Exploring Citizen Support for Different Types of Climate Policy

被引:179
作者
Rhodes, Ekaterina [1 ]
Axsen, Jonn [1 ]
Jaccard, Mark [1 ]
机构
[1] Simon Fraser Univ, Sch Resource & Environm Management, 8888 Univ Dr, Burnaby, BC V5A 1S6, Canada
关键词
Climate policy; Citizen support; Policy support; Carbon tax; Climate regulations; Attitude-Behaviour-Context; ENVIRONMENTAL CONCERN; ENERGY POLICIES; DETERMINANTS; WILLINGNESS; INFORMATION; PERCEPTION; BEHAVIOR; VALUES; TRUST; TAXES;
D O I
10.1016/j.ecolecon.2017.02.027
中图分类号
Q14 [生态学(生物生态学)];
学科分类号
071012 ; 0713 ;
摘要
Citizen support for climate policies is considered an important criterion in climate policy-making. While there is a growing body of literature exploring factors of citizen support, most studies tend to use climate policy support as an aggregate variable, overlooking differences in support for different climate policy types. This study examines citizen support for several market-based, regulatory, and voluntary climate policies using survey data collected from a representative sample of Canadian citizens (n = 1306). Specifically, the research objectives are to (1) assess citizen support for different types of climate policies, (2) identify the key factors associated with citizen support for different,policy types, and (3) explore heterogeneity across respondents based on policy support patterns. Results indicate that most regulatory and voluntary policies receive high levels of support (83-90% of respondents), while a carbon tax receives the highest levels of opposition (47%). Regression analysis identifies several factors associated with citizen support, including values, trust, and household features. However, only a few factors are consistently associated with support across policy types, including being concerned about climate change, having trust in scientists, and being female. Other significant factors are unique to different policy types. Cluster analysis identifies four distinct respondent clusters based on policy support. (C) 2017 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:56 / 69
页数:14
相关论文
共 49 条
[1]   THE THEORY OF PLANNED BEHAVIOR [J].
AJZEN, I .
ORGANIZATIONAL BEHAVIOR AND HUMAN DECISION PROCESSES, 1991, 50 (02) :179-211
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2005, SUSTAIN DEV RES NETW
[3]   Preferences for change: Do individuals prefer voluntary actions, soft regulations, or hard regulations to decrease fossil fuel consumption? [J].
Attari, Shahzeen Z. ;
Schoen, Mary ;
Davidson, Cliff I. ;
DeKay, Michael L. ;
de Bruin, Waendi Bruine ;
Dawes, Robyn ;
Small, Mitchell J. .
ECOLOGICAL ECONOMICS, 2009, 68 (06) :1701-1710
[4]   Incentives, morality, or habit? Predicting students' car use for university routes with the models of Ajzen, Schwartz, and Triandis [J].
Bamberg, S ;
Schmidt, P .
ENVIRONMENT AND BEHAVIOR, 2003, 35 (02) :264-285
[5]   Effects of civil society involvement on popular legitimacy of global environmental governance [J].
Bernauer, Thomas ;
Gampfer, Robert .
GLOBAL ENVIRONMENTAL CHANGE-HUMAN AND POLICY DIMENSIONS, 2013, 23 (02) :439-449
[6]  
Caplan B., 2007, THE MYTH OF THE RATI
[7]  
Castelfranchi C., 2010, Trust Theory: A Socio-Cognitive and Computational Model, DOI DOI 10.1002/9780470519851
[8]   Salience and Taxation: Theory and Evidence [J].
Chetty, Raj ;
Looney, Adam ;
Kroft, Kory .
AMERICAN ECONOMIC REVIEW, 2009, 99 (04) :1145-1177
[9]   Internal and external influences on pro-environmental behavior: Participation in a green electricity program [J].
Clark, CF ;
Kotchen, MJ ;
Moore, MR .
JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2003, 23 (03) :237-246
[10]   New information and social trust: Asymmetry and perseverance of attributions about hazard managers [J].
Cvetkovich, G ;
Siegrist, M ;
Murray, R ;
Tragesser, S .
RISK ANALYSIS, 2002, 22 (02) :359-367