A Community's Awareness and Perceptions of Genomic Medicine

被引:21
作者
Hahn, S. [1 ]
Letvak, S. [2 ]
Powell, K. [3 ]
Christianson, C. [3 ]
Wallace, D. [2 ]
Speer, M. [5 ]
Lietz, P. [4 ]
Blanton, S. [1 ]
Vance, J. [1 ]
Pericak-Vance, M. [1 ]
Henrich, V. C. [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Miami, Miami Inst Human Genom, Miller Sch Med, Miami, FL 33101 USA
[2] Univ N Carolina, Sch Nursing, Greensboro, NC 27412 USA
[3] Univ N Carolina, Ctr Biotechnol Genom & Hlth Res, Greensboro, NC 27412 USA
[4] Moses Cone Hlth Syst, Greensboro, NC USA
[5] Duke Univ, Ctr Human Genet, Durham, NC USA
关键词
Attitudes; Awareness; Focus group; Health education; Health knowledge; Public health; DECISION-MAKING; KNOWLEDGE; ATTITUDES; GENETICS; FAMILY; HEALTH; MAMMOGRAPHY; INFORMATION; BEHAVIOR; HISTORY;
D O I
10.1159/000218712
中图分类号
Q3 [遗传学];
学科分类号
071007 ; 090102 ;
摘要
Background: Focus groups were conducted in a mid-sized community to explore community members' awareness and perceptions of genomic medicine and identify effective methods to educate the public about this topic. Methods: Thirteen focus groups were conducted with a demographically representative pool of 121 participants using a semi-structured interview guide. Transcripts were analyzed through a computer assisted approach with Atlas TI consisting of coding, categorizing, comparing, and contrasting relevant data. Results: Identified categories were organized into 6 main themes, which were similar across the groups and included: a lack of awareness, perceived benefits, concerns about genomic medicine, reasons for poor health related behavior, the potential impact of genetic information on health behavior, and the best ways to educate the community. Common concerns included lack of affordability, unanticipated physical harm, mistrust of the government and researchers, downstream effects like overpopulation, playing God/disturbing the natural order, lack of regulations, loss of privacy, genetic discrimination, and moral dilemmas posed by genetic engineering, cloning, choosing traits, and abortions resulting from genetic information. Participants also discussed ways to educate the community. Conclusions: While individuals recognized that diseases run in families, personal experience was a driving factor in participants' level of knowledge. Many expressed optimism about genomic medicine. However, the lack of depth in responses and their misconceptions reflect a deficiency of knowledge, which along with their personal, moral, and global concerns could impede acceptance and utilization of genomic medicine. Many community members are receptive to learning more about genomic medicine, and many of their concerns and misconceptions can be addressed through a well designed education strategy. Copyright (C) 2009 S. Karger AG, Basel
引用
收藏
页码:63 / 71
页数:9
相关论文
共 32 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2000, FOCUS GROUPS PRACTIC
[2]   Physical activity in first-degree relatives of breast cancer patients [J].
Audrain, J ;
Schwartz, M ;
Herrera, J ;
Goldman, P ;
Bush, A .
JOURNAL OF BEHAVIORAL MEDICINE, 2001, 24 (06) :587-603
[3]   Effecting behavior change - Awareness of family history [J].
Audrain-McGovern, J ;
Hughes, C ;
Patterson, F .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PREVENTIVE MEDICINE, 2003, 24 (02) :183-189
[4]   What do you think about genetic medicine? - Facilitating sociable public discourse on developments in the new genetics [J].
Barns, I ;
Schibeci, R ;
Davison, A ;
Shaw, R .
SCIENCE TECHNOLOGY & HUMAN VALUES, 2000, 25 (03) :283-308
[5]   Public culture and public understanding of genetics: a focus group study [J].
Bates, BR .
PUBLIC UNDERSTANDING OF SCIENCE, 2005, 14 (01) :47-65
[6]   Warranted concerns, warranted outlooks: a focus group study of public understandings of genetic research [J].
Bates, BR ;
Lynch, JA ;
Bevan, JL ;
Condit, CA .
SOCIAL SCIENCE & MEDICINE, 2005, 60 (02) :331-344
[7]   Ready for genomic medicine? Perspectives of health care decision makers [J].
Billings, PR ;
Carlson, RJ ;
Carlson, J ;
Cain, M ;
Wilson, C ;
Shorett, P ;
Everett, W .
ARCHIVES OF INTERNAL MEDICINE, 2005, 165 (16) :1917-1919
[8]   Genetic test evaluation: Information needs of clinicians, policy makers, and the public [J].
Burke, W ;
Atkins, D ;
Gwinn, M ;
Guttmacher, A ;
Haddow, J ;
Lau, J ;
Palomaki, G ;
Press, N ;
Richards, CS ;
Wideroff, L ;
Wiesner, GL .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2002, 156 (04) :311-318
[9]   Attitudes about genetics in underserved, culturally diverse populations [J].
Catz, DS ;
Green, NS ;
Tobin, JN ;
Lloyd-Puryear, MA ;
Kyler, P ;
Umemoto, A ;
Cernoch, J ;
Browne, R ;
Wolman, F .
COMMUNITY GENETICS, 2005, 8 (03) :161-172
[10]   Decision-making in the physician-patient encounter: revisiting the shared treatment decision-making model [J].
Charles, C ;
Gafni, A ;
Whelan, T .
SOCIAL SCIENCE & MEDICINE, 1999, 49 (05) :651-661