Simplistic understandings of farmer motivations could undermine the environmental potential of the common agricultural policy

被引:127
作者
Brown, Calum [1 ]
Kovacs, Eszter [2 ]
Herzon, Irina [3 ,4 ]
Villamayor-Tomas, Sergio [5 ]
Albizua, Amaia [6 ]
Galanaki, Antonia [7 ]
Grammatikopoulou, Ioanna [8 ,9 ]
McCracken, Davy [10 ]
Olsson, Johanna Alkan [11 ]
Zinngrebe, Yves [12 ,13 ]
机构
[1] IMK IFU, Karlsruhe Inst Technol, Kreuzeckbahnstr 19, D-82467 Garmisch Partenkirchen, Germany
[2] UCL, Dept Geog, Gower St, London WC1E 6BT, England
[3] Univ Helsinki, Dept Agr Sci, POB 27, FI-00014 Helsinki, Finland
[4] Univ Helsinki, HELSUS, PO 20,Box 65, FI-00014 Helsinki, Finland
[5] Autonomous Univ Barcelona, Edifici ICTA ICP, ICTA, Carrer Columns S-N, Barcelona 08193, Spain
[6] Basque Ctr Climate Change BC3, Edificio Sede 1,1 Planta 1,Parque Cient UPV EHU, Leioa 48940, Bizkaia, Spain
[7] Aristotle Univ Thessaloniki, Sch Biol, Dept Zool, GR-54124 Thessaloniki, Greece
[8] Czech Acad Sci, Global Change Res Inst, Prague, Czech Republic
[9] Nat Resources Inst Finland LUKE, Helsinki, Finland
[10] Scotlands Rural Coll, Hill & Mt Res Ctr, Kirkton Farm, Crianlarich FK20 8RU, Scotland
[11] Lund Univ, Ctr Environm & Climate Res, Solvegatan 37, S-22362 Lund, Sweden
[12] UFZ Helmholtz Ctr Environm Res, Dept Conservat Biol, Permoserstr 15, D-04318 Leipzig, Germany
[13] Univ Gottingen, Dept Agr Econ & Rural Dev, Pl Gottinger Sieben 5, D-37073 Gottingen, Germany
关键词
Agri-environment; Farmer decision-making; Environmental payments; Ecological focus areas; Greening; Common agricultural policy; BIODIVERSITY CONSERVATION; RURAL LANDSCAPE; FARMLAND BIRDS; NATURA; 2000; SCHEMES; PARTICIPATION; PREFERENCES; DESIGN; ADOPTION; AREAS;
D O I
10.1016/j.landusepol.2020.105136
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
The European Union Common Agricultural Policy (CAP) has failed to achieve its aim of preserving European farmland biodiversity, despite massive investment in subsidies to incentivise environmentally-beneficial farming practices. This failure calls into question the design of the subsidy schemes, which are intended to either function as a safety net and make farming profitable or compensate farmers for costs and loss of income while undertaking environmental management. In this study, we assess whether the design of environmental payments in the CAP reflects current knowledge about farmers' decision-making as found in the research literature. We do so on the basis of a comprehensive literature review on farmers' uptake of agri-environmental management practices over the past 10 years and interviews specifically focused on Ecological Focus Areas with policy-makers, advisors and farmers in seven European countries. We find that economic and structural factors are the most commonly identified determinants of farmers' adoption of environmental management practices in the literature and in interviews. However, the literature suggests that these are complemented by - and partially dependent on - a broad range of social, attitudinal and other contextual factors that are not recognised in interview responses or, potentially, in policy design. The relatively simplistic conceptualisation of farmer behaviour that underlies some aspects of policy design may hamper the effectiveness of environmental payments in the CAP by overemphasising economic considerations, potentially corroding farmer attitudes to policy and environmental objectives. We conclude that an urgent redesign of agricultural subsidies is needed to better align them with the economic, social and environmental factors affecting farmer decision-making in a complex production climate, and therefore to maximise potential environmental benefits.
引用
收藏
页数:15
相关论文
共 118 条
[1]   Farmers' Preferences and Social Capital Regarding Agri-environmental Schemes to Protect Birds [J].
Allo, Maria ;
Loureiro, Maria L. ;
Iglesias, Eva .
JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL ECONOMICS, 2015, 66 (03) :672-689
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2011, AGR RUR DEV
[3]  
[Anonymous], 1998, Development of Freedom
[4]  
[Anonymous], 2016, Amended Directives and Procedures
[5]  
Arata L, 2016, LAND ECON, V92, P167, DOI 10.3368/le.92.1.167
[6]   Investigating farmers' preferences for alternative PES schemes for carbon sequestration in UK agroecosystems [J].
Aslam, Uzma ;
Termansen, Mette ;
Fleskens, Luuk .
ECOSYSTEM SERVICES, 2017, 27 :103-112
[7]   Does intensity of change matter? Factors affecting adoption of agri-environmental schemes in Spain [J].
Barreiro-Hurle, Jesus ;
Espinosa-Goded, Maria ;
Dupraz, Pierre .
JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL PLANNING AND MANAGEMENT, 2010, 53 (07) :891-905
[8]   Leverage Points for Governing Agricultural Soils: A Review of Empirical Studies of European Farmers' Decision-Making [J].
Bartkowski, Bartosz ;
Bartke, Stephan .
SUSTAINABILITY, 2018, 10 (09)
[9]   The role of agri-environment schemes in conservation and environmental management [J].
Batary, Peter ;
Dicks, Lynn V. ;
Kleijn, David ;
Sutherland, William J. .
CONSERVATION BIOLOGY, 2015, 29 (04) :1006-1016
[10]  
Blumentrath C., 2014, AGRI ENV POLICIES TH