Good corporate governance and corporate sustainability performance in Indonesia: A triple bottom line approach

被引:46
作者
Tjahjadi, Bambang [1 ]
Soewarno, Noorlailie [1 ]
Mustikaningtiyas, Febriani [1 ]
机构
[1] Airlangga Univ, Fac Econ & Business, Surabaya, Indonesia
关键词
Good corporate governance; Corporate sustainability performance; Triple bottom line; Agency theory; Sustainability theory; Upper echelon theory; SOCIAL-RESPONSIBILITY DISCLOSURE; FIRM FINANCIAL PERFORMANCE; BOARD-OF-DIRECTORS; CEO CHARACTERISTICS; ENVIRONMENTAL PERFORMANCE; GENDER DIVERSITY; UPPER ECHELONS; DETERMINANTS; EDUCATION; FAMILY;
D O I
10.1016/j.heliyon.2021.e06453
中图分类号
O [数理科学和化学]; P [天文学、地球科学]; Q [生物科学]; N [自然科学总论];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
This study aims to investigate the effect of good corporate governance (GCG) on corporate sustainability performance (CSP) using the Triple Bottom Line (TBL) approach in a two-tier GCG system. GCG is measured by the size and education background of board of commissioners (BoC) and top management team (TMT). CSP consists of economic, social, and environment sustainability performance. As many as 117 sample data were collected from the financial statements, annual reports and sustainability reports of non-financial companies listed on the Indonesia Stock Exchange (IDX) for the period of 2013-2017. Multiple regression analysis was employed to test the hypotheses studied with the following results. First, BoC education has a negative effect on economic and environmental sustainability performance and no effect on social sustainability performance. Second, BoC size has a positive effect on economic sustainability performance, a negative effect on social sustainability performance and no effect on environmental sustainability performance. Third, CEO's education has a negative effect on economic sustainability performance, and no effect on environmental and social sustainability performance. Fourth, TMT size has a negative effect on economic and environmental sustainability performance and no effect on social sustainability performance. Contributions, limitations and implications of the study are also discussed.
引用
收藏
页数:11
相关论文
共 116 条
  • [1] The Relation between Strategy, CEO Selection, and Firm Performance
    Abernethy, Margaret A.
    Kuang, Yu Flora
    Qin, Bo
    [J]. CONTEMPORARY ACCOUNTING RESEARCH, 2019, 36 (03) : 1575 - 1606
  • [2] Board Diversity: Moving the Field Forward
    Adams, Renee B.
    de Haan, Jakob
    Terjesen, Siri
    van Ees, Hans
    [J]. CORPORATE GOVERNANCE-AN INTERNATIONAL REVIEW, 2015, 23 (02) : 77 - 82
  • [3] Board diversity and firm performance: The role of business group affiliation
    Aggarwal, Raj
    Jindal, Varun
    Seth, Rama
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL BUSINESS REVIEW, 2019, 28 (06)
  • [4] Formal and real authority in organizations
    Aghion, P
    Tirole, J
    [J]. JOURNAL OF POLITICAL ECONOMY, 1997, 105 (01) : 1 - 29
  • [5] Industrial characteristics and air emissions: Long-term determinants in the UK manufacturing sector
    Agnolucci, Paolo
    Arvanitopoulos, Theodoros
    [J]. ENERGY ECONOMICS, 2019, 78 : 546 - 566
  • [6] Does corporate R&D investment affect firm environmental performance? Evidence from G-6 countries
    Alam, Md. Samsul
    Atif, Muhammad
    Chien-Chi, Chu
    Soytas, Ugur
    [J]. ENERGY ECONOMICS, 2019, 78 : 401 - 411
  • [7] ANDEZ MCD, 2020, EUR MANAG J, V38, P157
  • [8] Does Self-Certification Encourage or Reduce Opportunistic Behavior?
    Ang, Nicole
    Cheng, Mandy M.
    [J]. BEHAVIORAL RESEARCH IN ACCOUNTING, 2016, 28 (02) : 1 - 16
  • [9] [Anonymous], 1997, Global Reporting Initiative
  • [10] [Anonymous], 2020, Sustainability Disclosure Database - Home