An indicator framework for assessing progress in land and marine planning in Colombia and Cuba

被引:18
作者
Botero, C. M. [1 ]
Fanning, L. M. [2 ]
Milanes, C. [3 ]
Planas, J. A. [4 ]
机构
[1] Univ Sergio Arboleda, Joaquin Aaron Manjarres Res Grp, Calle 18 14A-18, Santa Marta, Colombia
[2] Dalhousie Univ, Marine Affairs Program, POB 15000, Halifax, NS, Canada
[3] Univ Oriente, Multidisciplinary Study Ctr Coastal Zones CEMZOC, Las Amer Ave S-N, Santiago De Cuba 90500, Cuba
[4] Minist Sci Technol & Environm, Res Ctr Solar Energy, Micro 3, Santiago De Cuba, Cuba
关键词
Integrated coastal management (ICM); River basin management (RBM); Marine spatial planning (MSP); Land use planning (LUP); Planning instruments; Indicators; Effectiveness of ICM; Cuba; Colombia; COASTAL ZONE MANAGEMENT; ICZM; SEA; PARTICIPATION;
D O I
10.1016/j.ecolind.2015.12.038
中图分类号
X176 [生物多样性保护];
学科分类号
090705 ;
摘要
Achievement of environmental management goals and objectives in coastal areas, including how to measure success, remains a significant subject for discussion among scholars and practitioners, meanwhile four distinct management efforts potentially converge within the coastal zone: land-use planning (LUP), river basin management (RBM), marine spatial planning (MSP) and integrated coastal management (ICM). This paper examines the general lack of attention being paid to overlapping spatial boundaries within the landward and marine areas and proposes an indicator-based framework to measure the effectiveness of the individual planning instruments, as opposed to specific initiatives, in achieving management goals. The six indicators used in the framework (planning; participation; communication; integration; responsibility and balance) are based on a modified version of the Coastal Sustainability Standard methodology described by Gallagher (2010). The framework provides for four scenarios of progress in three geographical dimensions (river, municipality and marine area) to be assessed. For this study, the Caribbean coast of Colombia and Cuba were identified as the areas to test the feasibility and relevance of the indicator framework to monitor progress in the different management approaches established to achieve coastal sustainability. Several key observations and-lessons from the indicator-based framework are discussed in order to analyze the overlapping of the four space-based instruments, identify areas for targeted intervention and improve their integration. (C) 2016 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:181 / 193
页数:13
相关论文
共 49 条
[1]  
Agardy T., 2010, Ocean zoning-Making marine management more effective
[2]   Formulating a coastal zone health metric for landuse impact management in urban coastal zones [J].
Anilkumar, P. P. ;
Varghese, Koshy ;
Ganesh, L. S. .
JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT, 2010, 91 (11) :2172-2185
[3]  
[Anonymous], 1996, GES REP STUD
[4]  
[Anonymous], 1993, World Coast Conference, Noordwijk, The Netherlands, 1-5 November, 1993
[5]  
[Anonymous], MANEJO COSTERO INTEG
[6]   A methodological approach to evaluate progress and public participation in ICZM: The case of the Cantabria Region, Spain [J].
Areizaga, J. ;
Sano, M. ;
Medina, R. ;
Juanes, J. .
OCEAN & COASTAL MANAGEMENT, 2012, 59 :63-76
[7]  
Avella F., 2009, MANEJO COSTERO INTEG, P175
[8]  
Barragan J.M., 2003, Medio ambiente y desarrollo en las areas litorales
[9]   A dual-level framework for evaluating integrated coastal management beyond labels [J].
Bille, Raphael .
OCEAN & COASTAL MANAGEMENT, 2007, 50 (10) :796-807
[10]  
Botero C., 2013, THESIS U CADIZ PUERT