A meta-analysis of interindividual differences in innovation

被引:36
作者
Amici, Federica [1 ,2 ]
Widdig, Anja [1 ,2 ]
Lehmann, Julia [3 ]
Majolo, Bonaventura [4 ]
机构
[1] Univ Leipzig, Fac Life Sci, Inst Biol, Behav Ecol Res Grp, Talstr 33, D-04103 Leipzig, Germany
[2] Max Planck Inst Evolutionary Anthropol, Dept Primatol, Jr Res Grp Primate Kin Select, Leipzig, Germany
[3] Univ Roehampton, Dept Life Sci, London, England
[4] Univ Lincoln, Sch Psychol, Lincoln, England
关键词
age; bad competitor hypothesis; excess of energy hypothesis; innovation; interindividual differences; intraspecific variation; personality; rank; sex; BEHAVIORAL FLEXIBILITY; BRAIN SIZE; TOOL USE; FORAGING BEHAVIOR; PONGO-PYGMAEUS; LARGER GROUPS; WILD BABOONS; SOCIAL RANK; BIRDS; NEOPHOBIA;
D O I
10.1016/j.anbehav.2019.07.008
中图分类号
B84 [心理学]; C [社会科学总论]; Q98 [人类学];
学科分类号
03 ; 0303 ; 030303 ; 04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
The ability to innovate and the social transmission of innovations have played a central role in human evolution. However, innovation is also crucial for other animals, by allowing them to cope with novel socioecological challenges. Although innovation plays such a central role in animals' lives, we still do not know the conditions required for innovative behaviour to emerge. Here, we focused on interindividual differences in innovation by (1) extensively reviewing existing literature on innovative behaviour in animals and (2) quantitatively testing the different evolutionary hypotheses that have been proposed to explain interindividual variation in innovation propensity during foraging tasks. We ran a series of phylogenetically controlled mixed-effects meta-regression models to determine which hypotheses (if any) are supported by currently available empirical studies. Our analyses show that innovation is more common in individuals that are older and belong to the larger sex, but also in more neophilic and/or explorative individuals. Moreover, these effects change depending on the study setting (i.e. wild versus captive). Our results provide no clear support to the excess of energy or the bad competitor hypotheses and suggest that study setting and interindividual differences in traits related to personality are also important predictors of innovation. (C) 2019 The Association for the Study of Animal Behaviour. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:257 / 268
页数:12
相关论文
共 135 条
[51]  
Galef Bennett G. Jr, 2003, P159, DOI 10.1017/CBO9780511584022.007
[52]   Review of methodology of quantitative reviews using meta-analysis in ecology [J].
Gates, S .
JOURNAL OF ANIMAL ECOLOGY, 2002, 71 (04) :547-557
[54]  
Greenberg Russell, 2003, P175
[55]   Bridging the Gap Between Cross-Taxon and Within-Species Analyses of Behavioral Innovations in Birds: Making Sense of Discrepant Cognition-Innovation Relationships and the Role of Motor Diversity [J].
Griffin, A. S. ;
Guez, D. .
ADVANCES IN THE STUDY OF BEHAVIOR, VOL 48, 2016, 48 :1-40
[56]   Innovativeness as an emergent property: a new alignment of comparative and experimental research on animal innovation [J].
Griffin, Andrea S. .
PHILOSOPHICAL TRANSACTIONS OF THE ROYAL SOCIETY B-BIOLOGICAL SCIENCES, 2016, 371 (1690)
[57]   Innovative problem solving in nonhuman animals: the effects of group size revisited [J].
Griffin, Andrea S. ;
Guez, David .
BEHAVIORAL ECOLOGY, 2015, 26 (03) :722-734
[58]   Innovative problem solving in birds: a cross-species comparison of two highly successful passerines [J].
Griffin, Andrea S. ;
Diquelou, Marie C. .
ANIMAL BEHAVIOUR, 2015, 100 :84-94
[59]   Innovation and problem solving: A review of common mechanisms [J].
Griffin, Andrea S. ;
Guez, David .
BEHAVIOURAL PROCESSES, 2014, 109 :121-134
[60]   Innovative problem solving in birds: a key role of motor diversity [J].
Griffin, Andrea S. ;
Diquelou, Marie ;
Perea, Marjorie .
ANIMAL BEHAVIOUR, 2014, 92 :221-227