Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging Should Be Preferred Over Digital Rectal Examination for Prostate Cancer Local Staging and Disease Risk Classification

被引:27
|
作者
Soeterik, Timo F. W.
van Melick, Harm H. E.
Dijksman, Lea M.
Biesma, Douwe H.
Witjes, J. Alfred
van Basten, Jean-Paul A.
机构
[1] St Antonius Hosp, Dept Value Based Healthcare, Nieuwegein, Netherlands
[2] St Antonius Hosp, Dept Urol, Nieuwegein, Netherlands
[3] Radboud Univ Nijmegen, Dept Urol, Med Ctr, Nijmegen, Netherlands
[4] Canisius Wilhelmina Hosp, Dept Urol, Nijmegen, Netherlands
关键词
EXTRAPROSTATIC EXTENSION; RADICAL PROSTATECTOMY; SURVIVAL; ACCURACY; BIOPSY; MRI;
D O I
10.1016/j.urology.2020.08.089
中图分类号
R5 [内科学]; R69 [泌尿科学(泌尿生殖系疾病)];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
OBJECTIVE To assess the impact of multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (mp-MRI) local tumor staging on prostate cancer risk stratification and choice of treatment. MATERIALS AND METHODS Prostate cancer patients, newly diagnosed from 2017 to 2018 at 7 Dutch teaching hospitals were included. Risk group classification was done twice, using either digital rectal examination (DRE) or mp-MRI information. Risk group migration and rates of treatment intensification associated with mp-MRI upstaging were established. Diagnostic accuracy measures for the detection of nonorgan-confined disease (stage >= T3a), for both DRE and mp-MRI, were assessed in patients undergoing robot-assisted radical prostatectomy. RESULTS A total of 1683 patients were included. Upstaging due to mp-MRI staging occurred in 493 of 1683 (29%) patients and downstaging in 43 of 1683 (3%) patients. Upstaging was associated with significant higher odds for treatment intensification (odds ratio [OR]: 3.5 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.9-6.5). Stage >= T3a on mp-MRI was the most common reason for risk group upstaging (77%). Sensitivity for the detection of stage >= T3a was higher for mp-MRI compared to DRE (51% vs 12%, P <.001), whereas specificity was lower (82% vs 97%, P <.001). Mp-MRI resulted in a significantly higher cumulative rate of true positive and true negative stage >= T3a predictions compared with DRE (67% vs 58%, P <.001). CONCLUSION Use of mp-MRI tumor stage for prostate cancer risk classification leads to upstaging in 1 of 3 patients. Mp-MRI enables superior detection of nonorgan-confined disease compared with DRE, and should be the preferred tool for determining clinical tumor stage. (C) 2020 Elsevier Inc.
引用
收藏
页码:205 / 210
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Staging of Prostate Cancer: Role of Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Different Risk Classes
    Guerra, Francesco Saverio
    Eusebi, Laura
    Bartelli, Francesco
    Cecchini, Sara
    Paci, Enrico
    Guglielmi, Giuseppe
    UROLOGY RESEARCH AND PRACTICE, 2023, 49 (04) : 216 - 224
  • [2] Prostate Cancer Local Staging with Magnetic Resonance Imaging
    Lin, Yue
    Johnson, Latrice A.
    Fennessy, Fiona M.
    Turkbey, Baris
    RADIOLOGIC CLINICS OF NORTH AMERICA, 2024, 62 (01) : 93 - 108
  • [3] Overview of current multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging approach in the diagnosis and staging of prostate cancer
    Aydin, Hasan
    Kizilgoz, Volkan
    Tekin, Berna Okudan
    KAOHSIUNG JOURNAL OF MEDICAL SCIENCES, 2015, 31 (04) : 167 - 178
  • [4] ROLE OF MULTIPARAMETRIC MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING IN PROSTATE CANCER ASSESSMENT
    Tomaskovic, Igor
    Knezevic, Matej
    Pezelj, Ivan
    Culo, Karolina Bolanca
    Novosel, Luka
    Nikles, Sven
    Tomic, Miroslav
    Justinic, Danijel
    Nincevic, Josip
    Pirsa, Matea
    Ruzic, Boris
    ACTA CLINICA CROATICA, 2018, 57 : 35 - 39
  • [5] Prospective analysis of the diagnostic accuracy of digital rectal examination and magnetic resonance imaging for T staging of prostate cancer
    Zhu, Junming
    Wu, Xiaohui
    Xue, Yuting
    Li, Xiaodong
    Zheng, Qingshui
    Xue, Xueyi
    Huang, Zhiyang
    Chen, Shaohao
    JOURNAL OF CANCER RESEARCH AND THERAPEUTICS, 2023, 19 (04) : 1024 - 1030
  • [6] MULTIPARAMETRIC MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING IN PROSTATE CANCER DETECTION
    Garcia-Cruz, Eduardo
    Ramon-Barcelo, Catalina
    Carrion-Puig, Ramon
    Alcaraz, Antonio
    ARCHIVOS ESPANOLES DE UROLOGIA, 2019, 72 (04): : 374 - 380
  • [7] Clinical Impact and Statistical Significance of Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging for Local Staging of Prostate Cancer
    Huebner, Nicolai A.
    Shariat, Shahrokh F.
    EUROPEAN UROLOGY, 2021, 79 (02) : 186 - 187
  • [8] Multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging for pre-treatment local staging of prostate cancer: A Cancer Care Ontario clinical practice guideline
    Salerno, Jennifer
    Finelli, Antonio
    Morash, Chris
    Morgan, Scott C.
    Power, Nicholas
    Schieda, Nichola
    Haider, Masoom A.
    CUAJ-CANADIAN UROLOGICAL ASSOCIATION JOURNAL, 2016, 10 (9-10): : E332 - E346
  • [9] Multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging and multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging-guided biopsy in the diagnostic pathway of prostate cancer
    Chaloupka, Michael
    Apfelbeck, Maria
    Pfitzinger, Paulo
    Bischoff, Robert
    Lellig, Ekaterina
    Rath, Lukas
    Schlenker, Boris
    Stief, Christian G.
    Clevert, Dirk-Andre
    RADIOLOGE, 2020, 60 (Suppl 1): : 63 - 69
  • [10] Impact of Magnetic Resonance Imaging on Prostate Cancer Staging and European Association of Urology Risk Classification
    Draulans, Cedric
    Everaerts, Wouter
    Isebaert, Sofie
    Gevaert, Thomas
    Oyen, Raymond
    Joniau, Steven
    Lerut, Evelyne
    De Weyer, Liesbeth
    Weynand, Birgit
    Vanhoutte, Els
    De Meerleer, Gert
    Haustermans, Karin
    UROLOGY, 2019, 130 : 113 - 119