Does greater diversification increase individual productivity? The moderating effect of attention allocation

被引:18
作者
Belkhouja, Mustapha [1 ]
Fattoum, Senda [2 ]
Yoon, Hyungseok [3 ]
机构
[1] Grenoble Ecole Management, F-38000 Grenoble, France
[2] Univ Montpellier, Montpellier Res Management, Montpellier Business Sch Univ, F-34185 Montpellier, France
[3] Univ Leeds, Leeds Univ Business Sch, Leeds LS2 9JT, W Yorkshire, England
关键词
Attention; Cognition; Collaboration; Diversification; Research productivity; RESEARCH ASSESSMENT EXERCISES; RESEARCH COLLABORATION; TEAM DIVERSITY; SCIENTIFIC COLLABORATION; KNOWLEDGE CREATION; NETWORK STRUCTURE; RESEARCH QUALITY; EXTERNAL SEARCH; RISK-TAKING; IMPACT;
D O I
10.1016/j.respol.2021.104256
中图分类号
C93 [管理学];
学科分类号
12 ; 1201 ; 1202 ; 120202 ;
摘要
Despite the consensus on the ?double-edged sword? effect of diversification (of knowledge and collaborators) on individual performance, little is known about the contingencies that affect the relationship between diversification and individual productivity. Drawing on the attention-based view, we theorize the moderating role of attention allocation to advance our understanding of the curvilinear relationship between diversification (of knowledge and collaborators) and individual productivity. Relevant hypotheses are tested using a longitudinal sample of more than 25,000 individual scholars. Our analysis reveals that although a moderate level of knowledge diversification is optimal for research productivity when the level of cognitive attention is low, a high level of knowledge diversification is more beneficial for research productivity when the level of cognitive attention is high. Furthermore, we show that a moderate level of collaborator diversification, coupled with a high level of collaborative attention, is optimal for research productivity. Our study provides important implications for highly skilled and creative individuals.
引用
收藏
页数:15
相关论文
共 112 条
[11]   Centrality and network flow [J].
Borgatti, SP .
SOCIAL NETWORKS, 2005, 27 (01) :55-71
[12]   A THEORY OF VISUAL-ATTENTION [J].
BUNDESEN, C .
PSYCHOLOGICAL REVIEW, 1990, 97 (04) :523-547
[13]  
BURT RS, 1992, NETWORKS AND ORGANIZATIONS : STRUCTURE, FORM, AND ACTION, P57
[14]   Structural holes and good ideas [J].
Burt, RS .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SOCIOLOGY, 2004, 110 (02) :349-399
[15]  
Bush V., 1945, Science the endless frontier: A report to the president
[16]  
Cameron A. C., 2013, Regression analysis of count data, DOI [10.1017/CBO9781139013567, DOI 10.1017/CBO9781139013567]
[17]   Breakthrough recognition: Bias against novelty and competition for attention [J].
Chai, Sen ;
Menon, Anoop .
RESEARCH POLICY, 2019, 48 (03) :733-747
[18]   Scholarly influence [J].
Chambers, Christopher P. ;
Miller, Alan D. .
JOURNAL OF ECONOMIC THEORY, 2014, 151 :571-583
[19]   Using users: When does external knowledge enhance corporate product innovation? [J].
Chatterji, Aaron K. ;
Fabrizio, Kira R. .
STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT JOURNAL, 2014, 35 (10) :1427-1445
[20]   International research collaboration: An emerging domain of innovation studies? [J].
Chen, Kaihua ;
Zhang, Yi ;
Fu, Xiaolan .
RESEARCH POLICY, 2019, 48 (01) :149-168