Expanding Therapeutic Jurisprudence Across the Federal Judiciary

被引:3
|
作者
Barsky, Benjamin A. [1 ,2 ]
Cucolo, Heather Ellis [3 ]
Sisti, Dominic A. [4 ]
机构
[1] Harvard Univ, Hlth Policy, Cambridge, MA 02138 USA
[2] Univ Penn, Scattergood Program Appl Eth Behav Hlth Care, Philadelphia, PA 19104 USA
[3] New York Law Sch, Law, New York, NY USA
[4] Univ Penn, Dept Med Eth & Hlth Policy, Perelman Sch Med, Philadelphia, PA 19104 USA
关键词
therapeutic jurisprudence; correctional mental health care; problem-solving courts; federal judiciary; criminal justice; law and mental health; DRUG COURTS; VETERANS; LITIGATION;
D O I
10.29158/JAAPL.200040-20
中图分类号
D9 [法律]; DF [法律];
学科分类号
0301 ;
摘要
A patchwork of drug courts and other problem-solving courts currently exists to divert individuals with mental illness and substance use disorders away from the criminal justice system. We call for a broader implementation of problem-solving courts, particularly at the federal level, that would operate according to the principles of therapeutic jurisprudence (i.e., a framework that aims to maximize the health benefits of judicial and legislative policies and practices). Expanding federal problem-solving courts will better serve individuals with mental illness and substance use disorders in the federal criminal justice system and allow them to benefit from rehabilitation and diversion programs. This effort will also signal that the federal judiciary has recognized the criminal justice system's failure to address inmate mental health care, and that it is willing to institute changes to provide appropriate, evidence-based interventions.
引用
收藏
页码:96 / 106
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条