Bias in Self-reported Prepregnancy Weight Across Maternal and Clinical Characteristics

被引:16
|
作者
Sharma, Andrea J. [1 ,3 ]
Bulkley, Joanna E. [2 ]
Stoneburner, Ashley B. [2 ]
Dandamudi, Padmavati [2 ]
Leo, Michael [2 ]
Callaghan, Williams M. [1 ]
Vesco, Kimberly K. [2 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Ctr Dis Control & Prevent, Div Reprod Hlth, Natl Ctr Chron Dis Prevent & Hlth Promot, Atlanta, GA 30329 USA
[2] Kaiser Permanente Ctr Hlth Res, Portland, OR USA
[3] US Publ Hlth Serv Commissioned Corps, Atlanta, GA 30329 USA
[4] Kaiser Permanente Northwest, Dept Obstet Sr Gynecol, Portland, OR USA
关键词
Pregnancy; Body weights and measures; Body mass index; Gestational weight gain; Validation studies; GAIN; PREGNANCY; ASSOCIATION; DELIVERY;
D O I
10.1007/s10995-021-03149-9
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
Objectives Prepregnancy body mass index (BMI) and gestational weight gain (GWG) are known determinants of maternal and child health; calculating both requires an accurate measure of prepregnancy weight. We compared self-reported prepregnancy weight to measured weights to assess reporting bias by maternal and clinical characteristics. Methods We conducted a retrospective cohort study among pregnant women using electronic health records (EHR) data from Kaiser Permanente Northwest, a non-profit integrated health care system in Oregon and southwest Washington State. We identified women age >= 18 years who were pregnant between 2000 and 2010 with self-reported prepregnancy weight, >= 2 measured weights between <= 365-days-prior-to and <= 42-days-after conception, and measured height in their EHR. We compared absolute and relative difference between self-reported weight and two "gold-standards": (1) weight measured closest to conception, and (2) usual weight (mean of weights measured 6-months-prior-to and <= 42-days-after conception). Generalized-estimating equations were used to assess predictors of misreport controlling for covariates, which were obtained from the EHR or linkage to birth certificate. Results Among the 16,227 included pregnancies, close agreement (+/- 1 kg or <= 2%) between self-reported and closest-measured weight was 44% and 59%, respectively. Overall, self-reported weight averaged 1.3 kg (SD 3.8) less than measured weight. Underreporting was higher among women with elevated BMI category, late prenatal care entry, and pregnancy outcome other than live/stillbirth (p < .05). Using self-reported weight, BMI was correctly classified for 91% of pregnancies, but ranged from 70 to 98% among those with underweight or obesity, respectively. Results were similar using usual weight as gold standard. Conclusions for Practice Accurate measure of prepregnancy weight is essential for clinical guidance and surveillance efforts that monitor maternal health and evaluate public-health programs. Identification of characteristics associated with misreport of self-reported weight can inform understanding of bias when assessing the influence of prepregnancy BMI or GWG on health outcomes.
引用
收藏
页码:1242 / 1253
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Association Between Self-reported Prenatal Cannabis Use and Maternal, Perinatal, and Neonatal Outcomes
    Corsi, Daniel J.
    Walsh, Laura
    Weiss, Deborah
    Hsu, Helen
    El-Chaar, Darine
    Hawken, Steven
    Fell, Deshayne B.
    Walker, Mark
    JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 2019, 322 (02): : 145 - 152
  • [32] Relationship between Self-Reported Maternal Substance Abuse and Adverse Outcomes in the Premature Newborn
    Viteri, Oscar A.
    Mendez-Figueroa, Hector
    Pedroza, Claudia
    Leon, Mateo G.
    Sibai, Baha M.
    Chauhan, Suneet P.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PERINATOLOGY, 2016, 33 (02) : 165 - 171
  • [33] Validity of self-reported height and weight in women of reproductive age
    Huber, Larissa R. Brunner
    MATERNAL AND CHILD HEALTH JOURNAL, 2007, 11 (02) : 137 - 144
  • [34] Body weight and obesity in adults and self-reported abuse in childhood
    DF Williamson
    TJ Thompson
    RF Anda
    WH Dietz
    V Felitti
    International Journal of Obesity, 2002, 26 : 1075 - 1082
  • [35] Validity of self-reported weight and height: the Goiania study, Brazil
    Gondim Peixoto, Maria do Rosario
    D'Aquino Benicio, Maria Helena
    Brandao Veiga Jardim, Paulo Cesar
    REVISTA DE SAUDE PUBLICA, 2006, 40 (06): : 1065 - 1072
  • [36] Body weight and obesity in adults and self-reported abuse in childhood
    Williamson, DF
    Thompson, TJ
    Anda, RF
    Dietz, WH
    Felitti, V
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF OBESITY, 2002, 26 (08) : 1075 - 1082
  • [37] Validity of self-reported height and weight in a Japanese workplace population
    Wada, K
    Tamakoshi, K
    Tsunekawa, T
    Otsuka, R
    Zhang, H
    Murata, C
    Nagasawa, N
    Matsushita, K
    Sugiura, K
    Yatsuya, H
    Toyoshima, H
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF OBESITY, 2005, 29 (09) : 1093 - 1099
  • [38] Accuracy and reliability of self-reported weight and height in the Sister Study
    Lin, Cynthia J.
    DeRoo, Lisa A.
    Jacobs, Sara R.
    Sandler, Dale P.
    PUBLIC HEALTH NUTRITION, 2012, 15 (06) : 989 - 999
  • [39] Validity of self-reported weight and height in the French GAZEL cohort
    I Niedhammer
    I Bugel
    S Bonenfant
    M Goldberg
    A Leclerc
    International Journal of Obesity, 2000, 24 : 1111 - 1118
  • [40] Accuracy of self-reported weight in the Women's Health Initiative
    Luo, Juhua
    Thomson, Cynthia A.
    Hendryx, Michael
    Tinker, Lesley F.
    Manson, Joann E.
    Li, Yueyao
    Nelson, Dorothy A.
    Vitolins, Mara Z.
    Seguin, Rebecca A.
    Eaton, Charles B.
    Wactawski-Wende, Jean
    Margolis, Karen L.
    PUBLIC HEALTH NUTRITION, 2019, 22 (06) : 1019 - 1028