental predictions;
D O I
10.1016/j.ijforecast.2009.05.013
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
This special section aims to demonstrate the limited predictability and high level of uncertainty in practically all important areas of our lives, and the implications of this. It summarizes the huge body of solid empirical evidence accumulated over the past several decades that proves the disastrous consequences of inaccurate forecasts in areas ranging from the economy and business to floods and medicine. The big problem is, however, that the Great majority of people, decision and policy makers alike, still believe not only that accurate forecasting is possible, but also that uncertainty can be reliably assessed. Reality, however, shows otherwise, as this special section proves. This paper discusses forecasting accuracy and uncertainty, and distinguishes three distinct types of predictions: those relying on patterns for forecasting, those utilizing relationships as their basis, and those for which human judgment is the major determinant of the forecast. In addition, the major problems and challenges facing forecasters and the reasons why uncertainty cannot be assessed reliably are discussed using four large data sets. There is also a summary of the eleven papers included in this special section, as well as some concluding remarks emphasizing the need to be rational and realistic about our expectations and avoid the common delusions related to forecasting. (C) 2009 International Institute of Forecasters. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:716 / 733
页数:18
相关论文
共 11 条
  • [1] Fast and frugal forecasting
    Goldstein, Daniel G.
    Gigerenzer, Gerd
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF FORECASTING, 2009, 25 (04) : 760 - 772
  • [2] Clinical versus mechanical prediction: A meta-analysis
    Grove, WM
    Zald, DH
    Lebow, BS
    Snitz, BE
    Nelson, C
    [J]. PSYCHOLOGICAL ASSESSMENT, 2000, 12 (01) : 19 - 30
  • [3] THE ACCURACY OF EXTRAPOLATION (TIME-SERIES) METHODS - RESULTS OF A FORECASTING COMPETITION
    MAKRIDAKIS, S
    ANDERSEN, A
    CARBONE, R
    FILDES, R
    HIBON, M
    LEWANDOWSKI, R
    NEWTON, J
    PARZEN, E
    WINKLER, R
    [J]. JOURNAL OF FORECASTING, 1982, 1 (02) : 111 - 153
  • [4] Makridakis S., 2009, Dance with chance: Making luck work for you
  • [5] MALCRIDAKIS S, 2000, INT J FORECASTING, V16, P451
  • [6] THE VARIATION OF CERTAIN SPECULATIVE PRICES
    MANDELBROT, B
    [J]. JOURNAL OF BUSINESS, 1963, 36 (04) : 394 - 419
  • [7] Meehl P.E., 1954, CLIN VS STAT PREDICT
  • [8] System economics: Overcoming the pitfalls of forecasting models via a multidisciplinary approach
    Orrell, David
    McSharry, Patrick
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF FORECASTING, 2009, 25 (04) : 734 - 743
  • [9] Taleb N., 2007, The Black Swan: The Impact of the Highly Improbable
  • [10] Tetlock PE, 2005, EXPERT POLITICAL JUDGMENT: HOW GOOD IS IT, HOW CAN WE KNOW, P1