One-year follow-up after sacrospinous hysteropexy and vaginal hysterectomy for uterine descent: a randomized study

被引:141
作者
Dietz, Viviane [1 ]
van der Vaart, Carl H. [2 ]
van der Graaf, Yolanda [3 ]
Heintz, Peter [2 ]
Koops, Steven E. Schraffordt [4 ]
机构
[1] Catharina Med Ctr, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, NL-5623 Eindhoven, Netherlands
[2] Univ Med Ctr Utrecht, Dept Perinatol & Gynecol, Utrecht, Netherlands
[3] Univ Med Ctr Utrecht, Julius Ctr Hlth Sci & Primary Care, Utrecht, Netherlands
[4] Meander Med Ctr, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Amersfoort, Netherlands
关键词
Anatomical outcomes; Pelvic organ prolapse; Quality of life; Recovery time; Sacrospinous hysteropexy; Vaginal hysterectomy; UTEROVAGINAL PROLAPSE; COLPOPEXY; WOMEN;
D O I
10.1007/s00192-009-1014-7
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
In a retrospective study, the sacrospinous hysteropexy was associated with a shorter recovery time compared to a vaginal hysterectomy with no differences in anatomical outcomes. No randomized trials are performed. Sixty-six women with stage 2-4 uterine descent were randomized for vaginal hysterectomy(31) or sacrospinous hysteropexy(35). Recovery time, anatomical outcomes, functional outcomes, and quality of life were measured. Length of time to return to work was shorter after a sacrospinous hysteropexy (43 versus 66 days, p = 0.02). The difference in risk for recurrent prolapse stage 2 or more of the apical compartment at 1-year follow-up was 17% (95% confidence interval, 2 to 30) in favor of the vaginal hysterectomy. No differences in quality of life and urogenital symptoms were found. The sacrospinous hysteropexy for uterine descent is associated with an earlier recovery time, more recurrent apical prolapses but no differences in functional outcomes, and quality of life.
引用
收藏
页码:209 / 216
页数:8
相关论文
共 19 条
  • [1] Altman DG, 2000, Statistics with confidence, V2nd
  • [2] Brummen HJ, 2003, INT UROGYNECOL J, V14, P350
  • [3] The standardization of terminology of female pelvic organ prolapse and pelvic floor dysfunction
    Bump, RC
    Mattiasson, A
    Bo, K
    Brubaker, LP
    DeLancey, JOL
    Klarskov, P
    Shull, BL
    Smith, ARB
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 1996, 175 (01) : 10 - 17
  • [4] TRANSVAGINAL SACROSPINOUS COLPOPEXY FOR VAULT AND MARKED UTEROVAGINAL PROLAPSE
    CAREY, MP
    SLACK, MC
    [J]. BRITISH JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY, 1994, 101 (06): : 536 - 540
  • [5] Functional outcome after sacrospinous hysteropexy for uterine descensus
    Dietz, Viviane
    Huisman, Marieke
    de Jong, Joyce M.
    Heintz, Peter M.
    van der Vaart, Carl H.
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL UROGYNECOLOGY JOURNAL, 2008, 19 (06) : 747 - 752
  • [6] The effectiveness of the sacrospinous hysteropexy for the primary treatment of uterovaginal prolapse
    Dietz, Viviane
    de Jong, Joyce
    Huisman, Marieke
    Koops, Steven Schraffordt
    Heintz, Peter
    van der Vaart, Huub
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL UROGYNECOLOGY JOURNAL, 2007, 18 (11) : 1271 - 1276
  • [7] Sacrospinous cervicocolpopexy with uterine conservation for uterovaginal prolapse in elderly women: An evolving concept
    Hefni, M
    El-Toukhy, T
    Bhaumik, J
    Katsimanis, E
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2003, 188 (03) : 645 - 650
  • [8] HIRSCH HA, 1997, ATLAS GYNECOLOGIC SU, P226
  • [9] Jeng CJ, 2005, J REPROD MED, V50, P669
  • [10] Lin TY, 2005, J FORMOS MED ASSOC, V104, P249