The incidence of accessory navicular bone types in Turkish subjects

被引:15
作者
Coskun, Nigar Keles [1 ]
Arican, Ramazan Yavuz [1 ]
Utuk, Arzu [1 ]
Ozcanli, Haluk [2 ]
Sindel, Timur [3 ]
机构
[1] Akdeniz Univ, Fac Med, Dept Anat, TR-07070 Antalya, Turkey
[2] Akdeniz Univ, Fac Med, Dept Orthoped, TR-07070 Antalya, Turkey
[3] Akdeniz Univ, Fac Med, Dept Radiol, TR-07070 Antalya, Turkey
关键词
Accessory navicular bone; Normal variant; Incidence; Foot; Radiography; TIBIALIS POSTERIOR TENDON; CLINICAL-SIGNIFICANCE; IMAGING FINDINGS; SESAMOID BONES; FOOT; SYNCHONDROSIS; OSSICLES; ANKLE; FEET;
D O I
10.1007/s00276-009-0502-2
中图分类号
R602 [外科病理学、解剖学]; R32 [人体形态学];
学科分类号
100101 ;
摘要
Accessory ossicles are the skeletal variations of the ankle and foot that can cause painful syndromes. The accessory navicular bone is one of the most common accessory ossicle of the foot (4-21%) and is also known as os tibiale, os tibiale externum and os naviculare secundarium. This bone can be adjacent to the posteromedial tuberosity of the navicular bone or can be separated and may cause various diseases in the foot and mimic fractures of foot bones. The aim of this study was to document a detailed investigation of incidence and types of accessory navicular bones of Turkish subjects according to sex in both extremities. The accessory navicular bone was detected (11%) via the posterior-anterior radiographs of 650 subjects in the radiological examination. The incidences of accessory navicular bones were identified as 6.1-4.9% in female and male participants. Accessory navicular bones were classified into three groups as Type I, Type II and Type III and the incidences of these bones were determined as 3.3, 3.1, 4.6%, respectively. Each group was also divided into subgroups. The incidences of the subgroups are as Type Ia 0.6%, Type Ib 1.5%, Type Ic 1.2%, Type IIA/a 0.8%, Type IIA/b 0.4%, Type IIA/c 0%, Type IIB/a 1.1%, IIB/b 0.3%, IIB/c 0.5%, Type IIIa 1.5%, Type IIIb 1.4%, Type IIIc 1.7%. Finally, the types of accessory navicular bones were discussed and the imaging modalities for diagnosis were presented.
引用
收藏
页码:675 / 679
页数:5
相关论文
共 21 条
[1]   MR imaging findings of painful type II accessory navicular bone: Correlation with surgical and pathologic studies [J].
Choi, YS ;
Lee, KT ;
Kang, HS ;
Kim, EK .
KOREAN JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, 2004, 5 (04) :274-279
[2]   Incidence of accessory ossicles and sesamoid bones in the feet: a radiographic study of the Turkish subjects [J].
Coskun, Nigar ;
Yuksel, Mehtap ;
Cevener, Metin ;
Arican, R. Yavuz ;
Ozdemir, Hakan ;
Bircan, Oguz ;
Sindel, Timur ;
Ilgi, Sezgin ;
Sindel, Muzaffer .
SURGICAL AND RADIOLOGIC ANATOMY, 2009, 31 (01) :19-24
[3]  
Coughlin M., 2006, SURG FOOT ANKLE, V8th ed., P438
[4]   The Symptomatic Accessory Navicular Bone: A Report and Discussion of the Clinical Presentation [J].
Fredrick, Lori A. ;
Beall, Douglas P. ;
Ly, Justin Q. ;
Fish, Jon R. .
CURRENT PROBLEMS IN DIAGNOSTIC RADIOLOGY, 2005, 34 (02) :47-50
[5]   THE PAINFUL ACCESSORY NAVICULAR - A CLINICAL AND HISTOPATHOLOGICAL STUDY [J].
GROGAN, DP ;
GASSER, SI ;
OGDEN, JA .
FOOT & ANKLE, 1989, 10 (03) :164-169
[6]   Accessory navicular bone: when ankle pain does not originate from the ankle [J].
Issever, Ahi Sema ;
Minden, Kirsten ;
Eshed, Iris ;
Hermann, Kay-Geert A. .
CLINICAL RHEUMATOLOGY, 2007, 26 (12) :2143-2144
[7]  
Kiter E, 2000, J Orthop Sci, V5, P333, DOI 10.1007/s007760070039
[8]   Tibialis posterior tendon abnormalities in feet with accessory navicular bone and flatfoot [J].
Kiter, E ;
Erdag, N ;
Karatosun, V ;
Günal, I .
ACTA ORTHOPAEDICA SCANDINAVICA, 1999, 70 (06) :618-621
[9]   The relationship between the tibialis posterior tendon and the accessory navicular [J].
Kiter, E ;
Günal, I ;
Karatosun, V ;
Korman, E .
ANNALS OF ANATOMY-ANATOMISCHER ANZEIGER, 2000, 182 (01) :65-68
[10]   ACCESSORY BONES OF THE FOOT - CLINICAL-SIGNIFICANCE [J].
KRUSE, RW ;
CHEN, J .
MILITARY MEDICINE, 1995, 160 (09) :464-467