Does greater diversification increase individual productivity? The moderating effect of attention allocation

被引:18
作者
Belkhouja, Mustapha [1 ]
Fattoum, Senda [2 ]
Yoon, Hyungseok [3 ]
机构
[1] Grenoble Ecole Management, F-38000 Grenoble, France
[2] Univ Montpellier, Montpellier Res Management, Montpellier Business Sch Univ, F-34185 Montpellier, France
[3] Univ Leeds, Leeds Univ Business Sch, Leeds LS2 9JT, W Yorkshire, England
关键词
Attention; Cognition; Collaboration; Diversification; Research productivity; RESEARCH ASSESSMENT EXERCISES; RESEARCH COLLABORATION; TEAM DIVERSITY; SCIENTIFIC COLLABORATION; KNOWLEDGE CREATION; NETWORK STRUCTURE; RESEARCH QUALITY; EXTERNAL SEARCH; RISK-TAKING; IMPACT;
D O I
10.1016/j.respol.2021.104256
中图分类号
C93 [管理学];
学科分类号
12 ; 1201 ; 1202 ; 120202 ;
摘要
Despite the consensus on the ?double-edged sword? effect of diversification (of knowledge and collaborators) on individual performance, little is known about the contingencies that affect the relationship between diversification and individual productivity. Drawing on the attention-based view, we theorize the moderating role of attention allocation to advance our understanding of the curvilinear relationship between diversification (of knowledge and collaborators) and individual productivity. Relevant hypotheses are tested using a longitudinal sample of more than 25,000 individual scholars. Our analysis reveals that although a moderate level of knowledge diversification is optimal for research productivity when the level of cognitive attention is low, a high level of knowledge diversification is more beneficial for research productivity when the level of cognitive attention is high. Furthermore, we show that a moderate level of collaborator diversification, coupled with a high level of collaborative attention, is optimal for research productivity. Our study provides important implications for highly skilled and creative individuals.
引用
收藏
页数:15
相关论文
共 112 条
[1]   How stars matter: Recruiting and peer effects in evolutionary biology [J].
Agrawal, Ajay ;
McHale, John ;
Oettl, Alexander .
RESEARCH POLICY, 2017, 46 (04) :853-867
[2]  
Amabile T. M., 1996, Creativity in context, V5
[3]   Entrepreneurs, Jacks of all trades or Hobos? [J].
Astebro, Thomas ;
Thompson, Peter .
RESEARCH POLICY, 2011, 40 (05) :637-649
[4]   STUDIES IN SCIENTIFIC COLLABORATION .3. PROFESSIONALIZATION AND THE NATURAL-HISTORY OF MODERN SCIENTIFIC CO-AUTHORSHIP [J].
BEAVER, DD ;
ROSEN, R .
SCIENTOMETRICS, 1979, 1 (03) :231-245
[5]   How does openness influence the impact of a scholar's research? An analysis of business scholars' citations over their careers [J].
Belkhouja, Mustapha ;
Yoon, Hyungseok .
RESEARCH POLICY, 2018, 47 (10) :2037-2047
[6]   The mechanisms of collaboration in inventive teams: Composition, social networks, and geography [J].
Bercovitz, Janet ;
Feldman, Maryann .
RESEARCH POLICY, 2011, 40 (01) :81-93
[7]   The distribution of partnership returns: Evidence from co-authorships in economics journals [J].
Bidault, Francis ;
Hildebrand, Thomas .
RESEARCH POLICY, 2014, 43 (06) :1002-1013
[8]   The "human side" of open innovation: The role of employee diversity in firm-level openness [J].
Bogers, Marcel ;
Foss, Nicolai J. ;
Lyngsie, Jacob .
RESEARCH POLICY, 2018, 47 (01) :218-231
[9]  
Bonacich P., 1972, SOCIOL METHODOL, V4, P176, DOI DOI 10.2307/270732
[10]  
Borgatti S., 1995, CONNECTIONS, V18, P112