Using case method to enrich students' learning outcomes

被引:32
作者
Nkhoma, Mathews [1 ]
Sriratanaviriyakul, Narumon [1 ]
Huy Le Quang [2 ]
机构
[1] RMIT Univ Vietnam, Dept Business IT & Logist, 702 Nguyen Van Linh,Dist 7, Ho Chi Minh City 70000, Vietnam
[2] RMIT Univ Vietnam, Asia Grad Ctr, 702 Nguyen Van Linh,Dist 7, Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam
关键词
case method; collaborative learning; interactivity; learning outcomes; student engagement; time; case studies; discussion cases; ACADEMIC ENGAGEMENT; TIME; EXPERIENCES; UNIVERSITY; INTERACTIVITY; FACULTY; MATTER;
D O I
10.1177/1469787417693501
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
There is a need to examine the effect of using discussion cases to enrich students' learning outcomes. A research framework was created to study this multidimensional relationship, via the instruments of interactivity, students' time devotion and students' engagement in order to find which factors could improve learning outcomes, including positive group interaction and individual learning performance. The findings from three cohorts of undergraduate students of the same course indicated that interactivity with peers and with the lecturers during the case discussion in classes improved emotional engagement, which in turn positively influenced positive group interaction and individual learning performance. The study also found that students' emotional engagement was a significant factor in enriching outcomes. Although there was a lack of direct impact of interactivity on learning outcomes, there were many reasons attributed to it. The time that students devoted to the task, as a result of interactivity with the lecturer, was a significant predictor of emotional academic engagement, but it did not predict desirable learning outcomes.
引用
收藏
页码:37 / 50
页数:14
相关论文
共 54 条
[1]   Investigating strategies for using related cases to support design problem solving [J].
Bennett, Sue .
ETR&D-EDUCATIONAL TECHNOLOGY RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT, 2010, 58 (04) :459-480
[2]   Using clickers in class. The role of interactivity, active collaborative learning and engagement in learning performance [J].
Blasco-Arcas, Lorena ;
Buil, Isabel ;
Hernandez-Ortega, Blanca ;
Javier Sese, F. .
COMPUTERS & EDUCATION, 2013, 62 :102-110
[3]  
Bonwell CC, 1996, New directions for teaching and learning, V1996, P3, DOI [DOI 10.1002/TL.37219966704, 10.1002/tl.37219966704]
[4]   Student engagement and student learning: Testing the linkages [J].
Carini, Robert M. ;
Kuh, George D. ;
Klein, Stephen P. .
RESEARCH IN HIGHER EDUCATION, 2006, 47 (01) :1-32
[5]   BEYOND THE LECTURE - CASE TEACHING AND THE LEARNING OF ECONOMIC-THEORY [J].
CARLSON, JA ;
SCHODT, DW .
JOURNAL OF ECONOMIC EDUCATION, 1995, 26 (01) :17-28
[6]  
Cavanaugh M., 2011, Active Learning in Higher Education, V12, P23, DOI [DOI 10.1177/1469787410387724, 10.1177/1469787410387724]
[7]  
Chin WW, 1998, QUANT METH SER, P295
[8]   Grouping in the dark - What college students learn from group projects [J].
Colbeck, CL ;
Campbell, SE ;
Bjorklund, SA .
JOURNAL OF HIGHER EDUCATION, 2000, 71 (01) :60-+
[9]   Exploring student perceptions of group interaction and class satisfaction in the web-enhanced classroom [J].
Driver, Michaela .
Internet and Higher Education, 2002, 5 (01) :35-45
[10]   Differential effects of learner effort and goal orientation on two learning outcomes [J].
Fisher, SL ;
Ford, JK .
PERSONNEL PSYCHOLOGY, 1998, 51 (02) :397-420