Set-up and docking of the da Vinci® surgical system: prospective analysis of initial experience

被引：51

作者：

Iranmanesh, Pouya ^{[1
]}

Morel, Philippe ^{[1
]}

Wagner, Oliver J. ^{[1
]}

Inan, Ihsan ^{[1
]}

Pugin, Francois ^{[1
]}

Hagen, Monika E. ^{[1
]}

机构：

[1] Univ Hosp Geneva, Dept Digest Surg, CH-1211 Geneva, Switzerland

来源：

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MEDICAL ROBOTICS AND COMPUTER ASSISTED SURGERY | 2010年 / 6卷 / 01期

关键词：

robotic surgery; robot; docking; draping; set-up; da Vinci (R); ROBOTIC SURGERY; CHOLECYSTECTOMY;

D O I：

10.1002/rcs.288

中图分类号：

R61 [外科手术学];

学科分类号：

摘要：

Background Set-up and docking of the da Vinci (R) surgical system are assumed to extend overall operating times. We hypothesized that these tasks could be achieved in adequate times. Therefore, a prospective analysis of set-up and docking times of the da Vinci (R) Surgical System was conducted. Methods We prospectively analysed set-up and docking times with the da Vinci surgical system in our division. Results Ninety-six patients were operated on over 30 months in our institution. Median set-up time was 22 (range 9-50) min and median docking time was 10 (range 2-70) min. Surgeons with previous docking experience were significantly faster than inexperienced surgeons: 8 (range 2-50) vs. 17.5 (range 10-70) min. Both set-up and docking showed a fast learning curve. Conclusion The data support the conclusion that both set-up and docking of the robot can be achieved in adequate times and have a low impact on overall operating time. Copyright (C) 2010 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

引用

页码：57 / 60

页数：4

共 20 条

[11] A prospective study comparing operative time in conventional laparoscopic and robotically assisted Thal semifundoplication in children [J].

Lehnert, Mark ;

Richter, Bernd ;

Beyer, Peter A. ;

Heller, Klaus .

JOURNAL OF PEDIATRIC SURGERY, 2006, 41 (08) :1392-1396

[12] Computer-enhanced vs. standard laparoscopic antireflux surgery [J].

Melvin, WS ;

Needleman, B ;

Krause, KR ;

Schneider, C ;

Ellison, EC .

JOURNAL OF GASTROINTESTINAL SURGERY, 2002, 6 (01) :11-15

[13] Robot-assisted versus conventional laparoscopic fundoplication:: short-term outcome of a pilot randomized controlled trial [J].

Mueller-Stich, B. P. ;

Reiter, M. A. ;

Wente, M. N. ;

Bintintan, V. V. ;

Koeninger, J. ;

Buechler, M. W. ;

Gutt, C. N. .

SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY AND OTHER INTERVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES, 2007, 21 (10) :1800-1805

[14] DaVinci® robotic-assisted laparoscopic bariatric surgery:: Is it justified in a routine setting? [J].

Mühlmann, G ;

Klaus, A ;

Kirchmayr, W ;

Wykypiel, H ;

Unger, A ;

Höller, E ;

Nehoda, H ;

Aigner, F ;

Weiss, HG .

OBESITY SURGERY, 2003, 13 (06) :848-854

[15]

Nezhat Camran, 2006, JSLS, V10, P317

[16] Robotic Partial Nephrectomy for Renal Hilar Tumors: A Multi-Institutional Analysis [J].

Rogers, Craig G. ;

Metwalli, Adam ;

Blatt, Adam M. ;

Bratslavsky, Gennady ;

Menon, Mani ;

Linehan, W. Marston ;

Pinto, Peter A. .

JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2008, 180 (06) :2353-2356

[17]

Ruurda Jelle P, 2003, Comput Aided Surg, V8, P24, DOI 10.3109/10929080309146099

[18] A prospective analysis of 211 robotic-assisted surgical procedures [J].

Talamini, MA ;

Chapman, S ;

Horgan, S ;

Melvin, WS .

SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY AND OTHER INTERVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES, 2003, 17 (10) :1521-1524

[19] Robotic cholecystectomy: Learning curve, advantages, and limitations [J].

Vidovszky, Tamas J. ;

Smith, William ;

Ghosh, Jagannath ;

Ali, Mohamed R. .

JOURNAL OF SURGICAL RESEARCH, 2006, 136 (02) :172-178

[20] Robotic computer-assisted pyeloplasty versus conventional laparoscopic pyeloplasty [J].

Weise, Erik S. ;

Winfield, Howard N. .

JOURNAL OF ENDOUROLOGY, 2006, 20 (10) :813-819

← 1 2 →