Accuracy of genomic breeding values revisited: Assessment of two established approaches and a novel one to determine the accuracy in two-step genomic prediction

被引:3
作者
Ni, G. [1 ,2 ]
Kipp, S. [3 ]
Simianer, H. [1 ]
Erbe, M. [1 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Georg August Univ, Anim Breeding & Genet Grp, Gottingen, Germany
[2] Univ New England, Sch Environm & Rural Sci, Armidale, NSW, Australia
[3] Vereinigte Informat Syst Tierhaltung Vit, Verden, Germany
[4] Bavarian State Res Ctr Agr, Inst Anim Breeding, Grub, Germany
关键词
accuracy; genomic prediction; simulation; DAUGHTER YIELD-DEVIATIONS; DAIRY-CATTLE; RELATIONSHIP MATRIX; GENETIC EVALUATIONS; SELECTION; RELIABILITY; MODEL; POPULATIONS; VALIDATION; LIVESTOCK;
D O I
10.1111/jbg.12273
中图分类号
S8 [畜牧、 动物医学、狩猎、蚕、蜂];
学科分类号
0905 ;
摘要
Selection decisions in genomic selection schemes are made based on genomic breeding values (GBV) of candidates. Thus, the accuracy of GBV is a relevant parameter, as it reflects the stability of prediction and the possibility that the GBV might change when more information becomes available. Accuracy of genomic prediction defined as the correlation between GBV and true breeding values (TBV), however, is difficult to assess, considering TBV of the candidates are not available in reality. In previous studies, several methods were proposed to assess the accuracy of GBV including methods using population parameters or parameters inferred from mixed-model equations. In practice, most approaches tended to overestimate the accuracy of genomic prediction. We thus tested approaches used in previous studies in order to assess the magnitude of bias. Analyses were performed based on simulated data under a variety of scenarios mimicking different livestock breeding programmes. Furthermore, we proposed a novel method and tested it both with simulated data and in a real Holstein data set. The new method provided a better prediction for the accuracy of GBV in the simulated scenarios.
引用
收藏
页码:242 / 255
页数:14
相关论文
共 29 条
[1]   Implications of avoiding overlap between training and testing data sets when evaluating genomic predictions of genetic merit [J].
Amer, P. R. ;
Banos, G. .
JOURNAL OF DAIRY SCIENCE, 2010, 93 (07) :3320-3330
[2]   Accuracies of estimated breeding values from ordinary genetic evaluations do not reflect the correlation between true and estimated breeding values in selected populations [J].
Bijma, P. .
JOURNAL OF ANIMAL BREEDING AND GENETICS, 2012, 129 (05) :345-358
[3]   Genomic Prediction in Animals and Plants: Simulation of Data, Validation, Reporting, and Benchmarking [J].
Daetwyler, Hans D. ;
Calus, Mario P. L. ;
Pong-Wong, Ricardo ;
de los Campos, Gustavo ;
Hickey, John M. .
GENETICS, 2013, 193 (02) :347-+
[4]   The Impact of Genetic Architecture on Genome-Wide Evaluation Methods [J].
Daetwyler, Hans D. ;
Pong-Wong, Ricardo ;
Villanueva, Beatriz ;
Woolliams, John A. .
GENETICS, 2010, 185 (03) :1021-1031
[5]   ASYMPTOTIC RESPONSE TO SELECTION ON BEST LINEAR UNBIASED PREDICTORS OF BREEDING VALUES [J].
DEKKERS, JCM .
ANIMAL PRODUCTION, 1992, 54 :351-360
[6]   A Function Accounting for Training Set Size and Marker Density to Model the Average Accuracy of Genomic Prediction [J].
Erbe, Malena ;
Gredler, Birgit ;
Seefried, Franz Reinhold ;
Bapst, Beat ;
Simianer, Henner .
PLOS ONE, 2013, 8 (12)
[7]  
Falconer D.S., 1996, Quantitative Genetics, V4th
[8]   Changes in genetic selection differentials and generation intervals in US Holstein dairy cattle as a result of genomic selection [J].
Garcia-Ruiz, Adriana ;
Cole, John B. ;
VanRaden, Paul M. ;
Wiggans, George R. ;
Ruiz-Lopez, Felipe J. ;
Van Tassell, Curtis P. .
PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 2016, 113 (28) :E3995-E4004
[9]  
Gilmour A., 2009, ASREML USER GUIDE
[10]   Using the genomic relationship matrix to predict the accuracy of genomic selection [J].
Goddard, M. E. ;
Hayes, B. J. ;
Meuwissen, T. H. E. .
JOURNAL OF ANIMAL BREEDING AND GENETICS, 2011, 128 (06) :409-421