Following the attacks in Timbuktu in 2012, the ICC's Al Mahdi case became the first instance where one perpetrator was solely charged with the war crime of destruction of cultural heritage. The ICC prioritized the crimes against cultural heritage at the expense of other types of atrocities in Northern Mali for two reasons: expediency, and the convergence of interests between the Court, the Malian state, and the international community. This study finds that the international community, the state, and the local community do not have the same conceptions and approaches regarding cultural heritage, its protection, or its value.
机构:
Centre for International Studies and Diplomacy, SOAS University of London, LondonCentre for International Studies and Diplomacy, SOAS University of London, London
Plesch D.
Sácouto S.
论文数: 0引用数: 0
h-index: 0
机构:
The War Crimes Research Office, The American University Washington College of Law (WCL), WA, DCCentre for International Studies and Diplomacy, SOAS University of London, London
Sácouto S.
Lasco C.
论文数: 0引用数: 0
h-index: 0
机构:
The War Crimes Research Office, The American University Washington College of Law (WCL), WA, DCCentre for International Studies and Diplomacy, SOAS University of London, London
机构:
Washington & Lee Univ, Williams Sch Commerce Econ & Polit, Dept Econ, 204 W Washington St, Lexington, VA 24450 USAWashington & Lee Univ, Williams Sch Commerce Econ & Polit, Dept Econ, 204 W Washington St, Lexington, VA 24450 USA