The heterogeneity of housing-tenure choice in urban China: A case study based in Guangzhou

被引:27
|
作者
Chen, Guo [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Michigan State Univ, Dept Geog, E Lansing, MI 48824 USA
[2] Michigan State Univ, Global Urban Studies Program, E Lansing, MI 48824 USA
关键词
differentiation; homeownership; housing-tenure choice; inequality; urban China; PROPERTY-RIGHTS; HOME OWNERSHIP; MARKET; HOMEOWNERSHIP; TRANSITION; PARADOX; REFORM; POLICY; STATE; MODEL;
D O I
10.1177/0042098015571822
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
This paper investigates the heterogeneity of housing-tenure choice in the city of Guangzhou based on a household survey. Using methods of finite mixture regression, we identified three groups with distinct housing-tenure choice subprocesses, which we labelled as the urban elites', the native plebeians' and the lower masses', accordingly. The urban elites group includes affluent local urban residents, migrants from other cities and privileged citizens such as state employees and Communist Party members. Housing-tenure choice among the urban elites positively correlates with marital status, age and education. The native plebeians group is comprised of less affluent local residents, including those with rural Hukou status. They have the highest homeownership rate among the three groups and their housing-tenure choice positively correlates with household size and income. The majority of the lower masses are migrants from rural areas. They are mostly renters, although household size was found to be a significant predictor of homeownership. Institutional factors such as Hukou status, Party membership and state employment affect tenure outcomes for both the urban elites and the lower masses, but not for the native plebeians. These findings show the correspondence between housing-tenure choice subprocesses and socioeconomic differentiation, and suggest a need to create housing policies tailored for specific housing groups.
引用
收藏
页码:957 / 977
页数:21
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] The External Characteristics and Mechanism of Urban Road Corridors to Agglomeration: Case Study for Guangzhou, China
    Qi, Luhui
    Jia, Liqi
    Luo, Yubin
    Chen, Yuanyi
    Peng, Minggang
    LAND, 2022, 11 (07)
  • [22] Housing Problems in Chinese Urban Areas, Using Wuhan as a Case Study
    Cai, Wenjie
    PROCEEDINGS OF 2010 INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE OF ASIA PACIFIC NETWORK FOR HOUSING RESEARCH: HOUSING AFFORDABILITY, SUSTAINABILITY AND LIVABILITY: TOWARDS A COMPARATIVE APPROACH, 2010, : 104 - 128
  • [23] Social Sustainability and Redevelopment of Urban Villages in China: A Case Study of Guangzhou
    Wu, Fan
    Li, Ling-Hin
    Han, Sue Yurim
    SUSTAINABILITY, 2018, 10 (07)
  • [24] Housing inequalities under market deepening: the case of Guangzhou, China
    Li, Si-ming
    ENVIRONMENT AND PLANNING A-ECONOMY AND SPACE, 2012, 44 (12): : 2852 - 2866
  • [25] Assessing Housing Affordability in Post-reform China: A Case Study of Shanghai
    Chen, Jie
    Hao, Qianjin
    Stephens, Mark
    HOUSING STUDIES, 2010, 25 (06) : 877 - 901
  • [26] Case Study on Cultural Industry Empowerment in Urban Renewal: A Focus on Guangzhou, China
    Ouyang, Yifei
    Bai, Xiaohe
    Wang, Xingci
    Chen, Yalin
    Huang, Guoshen
    Xie, Dixiang
    SUSTAINABILITY, 2025, 17 (02)
  • [27] Does Rent Deregulation Influence Housing Tenure Choice? The Case of the Czech Republic
    Spalkova, Dagmar
    Spalek, Jiri
    EKONOMICKY CASOPIS, 2014, 62 (07): : 692 - 708
  • [28] Perceived security of tenure and housing consolidation in informal settlements: case studies from urban Fiji
    Kiddie, Gabriel Luke
    PACIFIC ECONOMIC BULLETIN, 2010, 25 (03): : 193 - 214
  • [29] Housing tenure choice and socio-economic integration of migrants in rising cities of China
    Zou, Jing
    Deng, Xiaojun
    CHINA ECONOMIC REVIEW, 2022, 74
  • [30] CONVR2006 housing tenure choice in Hangzhou City of China: Logit analysis
    Yu Xiaofen
    Xu Shijie
    Proceedings of 2006 International Conference on Construction & Real Estate Management, Vols 1 and 2: COLLABORATION AND DEVELOPMENT IN CONSTRUCTION AND REAL ESTATE, 2006, : 1518 - 1525