Nonlocal momentum transfer in welcher weg measurements

被引:74
作者
Wiseman, HM
Harrison, FE
Collett, MJ
Tan, SM
Walls, DF
Killip, RB
机构
[1] UNIV QUEENSLAND, DEPT PHYS, ST LUCIA, QLD 4072, AUSTRALIA
[2] UNIV AUCKLAND, DEPT MATH, AUCKLAND, NEW ZEALAND
来源
PHYSICAL REVIEW A | 1997年 / 56卷 / 01期
关键词
D O I
10.1103/PhysRevA.56.55
中图分类号
O43 [光学];
学科分类号
070207 ; 0803 ;
摘要
A ''which-path'' (welcher Weg) measurement necessarily destroys the fringes in a double-slit interference experiment. We show that in all instances one may attribute this destruction to a disturbance of the particle's momentum by an amount equal to at least pi h/2d, where d is the slit separation, in accordance with the uncertainty principle. However, this momentum transfer need not be local; that is, it need not act at either of the slits through which the particle passes. For well-known welcher Weg measurements such as Einstein's recoiling slit and Feynman's light microscope, the disturbance can be understood in terms of random classical momentum kicks that act locally. In some recent proposals, including that by Scully, Englert, and Walther [Nature (London) 351, 111 (1991)], the momentum transfer is of a peculiarly quantum, nonlocal nature. In this paper we introduce a formalism based on the Wigner function, as this describes both the local and nonlocal momentum transfer caused by any welcher Weg measurement. We show that for some examples, such as that of Scully, Englert, and Walther, there is no momentum disturbance at the slits even though the nonlocal momentum disturbance is sufficient to destroy the interference pattern. Finally, we discuss the experimental signatures of nonlocal versus local momentum transfer and demonstrate a strong similarity to the nonlocality of the Aharonov-Bohm effect.
引用
收藏
页码:55 / 75
页数:21
相关论文
共 33 条
[1]   ATOM OPTICS [J].
ADAMS, CS ;
SIGEL, M ;
MLYNEK, J .
PHYSICS REPORTS-REVIEW SECTION OF PHYSICS LETTERS, 1994, 240 (03) :143-210
[2]   SIGNIFICANCE OF ELECTROMAGNETIC POTENTIALS IN THE QUANTUM THEORY [J].
AHARONOV, Y ;
BOHM, D .
PHYSICAL REVIEW, 1959, 115 (03) :485-491
[3]  
Bernstein S, 1923, CR HEBD ACAD SCI, V176, P1603
[4]   DECOHERENCE DUE TO THE GEOMETRIC PHASE IN A WELCHER-WEG EXPERIMENT [J].
BHANDARI, R .
PHYSICAL REVIEW LETTERS, 1992, 69 (26) :3720-3722
[5]   Some theorems on fourier transformsand conjugate trigonometric integrals [J].
Boas, R. P., Jr. .
TRANSACTIONS OF THE AMERICAN MATHEMATICAL SOCIETY, 1936, 40 (1-3) :287-308
[6]  
Bohr N., 1949, A EINSTEIN PHILOS SC, P200, DOI DOI 10.1016/S1876-0503(08)70379-7
[7]   MISINTERPRETATION OF AHARONOV-BOHM EFFECT [J].
BOYER, TH .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PHYSICS, 1972, 40 (01) :56-&
[8]  
Braginsky V. B., 1992, QUANTUM MEASUREMENT
[9]   PHOTON SCATTERING FROM ATOMS IN AN ATOM INTERFEROMETER - COHERENCE LOST AND REGAINED [J].
CHAPMAN, MS ;
HAMMOND, TD ;
LENEF, A ;
SCHMIEDMAYER, J ;
RUBENSTEIN, RA ;
SMITH, E ;
PRITCHARD, DE .
PHYSICAL REVIEW LETTERS, 1995, 75 (21) :3783-3787
[10]   HEISENBERG MICROSCOPE DECOHERENCE ATOM INTERFEROMETRY [J].
CLAUSER, JF ;
LI, SF .
PHYSICAL REVIEW A, 1994, 50 (03) :2430-2433