Open Empirical and Methodological Issues in the Individualism-Holism Debate

被引：11

作者：

Kincaid, Harold ^{[1
]}

机构：

[1] Univ Cape Town, Sch Econ, ZA-7701 Cape Town, South Africa

来源：

PHILOSOPHY OF SCIENCE | 2015年 / 82卷 / 05期

关键词：

D O I：

10.1086/683445

中图分类号：

N09 [自然科学史]; B [哲学、宗教];

学科分类号：

01 ; 0101 ; 010108 ; 060207 ; 060305 ; 0712 ;

摘要：

I first briefly argue that some issues in the individualism-holism debate have been fairly clearly settled and others are still plagued by unclarity. The main argument of the article is that there is a set of clear empirical issues around the holism-individualism debate that are central problems in current social science research. Those include questions about when we can be holist and how individualist we can be in social explanation.

引用

页码：1127 / 1138

页数：12

共 22 条

[1] [Anonymous], 2012, AFFLUENCE INFLUENCE, DOI [DOI 10.2307/J.CTT7S1JN, 10.2307/j.ctt7s1jn]
[2] [Anonymous], 1981, Reason, Truth and History
[3] [Anonymous], 2004, ELGAR COMPANION EC P
[4] [Anonymous], 1974, Synthese, DOI [DOI 10.1007/BF00485230, 10.1007/bf00485230]
[5] Binmore K.G., 2007, DOES GAME THEORY WOR
[6] Bowles S., 2006, Microeconomics: Behavior, Institutions, and Evolution
[7] CONSTRUCT VALIDITY IN PSYCHOLOGICAL TESTS
CRONBACH, LJ
MEEHL, PE
[J]. PSYCHOLOGICAL BULLETIN, 1955, 52 (04) : 281 - 302
[8] Demeulenaere P., 2013, ANAL NARRATIVES SOCI
[9] Domhoff WG, 2013, WHO RULES AM
[10] Elster Jon., 1983, EXPLAINING TECHNICAL

← 1 2 3 →