Knowledge frontiers and boundaries in entrepreneurship research

被引:48
作者
Belitski, Maksim [1 ,2 ]
Caiazza, Rosa [3 ]
Lehmann, Erik E. [4 ]
机构
[1] Univ Reading, Henley Business Sch, Reading RG6 6UD, Berks, England
[2] ICD Int Business Sch, 12 Rue Alexandre Parodi, F-75010 Paris, France
[3] Parthenope Univ Naples, Naples, Italy
[4] Univ Augsburg, Fac Business & Econ, Univ Str 16, D-86159 Augsburg, Germany
关键词
Entrepreneurship; Knowledge Frontiers; Multi-level analysis; Knowledge spillover; Knowledge collaboration; INNOVATION; FIRMS; SPILLOVERS;
D O I
10.1007/s11187-019-00187-0
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
While the disruptive potential of knowledge has been receiving growing attention in small business economics and entrepreneurship research and application over the last decade, its boundaries and frontiers, including technological, spatial, institutional, cognitive, and cultural has not been fully explored. Here we present some reflections and a collection of papers on the role of knowledge investment across different cultural, institutional, geographical, and industrial contexts for this emerging area in entrepreneurship and management research. While being careful of the swift changes in knowledge creation, dissemination, and testing in a digital age, geography of knowledge diffusion, knowledge embeddedness into industries and places, skills, and strategies continue to change the way firms assimilate, absorb, create, and transfer knowledge. In this special issue, we extend our knowledge boundaries through knowledge collaboration theory, resource theory, open innovation theory, knowledge and creativity spillover of entrepreneurship theory, economic geography, and creative class and institutional theories. We give researchers and practitioners future directions for a very relevant and fast-growing area of entrepreneurship and small business research.
引用
收藏
页码:521 / 531
页数:11
相关论文
共 106 条
[1]  
ACS ZJ, 1988, AM ECON REV, V78, P678
[2]   Patents and innovation counts as measures of regional production of new knowledge [J].
Acs, ZJ ;
Anselin, L ;
Varga, A .
RESEARCH POLICY, 2002, 31 (07) :1069-1085
[3]   Entrepreneurship, institutional economics, and economic growth: an ecosystem perspective [J].
Acs, Zoltan J. ;
Estrin, Saul ;
Mickiewicz, Tomasz ;
Szerb, Laszlo .
SMALL BUSINESS ECONOMICS, 2018, 51 (02) :501-514
[4]   The lineages of the entrepreneurial ecosystem approach [J].
Acs, Zoltan J. ;
Stam, Erik ;
Audretsch, David B. ;
O'Connor, Allan .
SMALL BUSINESS ECONOMICS, 2017, 49 (01) :1-10
[5]   National Systems of Entrepreneurship: Measurement issues and policy implications [J].
Acs, Zoltan J. ;
Autio, Erkko ;
Szerb, Laszlo .
RESEARCH POLICY, 2014, 43 (03) :476-494
[6]  
Acs ZJ, 2009, SMALL BUS ECON, V32, P15, DOI [10.1007/s11187-008-9157-3, 10.1007/s11187-013-9505-9]
[7]   Knowledge sources of entrepreneurship: Firm formation by academic, user and employee innovators [J].
Agarwal, Rajshree ;
Shah, Sonali K. .
RESEARCH POLICY, 2014, 43 (07) :1109-1133
[8]  
[Anonymous], 2001, Industrial and Corporate Change, DOI [DOI 10.1093/ICC/10.1.267, 10.1093/icc/10.1.267]
[9]  
[Anonymous], 2006, MANAGE SCI, DOI [10.1287/mnsc.1050.0470, DOI 10.1287/mnsc.1050.0470]
[10]  
Audretsch D.B., 2010, Knowledge Intensive Entrepreneurship and Innovation Systems, P309