Definitive Chemoradiation for Rectal Cancer: Is There a Role for Dose Escalation? A National Cancer Database Study

被引:2
作者
Wegner, Rodney E. [1 ]
Hasan, Shaakir [1 ]
Renz, Paul B. [1 ]
Raj, Moses S. [2 ]
Monga, Dulabh K. [2 ]
Finley, Gene G. [2 ]
Kirichenko, Alexander V. [1 ]
McCormick, James T. [3 ]
机构
[1] Allegheny Hlth Network Canc Inst, Div Radiat Oncol, 320 E North Ave, Pittsburgh, PA 15212 USA
[2] Allegheny Hlth Network Canc Inst, Div Med Oncol, Pittsburgh, PA USA
[3] Allegheny Hlth Network, Div Colorectal Surg, Pittsburgh, PA USA
关键词
Chemoradiation; National Cancer Database; Rectal cancer; Watch and wait; MEDIAN FOLLOW-UP; PHASE-III TRIAL; POSTOPERATIVE CHEMORADIOTHERAPY; NEOADJUVANT CHEMORADIATION; PREOPERATIVE RADIOTHERAPY; THERAPY; WATCH; WAIT;
D O I
10.1097/DCR.0000000000001468
中图分类号
R57 [消化系及腹部疾病];
学科分类号
摘要
BACKGROUND: Surgery remains the standard of care in rectal cancer. Select patients will not undergo surgery for reasons such as medical inoperability or a watch-and-wait approach and instead are managed with definitive chemoradiation. OBJECTIVE: We used the National Cancer Database to identify overall survival and predictors thereof in the nonoperative management of patients with rectal cancer. DESIGN: This was a retrospective review. SETTINGS: This study used deidentified data from the National Cancer Database. PATIENTS: We queried the national cancer database from 2004 to 2014 for stage 1 to 3 rectal adenocarcinoma treated with only chemotherapy and radiation to definitive doses. Dose escalated therapy was defined as >54 Gy. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Univariable and multivariable analyses were performed to identify sociodemographic, treatment, and tumor characteristics predictive of dose escalation and overall survival. Propensity-adjusted Cox proportional hazard ratios for survival were used to account for indication bias. RESULTS: Among the 6311 patients eligible for the study, 11% were treated with doses >54 Gy. Earlier stage and increased age/comorbidity patients were more likely to receive dose escalation, and patients with more recent treatment and treatment at an academic facility were less likely. The median follow-up time was 31 months (range, 2-154 mo). Three- and 5-year overall survival rates for all patients were 60% and 46%. Patients treated with dose escalation had a median survival of 33 months compared with 56 months for those treated with <= 54 Gy (p < 0.0001). LIMITATIONS: The main limitation is the inherent selection bias present in National Cancer Database studies. Important treatment details and outcomes as they relate to a definitive chemoradiation approach in rectal cancer are lacking. Salvage therapy was also not recorded, which in this population could be surgery. CONCLUSIONS: In this analysis, dose escalation in the nonoperative management of rectal cancer was associated with a lower overall survival compared with more conventional doses. Careful patient selection and enrollment on appropriate clinical trials may be warranted in the nonoperative setting. See Video Abstract at http://links.lww.com/DCR/B15.
引用
收藏
页码:1336 / 1343
页数:8
相关论文
共 19 条
  • [1] Radiation Dose-Response Model for Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer After Preoperative Chemoradiation Therapy
    Appelt, Ane L.
    Ploen, John
    Vogelius, Ivan R.
    Bentzen, Soren M.
    Jakobsen, Anders
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2013, 85 (01): : 74 - 80
  • [2] Enhanced tumorocidal effect of chemotherapy with preoperative radiotherapy for rectal cancer: Preliminary results - EORTC 22921
    Bosset, JF
    Calais, G
    Mineur, L
    Maingon, P
    Radosevic-Jelic, L
    Daban, A
    Bardet, E
    Beny, A
    Briffaux, A
    Collette, L
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2005, 23 (24) : 5620 - 5627
  • [3] Impact of Intensity-Modulated Radiation Therapy Technique for Locally Advanced Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer: A Secondary Analysis of the NRG Oncology RTOG 0617 Randomized Clinical Trial
    Chun, Stephen G.
    Hu, Chen
    Choy, Hak
    Komaki, Ritsuko U.
    Timmerman, Robert D.
    Schild, Steven E.
    Bogart, Jeffrey A.
    Dobelbower, Michael C.
    Bosch, Walter
    Galvin, James M.
    Kavadi, Vivek S.
    Narayan, Samir
    Iyengar, Puneeth
    Robinson, Clifford G.
    Wynn, Raymond B.
    Raben, Adam
    Augspurger, Mark E.
    MacRae, RobertM.
    Paulus, Rebecca
    Bradley, Jeffrey D.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2017, 35 (01) : 56 - +
  • [4] COX DR, 1972, J R STAT SOC B, V34, P187
  • [5] D'Agostino RB, 1998, STAT MED, V17, P2265, DOI 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0258(19981015)17:19<2265::AID-SIM918>3.0.CO
  • [6] 2-B
  • [7] ADAPTING A CLINICAL COMORBIDITY INDEX FOR USE WITH ICD-9-CM ADMINISTRATIVE DATABASES
    DEYO, RA
    CHERKIN, DC
    CIOL, MA
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY, 1992, 45 (06) : 613 - 619
  • [8] Preoperative radiotherapy with or without concurrent fluorouracil and leucovorin in T3-4 rectal cancers:: Results of FFCD 9203
    Gerard, Jean-Pierre
    Conroy, Thierry
    Bonnetain, Franck
    Bouche, Olivier
    Chapet, Olivier
    Closon-Dejardin, Marie-Therese
    Untereiner, Michel
    Leduc, Bernard
    Francois, Eric
    Maurel, Jean
    Seitz, Jean-Francois
    Buecher, Bruno
    Mackiewicz, Remy
    Ducreux, Michel
    Bedenne, Laurent
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2006, 24 (28) : 4620 - 4625
  • [9] Habr-Gama Angelita, 2014, Recent Results Cancer Res, V203, P203, DOI 10.1007/978-3-319-08060-4_14
  • [10] Local Recurrence After Complete Clinical Response and Watch and Wait in Rectal Cancer After Neoadjuvant Chemoradiation: Impact of Salvage Therapy on Local Disease Control
    Habr-Gama, Angelita
    Gama-Rodrigues, Joaquim
    Sao Juliao, Guilherme P.
    Proscurshim, Igor
    Sabbagh, Charles
    Lynn, Patricio B.
    Perez, Rodrigo O.
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2014, 88 (04): : 822 - 828