Human health as a motivator for climate change mitigation: results from four European high-income countries

被引:46
作者
Amelung, Dorothee [1 ]
Fischer, Helen [1 ]
Herrmann, Alina [2 ]
Aall, Carlo [4 ]
Louis, Valerie R. [2 ]
Becher, Heiko [5 ]
Wilkinson, Paul [3 ]
Sauerborn, Rainer [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Hosp Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
[2] Univ Hosp Heidelberg, Inst Publ Hlth, Heidelberg, Germany
[3] London Sch Hyg & Trop Med, London, England
[4] Western Norway Res Inst, Sogndal, Norway
[5] Univ Med Ctr Hamburg Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
来源
GLOBAL ENVIRONMENTAL CHANGE-HUMAN AND POLICY DIMENSIONS | 2019年 / 57卷
基金
瑞典研究理事会;
关键词
Climate change; Health co-benefits; Mitigation; Household preferences; Health; Behavior; BEHAVIOR; POLICIES; ENERGY;
D O I
10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2019.05.002
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Invoking health benefits to promote climate-friendly household behavior has three unique advantages: (i) health co-benefits accrue directly to the acting individual, they are "private goods" rather than public ones; (ii) the evidence base for, and magnitude of health co-benefits is well-established; and (iii) the idea of a healthy life-style is well-engrained in public discourse, much more so than that of a climate-friendly life-style. In previous research, assessing the influence of information on health effects on people's motivation to adopt mitigation actions, health co-benefits for the individual were typically confounded with collective health co-benefits, for example from pollution reduction. The present research aims to overcome this limitation by providing information on individual health co-benefits that are unconditional on the actions of others (direct health co-benefits). We report effects of this kind of health information on stated willingness to adopt mitigation actions as well as on simulation-based carbon emission reductions in a pre-registered experimental setting among 308 households in 4 mid-size case-study cities in 4 European high-income countries: France, Germany, Norway and Sweden. For each mitigation action from the sectors food, housing, and mobility, half of the sample received the amount of CO2 equivalents (CO2-eq) saved and the financial costs or savings the respective action generated. The other half additionally received information on direct health co-benefits, where applicable. For households receiving information on direct health co-benefits, we find a higher mean willingness to adopt food and housing actions, and a greater proportion very willing to adopt one or more mitigation actions (OR 1.86, 95% CI 1.1, 3.12); and a greater simulated reduction in overall carbon footprint: difference in percent reduction -2.70%, (95% CI -5.34, -0.04) overall and -4.45%, (95% CI -8.26, -0.64) for food. Our study is the first to show that providing information on strictly unconditional, individual health co-benefits can motivate households in high-income countries to adopt mitigation actions.
引用
收藏
页数:9
相关论文
共 34 条
  • [1] [Anonymous], 2002, SURV PUBL ATT QUAL L
  • [2] [Anonymous], NAT SCI SOCIA TA S
  • [3] [Anonymous], PSYCHOL CAR AUTOMOBI
  • [4] [Anonymous], GLOB HLTH ACTION
  • [5] [Anonymous], 2013, RISK ANAL HUMAN BEHA
  • [6] [Anonymous], CONSUMPTION A MISSIN
  • [7] Impact of a reduced red and processed meat dietary pattern on disease risks and greenhouse gas emissions in the UK: a modelling study
    Aston, Louise M.
    Smith, James N.
    Powles, John W.
    [J]. BMJ OPEN, 2012, 2 (05):
  • [8] Bain PG, 2016, NAT CLIM CHANGE, V6, P154, DOI [10.1038/nclimate2814, 10.1038/NCLIMATE2814]
  • [9] Promoting pro-environmental action in climate change deniers
    Bain, Paul G.
    Hornsey, Matthew J.
    Bongiorno, Renata
    Jeffries, Carla
    [J]. NATURE CLIMATE CHANGE, 2012, 2 (08) : 600 - 603
  • [10] Bernauer T, 2016, NAT CLIM CHANGE, V6, P680, DOI [10.1038/NCLIMATE2948, 10.1038/nclimate2948]