F-18FDG PET/CT evaluation of osseous and soft tissue sarcomas

被引:43
作者
Iagaru, Andrei
Quon, Andrew
McDougall, T. Ross
Gambhir, Sanjiv S.
机构
[1] Stanford Hosp & Clin, Dept Radiol, Div Nucl Med, Stanford, CA USA
[2] Stanford Hosp & Clin, Dept Bioengn, Div Nucl Med, Stanford, CA USA
关键词
sarcoma; F-18FDG; PET/CT;
D O I
10.1097/01.rlu.0000246846.01492.31
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
Introduction: Osseous and soft tissue sarcomas (OSTS) represent a histologic heterogeneous group of malignant tumors. Most of the current clinical data on the role of F-18 FDG PET in sarcomas come from patients studied with dedicated PET and less frequently with hardware fusion PET/CT. Therefore, we were prompted to review our experience with F-18 FDG PET/CT in OSTS. Methods: This is a retrospective study (January 2003-December 2005) of 44 patients with histologic diagnoses of OSTS who had F-18 FDG PET/CT at our institution. The group included 22 men and 22 women with an age range of 2 of 84 years (average, 37 +/- 20.2 years). The administered doses of F-18 FDG range 4.1 to 19.5 mCi (average, 14.3 +/- 3 mCi). Reinterpretation of the imaging studies for accuracy and data analysis from medical records was performed. Results: The sensitivity and specificity of combined F-18 FDG PET/CT were 100% (95% confidence interval [Cl] = 75.7-100) and 93.3% (95% Cl = 78.7-98.1) for the primary OSTS, and 80% (95% CI = 58.4-91.9) and 86.4% (95% Cl = 66.7-95.2) for metastases. When interpreted separately, CT outperformed PET for pulmonary metastases detection: CT was 76.5% sensitive and 88% specific, whereas PET was only 57.1% sensitive but 96.4% specific. For detection of other metastases, CT was 82.3% sensitive and 76% specific, with PET demonstrating 78.6% sensitivity and 92.8% specificity. Conclusion: Relatively similar results (except better specificity for PET and PET/CT) were noted when examining the rate of metastases detection, excluding pulmonary lesions. However, CT had a better detection rate for pulmonary metastases when compared with PET alone. A negative PET scan in the presence of suspicious CT findings in the chest cannot reliably exclude pulmonary metastases from OSTS.
引用
收藏
页码:754 / 760
页数:7
相关论文
共 20 条
[1]   Accuracy of whole-body dual-modality fluorine-18-2-fluoro-2-deoxy-D-glucose positron emission tomography and computed tomography (FDG-PET/CT) for tumor staging in solid tumors: Comparison with CT and PET [J].
Antoch, G ;
Saoudi, N ;
Kuehl, H ;
Dahmen, G ;
Mueller, SP ;
Beyer, T ;
Bockisch, A ;
Debatin, JF ;
Freudenberg, LS .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2004, 22 (21) :4357-4368
[2]   The value of FDG-PET in the detection, grading and response to therapy of soft tissue and bone sarcomas; a systematic review and meta-analysis [J].
Bastiaannet, E ;
Groen, H ;
Jager, PL ;
Cobben, DCP ;
van der Graaf, WTA ;
Vaalburg, W ;
Hoekstra, HJ .
CANCER TREATMENT REVIEWS, 2004, 30 (01) :83-101
[3]   Value of FDG positron emission tomography in conjunction with MR imaging for evaluating therapy response in patients with musculoskeletal sarcomas [J].
Bredella, MA ;
Caputo, GR ;
Steinbach, LS .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 2002, 179 (05) :1145-1150
[4]  
Brenner W, 2003, J NUCL MED, V44, P930
[5]   Imaging of malignant tumours of the long bones in children: monitoring response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy and preoperative assessment [J].
Brisse, H ;
Ollivier, L ;
Edeline, V ;
Pacquement, H ;
Michon, J ;
Glorion, C ;
Neuenschwander, S .
PEDIATRIC RADIOLOGY, 2004, 34 (08) :595-605
[6]  
Conti P. S., 1996, Journal of Nuclear Medicine, V37, p140P
[7]  
Conti PS, 1999, RADIOLOGY, V213P, P118
[8]   FDG-PET for detection of pulmonary metastases from malignant primary bone tumors:: Comparison with spiral CT [J].
Franzius, C ;
Daldrup-Link, HE ;
Sciuk, J ;
Rummeny, EJ ;
Bielack, S ;
Jürgens, H ;
Schober, O .
ANNALS OF ONCOLOGY, 2001, 12 (04) :479-486
[9]   Molecular imaging of cancer with positron emission tomography [J].
Gambhir, SS .
NATURE REVIEWS CANCER, 2002, 2 (09) :683-693
[10]  
IAGARU A, IN PRESS NUCL MED CO