共 6 条
Necessity to critically review the automatic results of the Xpert Flu assay
被引:5
作者:
Engelmann, Ilka
[1
]
Alidjinou, Enagnon Kazali
[1
]
Lazrek, Mouna
[1
]
Dewilde, Anny
[1
]
Hober, Didier
[1
]
机构:
[1] Univ Lille, Fac Med, CHU Lille, Lab Virol EA3610, F-59000 Lille, France
关键词:
Molecular diagnostic techniques;
Flu;
Influenza;
Point-of-care;
PCR;
Discordance;
INFLUENZA-A;
VIRUSES;
IDENTIFICATION;
D O I:
10.1016/j.diagmicrobio.2017.01.015
中图分类号:
R51 [传染病];
学科分类号:
100401 ;
摘要:
While using the Xpert Flu assay we became aware of false-negative results. The study aimed to analyze the causes of these false-negative results. One hundred fifty-nine respiratory specimens were tested in the Xpert Flu assay and in multiplex reverse transcription-polymerase chain reactions (RT-PCRs) for respiratory viruses. Discordant specimens were tested in the Influenza A/B r-gene assay. One hundred fifty-two (96%) and 151 (95%) specimens yielded concordant results for influenza A and B, respectively. Fifteen specimens tested negative in the Xpert Flu assay and positive in a multiplex RT-PCR. Positive results were confirmed for 12 of these specimens in the Influenza A/B r-gene assay. Xpert Flu assay amplification curves and endpoints suggested that the false negative results were mainly due to erroneous automatic result interpretation. We report false-negative results of the Xpert Flu assay due to erroneous automatic result interpretation. Careful analysis of amplification curves and endpoints is needed to avoid reporting of false-negative results. (C) 2017 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:26 / 30
页数:5
相关论文