College Students Solving Chemistry Problems: A Theoretical Model of Expertise

被引:56
作者
Taasoobshirazi, Gita [1 ]
Glynn, Shawn M. [2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Nevada, Dept Educ Psychol, Las Vegas, NV 89154 USA
[2] Univ Georgia, Dept Educ Psychol & Instruct Technol, Athens, GA 30602 USA
[3] Univ Georgia, Dept Math & Sci Educ, Athens, GA 30602 USA
关键词
chemistry; problem solving; conceptualization; self-efficacy; strategy; cognitive science; statistics/multivariate; SELF-EFFICACY; NONSCIENCE MAJORS; FIT INDEXES; SCIENCE; ACHIEVEMENT; REPRESENTATIONS; CLASSIFICATION; EXPLANATION; PERFORMANCE; EXPERIENCES;
D O I
10.1002/tea.20301
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
A model of expertise in chemistry problem solving was tested on undergraduate science majors enrolled in a chemistry course. The model was based on Anderson's Adaptive Control of Thought-Rational (ACT-R) theory. The model shows how conceptualization, self-efficacy, and strategy interact and contribute to the successful solution of quantitative, well-defined chemistry problems in the areas of stoichiometry, thermochemistry, and properties of solutions. A statistical path analysis and students' explanations Supported the model and indicated that the students' problem conceptualization and chemistry self-efficacy influenced their strategy use, which, in turn, strongly influenced their problem-solving success. The implication of these findings for future research and developing students' expertise in chemistry problem solving is that it strategy is advantageous when it is built on a foundation of conceptual knowledge and chemistry self-efficacy. (C) 2009 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Res Sci Teach 46: 1070-1089, 2009
引用
收藏
页码:1070 / 1089
页数:20
相关论文
共 75 条
[1]   MOTIVATION AND STRATEGY USE IN SCIENCE - INDIVIDUAL-DIFFERENCES AND CLASSROOM EFFECTS [J].
ANDERMAN, EM ;
YOUNG, AJ .
JOURNAL OF RESEARCH IN SCIENCE TEACHING, 1994, 31 (08) :811-831
[2]   PROBLEM-SOLVING AND LEARNING [J].
ANDERSON, JR .
AMERICAN PSYCHOLOGIST, 1993, 48 (01) :35-44
[3]  
Anderson JR, 2002, COGNITIVE SCI, V26, P85, DOI 10.1207/s15516709cog2601_3
[4]  
Anderson JR., 2005, COGNITIVE PSYCHOL IT
[5]  
[Anonymous], 1995, L PAULING HIS OWN WO
[6]   Negative self-efficacy and goal effects revisited [J].
Bandura, A ;
Locke, EA .
JOURNAL OF APPLIED PSYCHOLOGY, 2003, 88 (01) :87-99
[7]   Social cognitive theory: An agentic perspective [J].
Bandura, A .
ANNUAL REVIEW OF PSYCHOLOGY, 2001, 52 :1-26
[8]  
BLOOM RDS, 2003, J RES SCI TEACH, V40, P922
[9]  
Bodner G., 2003, CHEM ED RES BASED PR, V17, P235
[10]  
Bodner G.M., 2003, University Chemistry Education, V7, P37