Heat Flux and Pressure Reduction Using Aerospike and Counterflowing Jet on Complex Hypersonic Flow

被引:14
作者
Jia, Juhong [1 ]
Zhang, Yijie [2 ]
机构
[1] Beijing Inst Technol, Sch Aerosp Engn, Beijing 100081, Peoples R China
[2] Shaoxing Univ, Dept Shangyu, Shaoxing 312300, Peoples R China
关键词
Hypersonic; Flow; Heat transfer; Aerospike; Counterflowing; Computational fluid dynamics; TRANSVERSE HYDROGEN JET; DRAG REDUCTION; AIR-JETS; BODY;
D O I
10.1007/s42405-019-00227-9
中图分类号
V [航空、航天];
学科分类号
08 ; 0825 ;
摘要
A numerical study on a reduction of aerodynamic heating and pressure by an active or passive control strategy has been conducted. Three-dimensional double ellipsoid models with aerospike or opposing jet are investigated. In numerical analysis, three-dimensional Navier-Stokes equations are solved by a finite-volume method, and hybrid LES/RANS turbulence model is used. The results show that the use of aerospike or counterflowing jet bring about an obvious decrease in pressure and heat flux values of the nose. However, both the pressure and heat flux appears an increase on body surface either for aerospike model or opposing jet model. For aerospike model, the aerospike will push the bow shock standing away from the first ellipsoid and creates an elliptical shaped recirculation zone, in which the pressure and heat flux keep at a low level. After that, the shear layer will reattaches to the shoulder and creates the peak value of the heat flux and pressure. For opposing jet model, the counterflowing jet flows out the nozzle and pushes the bow shock away from the nose. Meanwhile, the jet flow is pushed back by the freestream and reattached to the ellipsoid shoulder surface. Then, the heat flux and pressure peaks are created by reattachment. These separation and reattachment lead to the ups and downs of the surface pressure and heat flux.
引用
收藏
页码:337 / 346
页数:10
相关论文
共 23 条
[1]   Mixing augmentation of transverse hydrogen jet by injection of micro air jets in supersonic crossflow [J].
Anazadehsayed, A. ;
Gerdroodbary, M. Barzegar ;
Amini, Y. ;
Moradi, R. .
ACTA ASTRONAUTICA, 2017, 137 :403-414
[2]  
Batten P, 2003, AER SCI M EXH, P2, DOI [10.2514/6.2003-81, DOI 10.2514/6.2003-81]
[3]  
Bhagwandin VA, 2013, B MAR SCI MIAMI, V39, P202, DOI [10.1515/botm.1986.29.5.455, DOI 10.1515/BOTM.1986.29.5.455]
[4]   High-Alpha Prediction of Roll Damping and Magnus Stability Coefficients for Finned Projectiles [J].
Bhagwandin, Vishal A. .
JOURNAL OF SPACECRAFT AND ROCKETS, 2016, 53 (04) :720-729
[5]  
Chakraborty S. S., 1998, Acta Polytechnica Scandinavica, Electrical Engineering Series, P1
[6]   The State of the Art of Hybrid RANS/LES Modeling for the Simulation of Turbulent Flows [J].
Chaouat, Bruno .
FLOW TURBULENCE AND COMBUSTION, 2017, 99 (02) :279-327
[7]   Drag reduction investigation for hypersonic lifting-body vehicles with aerospike and long penetration mode counterflowing jet [J].
Deng, Fan ;
Xie, Feng ;
Qin, Ning ;
Huang, Wei ;
Wang, Lansong ;
Chu, Hongyu .
AEROSPACE SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 2018, 76 :361-373
[8]   Assessment of Turbulence-Chemistry Interaction in Hypersonic Turbulent Boundary Layers [J].
Duan, L. ;
Martin, M. P. .
AIAA JOURNAL, 2011, 49 (01) :172-184
[9]   Drag reduction for the combination of spike and counterflow jet on blunt body at high Mach number flow [J].
Eghlima, Z. ;
Mansour, K. .
ACTA ASTRONAUTICA, 2017, 133 :103-110
[10]   Characteristics of transverse hydrogen jet in presence of multi air jets within scramjet combustor [J].
Gerdroodbary, M. Barzegar ;
Fallah, Keivan ;
Pourmirzaagha, H. .
ACTA ASTRONAUTICA, 2017, 132 :25-32