Powder Flow Measurement Comparison between two ring shear testers

被引:0
|
作者
Jaeda, Hind [1 ]
Knop, Kjaus [1 ]
Kleinebudde, Peter [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Dusseldorf, Inst Pharmaceut & Biopharmaceut, D-40225 Dusseldorf, Germany
来源
PHARMAZEUTISCHE INDUSTRIE | 2009年 / 71卷 / 07期
关键词
Binary mixtures; Consolidation stress; Flowability; Glidants; Ring shear testers; Unconfined yield strength; BULK SOLIDS;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
R9 [药学];
学科分类号
1007 ;
摘要
Shear testers are the internationally recognized means to measure the flow properties of cohesive bulk solids. They were used lately for assessment of the flow behaviour of different pharmaceutical excipients and active ingredients in many pharmaceutical research groups. In this work two automated Schulze ring shear testers were compared. The Schulze testers are direct shear testers with rotational displacement and unlimited strain. The Schulze shear tester RST-01.pc (larger tester) and the Schulze shear tester RST-XS (smaller tester) were compared. In this study a 200 ml shear cell was used for the measurements carried out on the RST-01.pc tester while a 30 ml shear cell was used for the measurements on the RST-XS tester. A set of binary mixtures of different active ingredients and excipients were prepared and a total of 189 measurements were carried out on each tester. Both testers led to low ffc values with cohesive mixtures and high ffc values with easy flowing mixtures. However, ffc values more than 10 were not used because these values were highly fluctuating; besides they still refer to a free flowing mixture. The easy flowing mixtures showed a broader ffc scatter while the more cohesive powders showed a narrower scatter on both testers. Comparing the ffc values of both testers showed that the results were well correlated with a correlation coefficient r = 0.97. However, the smaller (RST-XS) tester showed slightly lower ffc values compared to the larger (RST-01.pc) tester. For comparative tests this effect does not play a role as long as the same ring shear tester with the same shear cell size is used throughout the measurements. However, an advantage of the smaller (RST-XS) tester is that a smaller amount of bulk solid is required for the test.
引用
收藏
页码:1221 / +
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Comparison of three-dimensional and two-dimensional statistical mechanics of shear layers for flow between two parallel plates
    L. Shirkov
    V. Berdichevsky
    Continuum Mechanics and Thermodynamics, 2013, 25 : 269 - 272
  • [32] Hydrodynamic interaction between two nonspherical capsules in shear flow
    Duc-Vinh Le
    Chiam, K. -H.
    PHYSICAL REVIEW E, 2011, 84 (05):
  • [33] Measurement on the Shear Property Parameters of the Eruption Powder
    Li, Jianqiao
    Li, Xiujuan
    Li, Hao
    Du, Sanhu
    Fan, Shichao
    MEASUREMENT AND CONTROL OF GRANULAR MATERIALS, 2012, 508 : 55 - +
  • [34] CIRP form measurement international comparison including CMMs and form testers
    Jusko, O
    Kunzmann, H
    METROLOGIA, 2000, 37 (04) : 345 - 346
  • [35] Flow birefringence measurement between two rotating rolls
    vonBose, S
    Mewes, D
    1996 ICHEME RESEARCH EVENT - SECOND EUROPEAN CONFERENCE FOR YOUNG RESEARCHERS IN CHEMICAL ENGINEERING, VOLS 1 AND 2, 1996, : 913 - 915
  • [36] MEASUREMENT METHOD OF THE POWDER FLOW CONDITION BETWEEN A MOLD AND A CC SLAB .1. THE DEVELOPMENT OF THE POWDER FILM THICKNESS MEASUREMENT
    NAKAMORI, Y
    ICHIKO, O
    WASITANI, T
    TRANSACTIONS OF THE IRON AND STEEL INSTITUTE OF JAPAN, 1983, 23 (12) : B404 - B404
  • [37] MEASUREMENT OF FLOW DIRECTION IN A SHEAR-FLOW
    DIXON, SL
    JOURNAL OF PHYSICS E-SCIENTIFIC INSTRUMENTS, 1978, 11 (01): : 31 - 34
  • [38] Atrial strain measurement: comparison between the two methods
    Cameli, M.
    Iardino, E.
    Loiacono, F.
    Focardi, M.
    D'Ascenzi, F.
    Mondillo, S.
    EUROPEAN HEART JOURNAL, 2016, 37 : 258 - 258
  • [39] Comparison between two measurement systems for triglyceride in Korea
    Lim, J.
    Kwon, G. C.
    CLINICA CHIMICA ACTA, 2022, 530 : S427 - S428
  • [40] Comparison between two carbonyl measurement methods in the atmosphere
    Ferrari, CP
    Durand-Jolibois, R
    Carlier, P
    Jacob, V
    Roche, A
    Foster, P
    Fresnet, P
    ANALUSIS, 1999, 27 (01) : 45 - 53