A network analysis of the volatility of high dimensional financial series

被引:63
作者
Barigozzi, Matteo [1 ]
Hallin, Marc [2 ]
机构
[1] London Sch Econ & Polit Sci, London, England
[2] Univ Libre Bruxelles, Brussels, Belgium
基金
英国工程与自然科学研究理事会;
关键词
Dynamic factor models; Sparse vector auto-regression models; Standard & Poor's 100 index; Systemic risk; Volatility; DYNAMIC-FACTOR MODEL; TIME-SERIES; COVARIANCE ESTIMATION; AGGREGATE FLUCTUATIONS; VECTOR AUTOREGRESSIONS; PRINCIPAL COMPONENTS; VARIABLE SELECTION; LARGE NUMBER; LASSO; REGRESSION;
D O I
10.1111/rssc.12177
中图分类号
O21 [概率论与数理统计]; C8 [统计学];
学科分类号
020208 ; 070103 ; 0714 ;
摘要
Interconnectedness between stocks and firms plays a crucial role in the volatility contagion phenomena that characterize financial crises, and graphs are a natural tool in their analysis. We propose graphical methods for an analysis of volatility interconnections in the Standard & Poor's 100 data set during the period 2000-2013, which contains the 2007-2008 Great Financial Crisis. The challenges are twofold: first, volatilities are not directly observed and must be extracted from time series of stock returns; second, the observed series, with about 100 stocks, is high dimensional, and curse-of-dimensionality problems are to be faced. To overcome this double challenge, we propose a dynamic factor model methodology, decomposing the panel into a factor-driven and an idiosyncratic component modelled as a sparse vector auto-regressive model. The inversion of this auto-regression, along with suitable identification constraints, produces networks in which, for a given horizon h, the weight associated with edge (i, j) represents the h-step-ahead forecast error variance of variable i accounted for by variable j's innovations. Then, we show how those graphs yield an assessment of how systemic each firm is. They also demonstrate the prominent role of financial firms as sources of contagion during the 2007-2008 crisis.
引用
收藏
页码:581 / 605
页数:25
相关论文
共 64 条
[1]   Sparse time series chain graphical models for reconstructing genetic networks [J].
Abegaz, Fentaw ;
Wit, Ernst .
BIOSTATISTICS, 2013, 14 (03) :586-599
[2]   LOCALISED AND BIASED TECHNOLOGIES: ATKINSON AND STIGLITZ'S NEW VIEW, INDUCED INNOVATIONS, AND DIRECTED TECHNOLOGICAL CHANGE [J].
Acemoglu, Daron .
ECONOMIC JOURNAL, 2015, 125 (583) :443-463
[3]   The Network Origins of Aggregate Fluctuations [J].
Acemoglu, Daron ;
Carvalho, Vasco M. ;
Ozdaglar, Asuman ;
Tahbaz-Salehi, Alireza .
ECONOMETRICA, 2012, 80 (05) :1977-2016
[4]   Capital Shortfall: A New Approach to Ranking and Regulating Systemic Risks [J].
Acharya, Viral ;
Engle, Robert ;
Richardson, Matthew .
AMERICAN ECONOMIC REVIEW, 2012, 102 (03) :59-64
[5]  
Adamic Lada A., 2005, P 3 INT WORKSHOP LIN, V3, P36, DOI DOI 10.1145/1134271.1134277
[6]   CoVaR [J].
Adrian, Tobias ;
Brunnermeier, Markus K. .
AMERICAN ECONOMIC REVIEW, 2016, 106 (07) :1705-1741
[7]   Modeling and forecasting realized volatility [J].
Andersen, TG ;
Bollerslev, T ;
Diebold, FX ;
Labys, P .
ECONOMETRICA, 2003, 71 (02) :579-625
[8]   Determining the number of factors in approximate factor models [J].
Bai, JS ;
Ng, S .
ECONOMETRICA, 2002, 70 (01) :191-221
[9]  
Barigozzi M., 2016, NETS NETWORK ESTIMAT
[10]   Generalized dynamic factor models and volatilities: recovering the market volatility shocks [J].
Barigozzi, Matteo ;
Hallin, Marc .
ECONOMETRICS JOURNAL, 2016, 19 (01) :C33-C60