Prediction of dendrite arm spacings in unsteady- and steady-state heat flow of unidirectionally solidified binary alloys

被引:268
作者
Bouchard, D [1 ]
Kirkaldy, JS [1 ]
机构
[1] MCMASTER UNIV, BROCKHOUSE INST MAT RES, HAMILTON, ON L8S 4M1, CANADA
来源
METALLURGICAL AND MATERIALS TRANSACTIONS B-PROCESS METALLURGY AND MATERIALS PROCESSING SCIENCE | 1997年 / 28卷 / 04期
关键词
D O I
10.1007/s11663-997-0039-x
中图分类号
T [工业技术];
学科分类号
08 ;
摘要
Various theoretical dendrite and cell spacing formulas have been tested against experimental data obtained in unsteady- and steady-state heat flow conditions. An iterative assessment strategy satisfactorily overcomes the circumstances that certain constitutive parameters are inadequately established and/or highly variable and that many of the data sets, in terms of gradients, velocities, and/or cooling rates, are unreliable. The accessed unsteady- and steady-state observations on near-terminal binary alloys for primary and secondary spacings were first examined within conventional power law representations, the deduced exponents and confidence limits for each alloy being tabularly recorded. Through this analysis, it became clear that to achieve predictive generality the many constitutive parameters must be included in a rational way, this being achievable only through extant or new theoretical formulations. However, in the case of primary spacings, all formulas, including our own, failed within the unsteady heat flow algorithm while performing adequately within their steady-state context. An earlier untested, heuristically derived steady-state formula after modification, [GRAPHICS] ultimately proved its utility in the unsteady regime, and so it is recommended for purposes of predictions for general terminal alloys. For secondary spacings, a Mullins and Sekerka type formula proved from the start to be adequate in both unsteady- and steady-state heat flows, and so it recommends itself in calibrated form, [GRAPHICS] for future predictions.
引用
收藏
页码:651 / 663
页数:13
相关论文
共 74 条
[1]  
Ashtakala S., 1981, B ALLOY PHASE DIAGRA, V2, P86
[2]  
BADONCLERC M, 1974, MEM ETUD SCI REV MET, V71, P451
[3]  
BELL JAE, 1964, J I MET, V92, P357
[4]   ARRAYED DENDRITIC GROWTH [J].
BOLLING, GF ;
FAINSTEI.D .
ACTA METALLURGICA, 1974, 22 (08) :1033-1040
[5]   Scaling of intragranular dendritic microstructure in ingot solidification [J].
Bouchard, D ;
Kirkaldy, JS .
METALLURGICAL AND MATERIALS TRANSACTIONS B-PROCESS METALLURGY AND MATERIALS PROCESSING SCIENCE, 1996, 27 (01) :101-113
[6]  
BOWER TF, 1966, T METALL SOC AIME, V236, P624
[7]  
BROWN PE, 1960, WELD RES SUPPL DEC, P520
[8]  
Burden M. H., 1976, Metal Science, V10, P156
[9]   MACROSCOPIC STABILITY OF A PLANAR, CELLULAR OR DENDRITIC INTERFACE DURING DIRECTIONAL FREEZING [J].
BURDEN, MH ;
HEBDITCH, DJ ;
HUNT, JD .
JOURNAL OF CRYSTAL GROWTH, 1973, 20 (02) :121-124
[10]  
CAMPBELL J, 1991, CASTINGS, P264