Information Integration in Modulation of Pragmatic Inferences During Online Language Comprehension

被引:23
作者
Ryskin, Rachel [1 ,2 ]
Kurumada, Chigusa [3 ]
Brown-Schmidt, Sarah [4 ]
机构
[1] MIT, Dept Brain & Cognit Sci, 43 Vassar St,46-3037, Cambridge, MA 02139 USA
[2] Boston Univ, Dept Speech Language & Hearing Sci, Boston, MA 02215 USA
[3] Univ Rochester, Dept Brain & Cognit Sci, Rochester, NY 14627 USA
[4] Vanderbilt Univ, Dept Psychol & Human Dev, 221 Kirkland Hall, Nashville, TN 37235 USA
基金
美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
Language comprehension; Pragmatics; Eye-tracking; CONTEXT-DEPENDENT MEMORY; SEMANTIC INTERPRETATION; REFERRING EXPRESSIONS; PERSPECTIVE-TAKING; MECHANISMS; EXPERIENCE; MODELS;
D O I
10.1111/cogs.12769
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
Upon hearing a scalar adjective in a definite referring expression such as "the big horizontal ellipsis ," listeners typically make anticipatory eye movements to an item in a contrast set, such as a big glass in the context of a smaller glass. Recent studies have suggested that this rapid, contrastive interpretation of scalar adjectives is malleable and calibrated to the speaker's pragmatic competence. In a series of eye-tracking experiments, we explore the nature of the evidence necessary for the modulation of pragmatic inferences in language comprehension, focusing on the complementary roles of top-down information - (knowledge about the particular speaker's pragmatic competence) and bottom-up cues (distributional information about the use of scalar adjectives in the environment). We find that bottom-up evidence alone (e.g., the speaker says "the big dog" in a context with one dog), in large quantities, can be sufficient to trigger modulation of the listener's contrastive inferences, with or without top-down cues to support this adaptation. Further, these findings suggest that listeners track and flexibly combine multiple sources of information in service of efficient pragmatic communication.
引用
收藏
页数:35
相关论文
共 57 条
[51]  
Tarenskeen S, 2015, FRONT PSYCHOL, V6, DOI [10.3389/fpsyd.2015.01703, 10.3389/fpsyg.2015.01703]
[52]   Lexical entrainment and lexical differentiation in reference phrase choice [J].
Van der Wege, Mija M. .
JOURNAL OF MEMORY AND LANGUAGE, 2009, 60 (04) :448-463
[53]   Interpreting Pitch Accents in Online Comprehension: H* vs. L plus H* [J].
Watson, Duane G. ;
Tanenhaus, Michael K. ;
Gunlogson, Christine A. .
COGNITIVE SCIENCE, 2008, 32 (07) :1232-1244
[54]   Experience and sentence processing: Statistical learning and relative clause comprehension [J].
Wells, Justine B. ;
Christiansen, Morten H. ;
Race, David S. ;
Acheson, Daniel J. ;
MacDonald, Maryellen C. .
COGNITIVE PSYCHOLOGY, 2009, 58 (02) :250-271
[55]   Acquiring and processing verb argument structure: Distributional learning in a miniature language [J].
Wonnacott, Elizabeth ;
Newport, Elissa L. ;
Tanenhaus, Michael K. .
COGNITIVE PSYCHOLOGY, 2008, 56 (03) :165-209
[56]   Adjusting Conceptual Pacts in Three-Party Conversation [J].
Yoon, Si On ;
Brown-Schmidt, Sarah .
JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY-LEARNING MEMORY AND COGNITION, 2014, 40 (04) :919-937
[57]   The role of partial knowledge in statistical word learning [J].
Yurovsky, Daniel ;
Fricker, Damian C. ;
Yu, Chen ;
Smith, Linda B. .
PSYCHONOMIC BULLETIN & REVIEW, 2014, 21 (01) :1-22