Ethical Theories and the Transparency Condition

被引:4
作者
Brannmark, Johan [1 ]
机构
[1] Lund Univ, Dept Philosophy, S-22222 Lund, Sweden
关键词
Ethics; Methodology; Moral psychology; Practicality; Transparency; CONSEQUENTIALISM;
D O I
10.1007/s10677-009-9160-z
中图分类号
B [哲学、宗教];
学科分类号
01 ; 0101 ;
摘要
Following John Rawls, writers like Bernard Williams and Christine Korsgaard have suggested that a transparency condition should be put on ethical theories. The exact nature of such a condition and its implications is however not anything on which there is any consensus. It is argued here that the ultimate rationale of transparency conditions is epistemic rather than substantively moral, but also that it clearly connects to substantive concerns about moral psychology. Finally, it is argued that once a satisfactory form of the transparency condition is formulated, then, at least among the main contenders within ethical theory, it speaks in favor of a broadly Aristotelian approach to ethical theorizing.
引用
收藏
页码:449 / 462
页数:14
相关论文
共 26 条
  • [1] [Anonymous], 1989, CONSTRUCTIONS REASON
  • [2] Baron Marcia., 1995, KANTIAN ETHICS ALMOS
  • [3] Bradley F.H., 1927, ETHICAL STUDIES
  • [4] Moral Perception
    Chappell, Timothy
    [J]. PHILOSOPHY, 2008, 83 (326) : 421 - 437
  • [5] Dancy Jonathan., 1993, MORAL REASONS
  • [6] Hare RM., 1981, MORAL THINKING ITS L, DOI DOI 10.1093/0198246609.001.0001
  • [7] HERMAN B, 1996, ARISTOTLE KANT STOIC
  • [8] Herman Barbara., 1993, The Practice of Moral Judgment
  • [9] Hursthouse R., 2001, VIRTUE ETHICS, DOI DOI 10.1093/0199247994.001.0001
  • [10] Irwin T.H., 1999, ARISTOTLE NICOMACHEA, V2nd