Optimal management of wetlands: Quantifying trade-offs between flood risks, recreation, and biodiversity conservation

被引:42
作者
Birol, Ekin [1 ,2 ]
Hanley, Nick [3 ]
Koundouri, Phoebe [4 ]
Kountouris, Yiannis [4 ]
机构
[1] Int Food Policy Res Inst, Washington, DC 20006 USA
[2] Univ Cambridge, Dept Land Econ, Cambridge CB3 9EP, England
[3] Univ Stirling, Dept Econ, Stirling FK9 4LA, Scotland
[4] Athens Univ Econ & Business, DIEES, GR-10434 Athens, Greece
关键词
ENVIRONMENTAL PREFERENCE CLASSES; CHOICE EXPERIMENTS; ATTITUDINAL DATA; UPPER SILESIA; ANGLER CHARACTERISTICS; NONMARKET VALUATION; HETEROGENEITY; ATTRIBUTES; DESIGN; IMPROVEMENTS;
D O I
10.1029/2008WR006955
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
This paper employs a simple choice experiment to estimate the value of management options for the Bobrek wetland in Poland. The local public's valuation of several wetland management attributes, including flood risk reduction, biodiversity conservation and improvement of recreational access, are investigated. A latent class model is estimated to account for heterogeneity in the wetland management choices of the local public. The results reveal that there is considerable heterogeneity among the local public as two distinct segments are identified. For both of the segments, flood risk reduction, in the ranges considered, is more important than the other two attributes. The results of this study are expected to assist policy makers in undertaking effective flood risk reduction measures and formulating efficient, equitable and sustainable wetland management policies in accordance with the European Union's Water Framework Directive (2000/60/EC).
引用
收藏
页数:11
相关论文
共 56 条
[1]   Stated preference approaches for measuring passive use values: Choice experiments and contingent valuation [J].
Adamowicz, W ;
Boxall, P ;
Williams, M ;
Louviere, J .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL ECONOMICS, 1998, 80 (01) :64-75
[2]   Relating environmental attitudes and contingent values: how robust are methods for identifying preference heterogeneity? [J].
Aldrich, Gwendolyn A. ;
Grimsrud, Kristine M. ;
Thacher, Jennifer A. ;
Kotchen, Matthew J. .
ENVIRONMENTAL & RESOURCE ECONOMICS, 2007, 37 (04) :757-775
[3]   A comparison of segment retention criteria for finite mixture logit models [J].
Andrews, RL ;
Currim, IS .
JOURNAL OF MARKETING RESEARCH, 2003, 40 (02) :235-243
[4]  
[Anonymous], 2005, APPL CHOICE ANAL PRI
[5]  
Bateman I.J., 2003, Guidelines for the Use of Stated Preference Techniques for the Valuation of Preferences for Non-market Goods
[6]   AKAIKE LIKELIHOOD RATIO INDEX. [J].
Ben-Akiva, Moshe ;
Swait, Joffre .
1600, (20)
[7]   The value of badger populations and control of tuberculosis in cattle in England and Wales: A note [J].
Bennett, Richard ;
Willis, Ken .
JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL ECONOMICS, 2007, 58 (01) :152-156
[8]  
Birol E., 2008, Choice Experiments Informing Environmental Policy. A European Perspective, P12
[9]   Using choice experiments to design wetland management programmes: The case of Severn Estuary wetland, UK [J].
Birol, Ekin ;
Cox, Victoria .
JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL PLANNING AND MANAGEMENT, 2007, 50 (03) :363-380
[10]   Using a choice experiment to account for preference heterogeneity in wetland attributes: The case of Cheimaditida wetland in Greece [J].
Birol, Ekin ;
Karousakis, Katia ;
Koundouri, Phoebe .
ECOLOGICAL ECONOMICS, 2006, 60 (01) :145-156