To identify industry 4.0 and circular economy adoption barriers in the agriculture supply chain by using ISM-ANP

被引:265
作者
Kumar, Shashank [1 ]
Raut, Rakesh D. [1 ]
Nayal, Kirti [1 ]
Kraus, Sascha [2 ]
Yadav, Vinay Surendra [3 ]
Narkhede, Balkrishna E. [1 ]
机构
[1] Natl Inst Ind Engn NITIE, Dept Operat & Supply Chain Management, NITIE, Mumbai 400087, Maharashtra, India
[2] Free Univ Bozen Bolzano, Fac Econ & Management, Piazza Univ 1, I-39100 Bolzano, Italy
[3] Natl Inst Technol Raipur, Dept Mech Engn, Raipur, India
关键词
Agriculture supply chain; Barriers; Circular economy; Industry; 4.0; ISM-ANP; RESEARCH AGENDA; BIG DATA; SUSTAINABILITY; CHALLENGES; BLOCKCHAIN; PRODUCT; CONTEXT; SYSTEMS;
D O I
10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.126023
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
With increasing globalization and digitalization, agricultural organizations have started changing their business processes. Agri-organization has begun to adopt technologies to get a more sophisticated, customer-centric, and sustainable supply chain. Although the introduction of interconnected new technologies and the concept of circular economy (CE) present numerous challenges, it has proved its value in the industrial sector to achieve a sustainability target. This study identifies Industry 4.0 (I4.0) and CE adoption barriers in the agriculture supply chain (ASC) in India. The study was extended to ascertain the contextual relationship among the barriers and to prioritize them with respect to one another. The 11 barriers with their key elements were enlisted after thorough literature analysis and interaction with experts. The barriers were modeled through an integrated ISM-ANP approach. The study indicates that lack of government support and incentives and lack of policies and protocols are significant obstacles to implementing the I4.0-CE model. The findings of the current research work will be beneficial for the agri supply chain stakeholders in preparing the strategic deployment of I4.0-CE. (C) 2021 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页数:13
相关论文
共 74 条
[1]   Development of weighted triple-bottom line sustainability indicators for the Malaysian food manufacturing industry using the Delphi method [J].
Ahmad, Shamraiz ;
Wong, Kuan Yew .
JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2019, 229 :1167-1182
[2]   Towards a framework of smart-circular systems: An integrative literature review [J].
Alcayaga, Andres ;
Wiener, Melanie ;
Hansen, Erik G. .
JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2019, 221 :622-634
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2019, Skills for a greener future: a global view based on 32 country studies
[4]   Industry 4.0 technologies assessment: A sustainability perspective [J].
Bai, Chunguang ;
Dallasega, Patrick ;
Orzes, Guido ;
Sarkis, Joseph .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PRODUCTION ECONOMICS, 2020, 229
[5]   Blockchain with IOT: Applications and use cases for a new paradigm of supply chain driving efficiency and cost [J].
Banerjee, Arnab .
ROLE OF BLOCKCHAIN TECHNOLOGY IN IOT APPLICATIONS, 2019, 115 :259-292
[6]   Big data for agri-food 4.0: Application to sustainability management for by-products supply chain [J].
Belaud, Jean-Pierre ;
Prioux, Nancy ;
Vialle, Claire ;
Sablayrolles, Caroline .
COMPUTERS IN INDUSTRY, 2019, 111 :41-50
[7]   The Advantages of Industry 4.0 Applications for Sustainability: Results from a Sample of Manufacturing Companies [J].
Brozzi, Riccardo ;
Forti, David ;
Rauch, Erwin ;
Matt, Dominik T. .
SUSTAINABILITY, 2020, 12 (09)
[8]   How blockchain improves the supply chain: case study alimentary supply chain [J].
Casado-Vara, Roberto ;
Prieto, Javier ;
De la Prieta, Fernando ;
Corchado, Juan M. .
15TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON MOBILE SYSTEMS AND PERVASIVE COMPUTING (MOBISPC 2018) / THE 13TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON FUTURE NETWORKS AND COMMUNICATIONS (FNC-2018) / AFFILIATED WORKSHOPS, 2018, 134 :393-398
[9]  
Chandrasekaran N, 2014, AGRIBUSINESS SUPPLY CHAIN MANAGEMENT, P1
[10]   An ISM-ANP approach to identifying key agile factors in launching a new product into mass production [J].
Chang, An-Yuan ;
Hu, Kuo-Jen ;
Hong, Yun-Lin .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PRODUCTION RESEARCH, 2013, 51 (02) :582-597