Feasibility and efficacy of left bundle branch area pacing in patients indicated for cardiac resynchronization therapy

被引:22
|
作者
Li, Yuqiu [1 ]
Yan, Lirong [1 ]
Dai, Yan [1 ]
Zhou, Yu'an [1 ]
Sun, Qi [1 ]
Chen, Ruohan [1 ]
Lin, Jinxuan [1 ]
Jin, Yuanhao [1 ]
Chen, Feng [1 ]
Guo, Xiaogang [1 ]
Chen, Keping [1 ]
Zhang, Shu [1 ]
机构
[1] Chinese Acad Med Sci & Peking Union Med Coll, Fuwai Hosp, State Key Lab Cardiovasc Dis, Natl Ctr Cardiovasc Dis,Arrhythmia Ctr, Beijing 100037, Peoples R China
来源
EUROPACE | 2020年 / 22卷
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Left bundle branch area pacing; Cardiac resynchronization therapy; Heart failure; Right ventricular pacing-induced cardiomyopathy; Bundle branch block; ESC GUIDELINES;
D O I
10.1093/europace/euaa271
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Aims The present study was to evaluate the feasibility and clinical outcomes of left bundle branch area pacing (LBBAP) in cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT)-indicated patients. Methods and results LBBAP was performed via transventricular septal approach in 25 patients as a rescue strategy in 5 patients with failed left ventricular (LV) lead placement and as a primary strategy in the remaining 20 patients. Pacing parameters, procedural characteristics, electrocardiographic, and echocardiographic data were assessed at implantation and follow-up. Of 25 enrolled CRT-indicated patients, 14 had left bundle branch block (LBBB, 56.0%), 3 right bundle branch block (RBBB, 12.0%), 4 intraventricular conduction delay (IVCD, 16.0%), and 4 ventricular pacing dependence (16.0%). The QRS duration (QRSd) was significantly shortened by LBBAP (intrinsic 163.6 +/- 29.4 ms vs. LBBAP 123.0 +/- 10.8 ms, P < 0.001). During the mean follow-up of 9.1 months, New York Heart Association functional class was improved to 1.4 +/- 0.6 from baseline 2.6 +/- 0.6 (P < 0.001), left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) increased to 46.9 +/- 10.2% from baseline 35.2 +/- 7.0% (P < 0.001), and LV end-diastolic dimensions (LVEDD) decreased to 56.8 +/- 9.7mm from baseline 64.1 +/- 9.9mm (P < 0.001). There was a significant improvement (34.1 +/- 7.4% vs. 50.0 +/- 12.2%, P < 0.001) in LVEF in patients with LBBB. Conclusion The present study demonstrates the clinical feasibility of LBBAP in CRT-indicated patients. Left bundle branch area pacing generated narrow QRSd and led to reversal remodelling of LV with improvement in cardiac function. LBBAP may be an alternative to CRT in patients with failure of LV lead placement and a first-line option in selected patients such as those with LBBB and heart failure.
引用
收藏
页码:54 / 60
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Using artificial intelligence-enabled electrocardiogram to predict cardiac resynchronization therapy outcomes of left bundle branch area pacing
    Chen, Jingjing
    Ezzeddine, Fatima M.
    Liu, Xiaoke
    Munoz, Freddy Del-Carpio
    Friedman, Paul
    Cha, Yong-Mei
    EUROPACE, 2023, 26 (01):
  • [32] Left Bundle Branch Pacing Optimized Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy A Novel Approach
    Vijayaraman, Pugazhendhi
    JACC-CLINICAL ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY, 2021, 7 (08) : 1076 - 1078
  • [33] Cardiac resynchronization therapy via left bundle branch pacing in heart failure with complete left bundle branch block: is the defibrillator needed?
    Yang, Dandan
    Ma, Qunchao
    Zhu, Hong
    Wang, Lihua
    Xiang, Meixiang
    Wang, Jian'an
    Pan, Xiaohong
    FRONTIERS IN CARDIOVASCULAR MEDICINE, 2025, 12
  • [34] Left bundle branch area pacing for heart failure patients requiring cardiac resynchronization therapy: A meta-analysis
    Jin, Chengyue
    Dai, Qiying
    Li, Pengyang
    Lam, Patrick
    Cha, Yong-Mei
    JOURNAL OF CARDIOVASCULAR ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY, 2023, 34 (09) : 1933 - 1943
  • [35] Improved all-cause mortality with left bundle branch area pacing compared to biventricular pacing in cardiac resynchronization therapy: a meta-analysis
    Diaz, Juan Carlos
    Gabr, Mohamed
    Tedrow, Usha B.
    Duque, Mauricio
    Aristizabal, Julian
    Marin, Jorge
    Nino, Cesar
    Bastidas, Oriana
    Koplan, Bruce A.
    Hoyos, Carolina
    Matos, Carlos D.
    Hincapie, Daniela
    Pacheco-Barrios, Kevin
    Alviz, Isabella
    Steiger, Nathaniel A.
    Kapur, Sunil
    Tadros, Thomas M.
    Zei, Paul C.
    Sauer, William H.
    Romero, Jorge E.
    JOURNAL OF INTERVENTIONAL CARDIAC ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY, 2024, 67 (6) : 1463 - 1476
  • [36] Cardiac resynchronization considerations in left bundle branch block
    Kong, Nathan W.
    Upadhyay, Gaurav A.
    FRONTIERS IN PHYSIOLOGY, 2022, 13
  • [37] Left Ventricular Septal Versus Left Bundle Branch Pacing A New Beginning in Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy?
    Vijayaraman, Pugazhendhi
    Nayak, Hemal M.
    Ellenbogen, Kenneth A.
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY, 2020, 75 (04) : 360 - 362
  • [38] Left Bundle Branch Pacing Versus Biventricular Pacing for Acute Cardiac Resynchronization in Patients With Heart Failure
    Liang, Yixiu
    Wang, Jingfeng
    Gong, Xue
    Lu, Hongyang
    Yu, Ziqing
    Zhang, Lei
    Li, Minghui
    Pan, Lei
    Chen, Xueying
    Cui, Jie
    Zhang, Weiwei
    Li, Ruogu
    Zhou, Xiaohong
    Huang, Weijian
    Su, Yangang
    Ge, Junbo
    CIRCULATION-ARRHYTHMIA AND ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY, 2022, 15 (11) : 751 - 761
  • [39] The Emerging Role of Left Bundle Branch Area Pacing for Cardiac Resynchronisation Therapy
    Diaz, Juan Carlos
    Duque, Mauricio
    Aristizabal, Julian
    Marin, Jorge
    Nino, Cesar
    Bastidas, Oriana
    Ruiz, Luis Miguel
    Matos, Carlos
    Hoyos, Carolina
    Hincapie, Daniela
    Velasco, Alejandro
    Romero, Jorge E.
    ARRHYTHMIA & ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY REVIEW, 2023, 12
  • [40] Left ventricular performance during triggered left ventricular pacing in patients with cardiac resynchronization therapy and left bundle branch block
    Witt, Christoffer Tobias
    Kronborg, Mads Brix
    Nohr, Ellen Aagaard
    Nielsen, Jens Cosedis
    JOURNAL OF INTERVENTIONAL CARDIAC ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY, 2016, 46 (03) : 345 - 351