Initial injectable therapy in type 2 diabetes: Key considerations when choosing between glucagon-like peptide 1 receptor agonists and insulin

被引:19
作者
Alexopoulos, Anastasia-Stefania [1 ]
Buse, John B. [2 ]
机构
[1] Duke Univ, Med Ctr, Durham, NC 27708 USA
[2] Univ N Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC 27515 USA
来源
METABOLISM-CLINICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL | 2019年 / 98卷
基金
美国国家卫生研究院;
关键词
FIXED-RATIO COMBINATION; ACHIEVE GLYCEMIC CONTROL; ONCE-WEEKLY SEMAGLUTIDE; OPEN-LABEL; BASAL INSULIN; PARALLEL-GROUP; WEEKLY EXENATIDE; WEIGHT-GAIN; CARDIOVASCULAR OUTCOMES; CLINICAL-TRIAL;
D O I
10.1016/j.metabol.2019.06.012
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Managing type 2 diabetes is complex and necessitates careful consideration of patient factors such as engagement in self-care, comorbidities and costs. Since type 2 diabetes is a progressive disease, many patients will require injectable agents, usually insulin. Recent ADA-EASD guidelines recommend glucagon-like peptide 1 receptor agonists (GLP-1 RAs) as first injectable therapy in most cases. The basis for this recommendation is the similar glycemic efficacy of GLP-1 RAs and insulin, but with GLP-1 RAs promoting weight loss instead of weight gain, at lower hypoglycemia risk, and with cardiovascular benefits in patients with pre-existing cardiovascular disease. GLP-1 RAs also reduce burden of glucose self-monitoring. However, tolerability and costs are important considerations, and notably, rates of drug discontinuation are often higher for GLP-1 RAs than basal insulin. To minimize risk of gastrointestinal symptoms patients should be started on lowest doses of GLP-1 RAs and up-titrated slowly. Overall healthcare costs may be lower with GLP-1 RAs compared to insulin. Though patient-level costs may still be prohibitive, GLP-1 RAs can replace 50-80 units of insulin daily and reduce costs associated with glucose self-monitoring. Decisions regarding initiating injectable therapy should be individualized. This review provides a framework to guide decision-making in the real-world setting. (C) 2019 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:104 / 111
页数:8
相关论文
共 81 条
[1]   Efficacy and Safety of Once-Weekly Semaglutide Versus Exenatide ER in Subjects With Type 2 Diabetes (SUSTAIN 3): A 56-Week, Open-Label, Randomized Clinical Trial [J].
Ahmann, Andrew J. ;
Capehorn, Matthew ;
Charpentier, Guillaume ;
Dotta, Francesco ;
Henkel, Elena ;
Lingvay, Ildiko ;
Holst, Anders G. ;
Annett, Miriam P. ;
Aroda, Vanita R. .
DIABETES CARE, 2018, 41 (02) :258-266
[2]   Semaglutide for type 2 diabetes mellitus: A systematic review and meta-analysis [J].
Andreadis, Panagiotis ;
Karagiannis, Thomas ;
Malandris, Konstantinos ;
Avgerinos, Ioannis ;
Liakos, Aris ;
Manolopoulos, Apostolos ;
Bekiari, Eleni ;
Matthews, David R. ;
Tsapas, Apostolos .
DIABETES OBESITY & METABOLISM, 2018, 20 (09) :2255-2263
[3]  
[Anonymous], 1998, ARCH OPHTHALMOL CHIC
[4]  
[Anonymous], INS DEGL LIR IDEGLIR
[5]  
[Anonymous], N ENGL J MED
[6]  
[Anonymous], J MANAG CARE SPEC PH
[7]  
[Anonymous], 2019, LANCET
[8]  
[Anonymous], DIABETES METAB
[9]   Efficacy and safety of once-weekly dulaglutide in combination with sulphonylurea and/or biguanide compared with once-daily insulin glargine in Japanese patients with type 2 diabetes: a randomized, open-label, phase III, non-inferiority study [J].
Araki, E. ;
Inagaki, N. ;
Tanizawa, Y. ;
Oura, T. ;
Takeuchi, M. ;
Imaoka, T. .
DIABETES OBESITY & METABOLISM, 2015, 17 (10) :994-1002
[10]   Efficacy and safety of once-weekly semaglutide versus once-daily insulin glargine as add-on to metformin (with or without sulfonylureas) in insulin-naive patients with type 2 diabetes (SUSTAIN 4): a randomised, open-label, parallel-group, multicentre, multinational, phase 3a trial [J].
Aroda, Vanita R. ;
Bain, Stephen C. ;
Cariou, Bertrand ;
Piletic, Milivoj ;
Rose, Ludger ;
Axelsen, Mads ;
Rowe, Everton ;
DeVries, J. Hans .
LANCET DIABETES & ENDOCRINOLOGY, 2017, 5 (05) :355-366