Effects of focal frontal lesions on response inhibition

被引:280
作者
Picton, Terence W. [1 ]
Stuss, Donald T.
Alexander, Michael P.
Shallice, Tim
Binns, Malcolm A.
Gillingham, Susan
机构
[1] Rotman Res Inst Baycrest, Toronto, ON M6A 2E1, Canada
[2] Univ Toronto, Dept Med, Toronto, ON M5S 1A1, Canada
[3] Univ Toronto, Dept Psychol, Toronto, ON M5S 1A1, Canada
[4] Beth Israel Deaconess Med Ctr, Boston, MA 02215 USA
[5] Harvard Univ, Sch Med, Dept Neurol, Boston, MA 02115 USA
[6] Scuola Int Super Studi Avanzati, Cognit Neuropsychol & Neuroimaging Lab, Trieste, Italy
[7] UCL, Inst Cognit Neurosci, London WC1E 6BT, England
基金
加拿大健康研究院;
关键词
anterior cingulate; lesion localization; nogo paradigm; premotor cortex; supplementary motor areas;
D O I
10.1093/cercor/bhk031
中图分类号
Q189 [神经科学];
学科分类号
071006 ;
摘要
This study examined the performance of 38 normal subjects and 43 patients with focal lesions of the frontal lobes on a simple go-nogo task where the probability of the nogo stimulus was either 75% or 25%. Patients with lesions to the superior medial parts of the frontal lobes, in particular to the left superior portion of Brodmann area 6 (which includes the supplementary motor areas and the premotor areas for the right hand) had an increased number of false alarms (incorrect responses to the nogo stimulus). These results indicate that area 6 is specifically involved in the inhibition of response. Patients with lesions to the right anterior cingulate (areas 24 and 32) were slower and more variable in their reaction time. These findings could be explained by an inability to sustain stimulus-response contingencies. Lesions to the right ventrolateral prefrontal cortex (Brodmann areas 44, 45, 47) also increased the variability of response, perhaps by disrupting monitoring performance.
引用
收藏
页码:826 / 838
页数:13
相关论文
共 87 条
[1]   Impaired concentration due to frontal lobe damage from two distinct lesion sites [J].
Alexander, MP ;
Stuss, DT ;
Shallice, T ;
Picton, TW ;
Gillingham, S .
NEUROLOGY, 2005, 65 (04) :572-579
[2]   The cognitive neuroscience of response inhibition: Relevance for genetic research in attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder [J].
Aron, AR ;
Poldrack, RA .
BIOLOGICAL PSYCHIATRY, 2005, 57 (11) :1285-1292
[3]   Stop-signal inhibition disrupted by damage to right inferior frontal gyrus in humans [J].
Aron, AR ;
Fletcher, PC ;
Bullmore, ET ;
Sahakian, BJ ;
Robbins, TW .
NATURE NEUROSCIENCE, 2003, 6 (02) :115-116
[4]   Inhibition and the right inferior frontal cortex [J].
Aron, AR ;
Robbins, TW ;
Poldrack, RA .
TRENDS IN COGNITIVE SCIENCES, 2004, 8 (04) :170-177
[5]   A componential analysis of task-switching deficits associated with lesions of left and right frontal cortex [J].
Aron, AR ;
Monsell, S ;
Sahakian, BJ ;
Robbins, TW .
BRAIN, 2004, 127 :1561-1573
[6]   The role of higher-order motor areas in voluntary movement as revealed by high-resolution EEG and fMRI [J].
Ball, T ;
Schreiber, A ;
Feige, B ;
Wagner, M ;
Lücking, CH ;
Kristeva-Feige, R .
NEUROIMAGE, 1999, 10 (06) :682-694
[7]   Cognitive control involved in overcoming prepotent response tendencies and switching between tasks [J].
Barber, AD ;
Carter, CS .
CEREBRAL CORTEX, 2005, 15 (07) :899-912
[8]   Voxel-based lesion-symptom mapping [J].
Bates, E ;
Wilson, SM ;
Saygin, AP ;
Dick, F ;
Sereno, MI ;
Knight, RT ;
Dronkers, NF .
NATURE NEUROSCIENCE, 2003, 6 (05) :448-450
[9]   The functional neuroanatomical correlates of response variability: evidence from a response inhibition task [J].
Bellgrove, MA ;
Hester, R ;
Garavan, H .
NEUROPSYCHOLOGIA, 2004, 42 (14) :1910-1916
[10]   Anterior cingulate cortex and response conflict: Effects of frequency, inhibition and errors [J].
Braver, TS ;
Barch, DM ;
Gray, JR ;
Molfese, DL ;
Snyder, A .
CEREBRAL CORTEX, 2001, 11 (09) :825-836