Synergy of systems theory and symbolic interactionism: a passageway for non-Indigenous researchers that facilitates better understanding Indigenous worldviews and knowledges

被引:26
作者
Ali, Tahir [1 ]
Buergelt, Petra T. [2 ]
Maypilama, Elaine Lawurrpa [3 ]
Paton, Douglas [4 ]
Smith, James A. [5 ]
Jehan, Noor [6 ]
机构
[1] Charles Darwin Univ, Coll Hlth & Human Sci, Darwin, NT, Australia
[2] Univ Canberra, Fac Hlth, Canberra, ACT, Australia
[3] Charles Darwin Univ, Coll Indigenous Futures Arts & Soc, Darwin, NT, Australia
[4] Univ Canberra, Canberra, ACT, Australia
[5] Menzies Sch Hlth Res, Wellbeing & Preventable Chron Condit, Darwin, NT, Australia
[6] Univ Peshawar, Ctr Disaster Preparedness & Management, Peshawar, Pakistan
关键词
Indigenous research; philosophical paradigms; system theory; symbolic interactionism; non-Indigenous researchers;
D O I
10.1080/13645579.2021.1876300
中图分类号
C [社会科学总论];
学科分类号
03 ; 0303 ;
摘要
Historically, non-Indigenous researchers have contributed to colonisation by research based on Western positivistic philosophical frameworks. This approach led to disembodying knowledge from Indigenous people's histories, worldviews, and cultural and social practices, thus perpetuating a deficit-based discourse which situates the responsibility of problems within Indigenous peoples and ignores the larger socio-economic and historical contexts in which problems are rooted. Rectifying this position requires decolonising Western positivistic research by shifting to basing research on social constructionist paradigms that lead to strength-based approaches. Based on our experiences gained exploring disaster risk reduction perspectives with two remote Indigenous communities in Australia and Pakistan, we suggest in this conceptual paper that a synergy of systems theory and symbolic interactionism offers an appropriate philosophical lens to non-Indigenous researchers for gaining a more comprehensive and deeper understanding of Indigenous holistic and relational perspectives, experiences, interpretations and actions/interaction. Research based on these philosophical worldviews promotes a strength-based approach that aligns with and empowers Indigenous ways of facilitating health and wellbeing. We offer our experiences of utilising these two frameworks and of how they could assist other non-Indigenous researchers to discover valuable insights into Indigenous perspectives and interpretations that might otherwise be ignored or neglected.
引用
收藏
页码:197 / 212
页数:16
相关论文
共 50 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2013, DECOLONIZATION
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2018, Ethical conduct in research with Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Peoples and communities: Guidelines for researchers and stakeholders
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2012, GUID ETH RES AUSTR I
[4]  
Barile S., 2010, Serv. Sci., V2, P21, DOI [DOI 10.1287/SERV.2.1_2.21, DOI 10.1287/SERV.2.12.21]
[5]   Ecological complexity, fuzzy logic, and holism in indigenous knowledge [J].
Berkes, Fikret ;
Berkes, Mina Kislalioglu .
FUTURES, 2009, 41 (01) :6-12
[6]  
Bertalanffy L., 1968, GEN SYSTEM THEORY
[7]  
Bessarab D., 2010, International Journal of Critical Indigenous Studies, V3, P37, DOI [DOI 10.5204/IJCIS.V3I1.57, 10.5204/ijcis.v3i1.57]
[8]  
Blumer Herbert., 1969, Symbolic interaction-perspective and method
[9]  
Bronfenbrenner W., 1979, The ecology of human development: Experiments by nature and design
[10]  
Buergelt P.T., 2017, DISASTER RESILIENCE, P289