Feasibility and efficacy of left bundle branch area pacing in patients indicated for cardiac resynchronization therapy

被引:22
|
作者
Li, Yuqiu [1 ]
Yan, Lirong [1 ]
Dai, Yan [1 ]
Zhou, Yu'an [1 ]
Sun, Qi [1 ]
Chen, Ruohan [1 ]
Lin, Jinxuan [1 ]
Jin, Yuanhao [1 ]
Chen, Feng [1 ]
Guo, Xiaogang [1 ]
Chen, Keping [1 ]
Zhang, Shu [1 ]
机构
[1] Chinese Acad Med Sci & Peking Union Med Coll, Fuwai Hosp, State Key Lab Cardiovasc Dis, Natl Ctr Cardiovasc Dis,Arrhythmia Ctr, Beijing 100037, Peoples R China
来源
EUROPACE | 2020年 / 22卷
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Left bundle branch area pacing; Cardiac resynchronization therapy; Heart failure; Right ventricular pacing-induced cardiomyopathy; Bundle branch block; ESC GUIDELINES;
D O I
10.1093/europace/euaa271
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Aims The present study was to evaluate the feasibility and clinical outcomes of left bundle branch area pacing (LBBAP) in cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT)-indicated patients. Methods and results LBBAP was performed via transventricular septal approach in 25 patients as a rescue strategy in 5 patients with failed left ventricular (LV) lead placement and as a primary strategy in the remaining 20 patients. Pacing parameters, procedural characteristics, electrocardiographic, and echocardiographic data were assessed at implantation and follow-up. Of 25 enrolled CRT-indicated patients, 14 had left bundle branch block (LBBB, 56.0%), 3 right bundle branch block (RBBB, 12.0%), 4 intraventricular conduction delay (IVCD, 16.0%), and 4 ventricular pacing dependence (16.0%). The QRS duration (QRSd) was significantly shortened by LBBAP (intrinsic 163.6 +/- 29.4 ms vs. LBBAP 123.0 +/- 10.8 ms, P < 0.001). During the mean follow-up of 9.1 months, New York Heart Association functional class was improved to 1.4 +/- 0.6 from baseline 2.6 +/- 0.6 (P < 0.001), left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) increased to 46.9 +/- 10.2% from baseline 35.2 +/- 7.0% (P < 0.001), and LV end-diastolic dimensions (LVEDD) decreased to 56.8 +/- 9.7mm from baseline 64.1 +/- 9.9mm (P < 0.001). There was a significant improvement (34.1 +/- 7.4% vs. 50.0 +/- 12.2%, P < 0.001) in LVEF in patients with LBBB. Conclusion The present study demonstrates the clinical feasibility of LBBAP in CRT-indicated patients. Left bundle branch area pacing generated narrow QRSd and led to reversal remodelling of LV with improvement in cardiac function. LBBAP may be an alternative to CRT in patients with failure of LV lead placement and a first-line option in selected patients such as those with LBBB and heart failure.
引用
收藏
页码:54 / 60
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Feasibility and safety of left bundle branch area pacing in cardiac amyloidosis. A single center experience
    Pham-Trung, Chinh
    Veloza-Urrea, Darwin
    Segura-Dominguez, Melodie
    Rojas, Yuleisy De la Rosa
    Aguilera-Agudo, Cristina
    Garcia-Izquierdo, Eusebio Alejandro
    Garcia-Rodriguez, Daniel
    Jimenez-Sanchez, Diego
    Lorente-Ros, Alvaro
    Mingo-Santos, Susana
    Gonzalez-Lopez, Esther
    Dominguez, Fernando
    Garcia-Pavia, Pablo
    Toquero-Ramos, Jorge
    Fernandez-Lozano, Ignacio
    Castro-Urda, Victor
    PACE-PACING AND CLINICAL ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY, 2024, 47 (01): : 149 - 155
  • [42] Left bundle branch pacing cardiac resynchronization therapy vs biventricular pacing cardiac resynchronization therapy-time to write a requiem for biventricular pacing-cardiac resynchronization therapy
    Pradhan, Akshyaya
    Saggu, Daljeet
    Bhandari, Monika
    WORLD JOURNAL OF CARDIOLOGY, 2025, 17 (02):
  • [43] Does Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy Benefit Patients With Right Bundle Branch Block Left Ventricular Free Wall Pacing: Seldom Right for Right Bundle Branch Block
    Bilchick, Kenneth C.
    CIRCULATION-ARRHYTHMIA AND ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY, 2014, 7 (03) : 543 - 552
  • [44] Left bundle branch area pacing vs biventricular pacing for cardiac resynchronization: A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Yousaf, Amman
    Ahmad, Soban
    Peltz, Joshua
    Ahsan, Muhammad Junaid
    Abbas, Kirellos Said
    Muhammad, Shoaib
    Watson, Christopher
    Asad, Zain Ul Abideen
    Kim, Michael H.
    HEART RHYTHM, 2023, 4 (11) : 671 - 680
  • [45] Cardiac resynchronization therapy with His bundle pacing
    Boczar, Krzysztof
    Slawuta, Agnieszka
    Zabek, Andrzej
    Debski, Maciej
    Vijayaraman, Pugazhendhi
    Gajek, Jacek
    Lelakowski, Jacek
    Malecka, Barbara
    PACE-PACING AND CLINICAL ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY, 2019, 42 (03): : 374 - 380
  • [46] Reverse electrical remodelling after cardiac resynchronization therapy in a patient undergoing left bundle branch area pacing: a case report
    Rijks, Jesse H. J.
    Luermans, Justin
    Vernooy, Kevin
    EUROPEAN HEART JOURNAL-CASE REPORTS, 2024, 8 (12)
  • [47] Left Bundle Branch Pacing for Cardiac Resynchronization Are We Ready for a Leap of Faith?
    Vijayaraman, Pugazhendhi
    Batul, Syeda Atiqa
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY, 2022, 80 (13) : 1217 - 1219
  • [48] Does Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy Benefit Patients With Right Bundle Branch Block Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy Has a Role in Patients With Right Bundle Branch Block
    Auricchio, Angelo
    Lumens, Joost
    Prinzen, Frits W.
    CIRCULATION-ARRHYTHMIA AND ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY, 2014, 7 (03) : 532 - 542
  • [49] Dual-chamber ICD for left bundle branch area pacing: the cardiac resynchronization and arrhythmia sensing via the left bundle (cross-left) pilot study
    Clementy, Nicolas
    Bodin, Alexandre
    Ah-Fat, Vincent
    Babuty, Dominique
    Bisson, Arnaud
    JOURNAL OF INTERVENTIONAL CARDIAC ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY, 2023, 66 (04) : 905 - 912
  • [50] Dual-chamber ICD for left bundle branch area pacing: the cardiac resynchronization and arrhythmia sensing via the left bundle (cross-left) pilot study
    Nicolas Clementy
    Alexandre Bodin
    Vincent Ah-Fat
    Dominique Babuty
    Arnaud Bisson
    Journal of Interventional Cardiac Electrophysiology, 2023, 66 : 905 - 912