Bias in Self-reported Prepregnancy Weight Across Maternal and Clinical Characteristics

被引:16
|
作者
Sharma, Andrea J. [1 ,3 ]
Bulkley, Joanna E. [2 ]
Stoneburner, Ashley B. [2 ]
Dandamudi, Padmavati [2 ]
Leo, Michael [2 ]
Callaghan, Williams M. [1 ]
Vesco, Kimberly K. [2 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Ctr Dis Control & Prevent, Div Reprod Hlth, Natl Ctr Chron Dis Prevent & Hlth Promot, Atlanta, GA 30329 USA
[2] Kaiser Permanente Ctr Hlth Res, Portland, OR USA
[3] US Publ Hlth Serv Commissioned Corps, Atlanta, GA 30329 USA
[4] Kaiser Permanente Northwest, Dept Obstet Sr Gynecol, Portland, OR USA
关键词
Pregnancy; Body weights and measures; Body mass index; Gestational weight gain; Validation studies; GAIN; PREGNANCY; ASSOCIATION; DELIVERY;
D O I
10.1007/s10995-021-03149-9
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
Objectives Prepregnancy body mass index (BMI) and gestational weight gain (GWG) are known determinants of maternal and child health; calculating both requires an accurate measure of prepregnancy weight. We compared self-reported prepregnancy weight to measured weights to assess reporting bias by maternal and clinical characteristics. Methods We conducted a retrospective cohort study among pregnant women using electronic health records (EHR) data from Kaiser Permanente Northwest, a non-profit integrated health care system in Oregon and southwest Washington State. We identified women age >= 18 years who were pregnant between 2000 and 2010 with self-reported prepregnancy weight, >= 2 measured weights between <= 365-days-prior-to and <= 42-days-after conception, and measured height in their EHR. We compared absolute and relative difference between self-reported weight and two "gold-standards": (1) weight measured closest to conception, and (2) usual weight (mean of weights measured 6-months-prior-to and <= 42-days-after conception). Generalized-estimating equations were used to assess predictors of misreport controlling for covariates, which were obtained from the EHR or linkage to birth certificate. Results Among the 16,227 included pregnancies, close agreement (+/- 1 kg or <= 2%) between self-reported and closest-measured weight was 44% and 59%, respectively. Overall, self-reported weight averaged 1.3 kg (SD 3.8) less than measured weight. Underreporting was higher among women with elevated BMI category, late prenatal care entry, and pregnancy outcome other than live/stillbirth (p < .05). Using self-reported weight, BMI was correctly classified for 91% of pregnancies, but ranged from 70 to 98% among those with underweight or obesity, respectively. Results were similar using usual weight as gold standard. Conclusions for Practice Accurate measure of prepregnancy weight is essential for clinical guidance and surveillance efforts that monitor maternal health and evaluate public-health programs. Identification of characteristics associated with misreport of self-reported weight can inform understanding of bias when assessing the influence of prepregnancy BMI or GWG on health outcomes.
引用
收藏
页码:1242 / 1253
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Bias in Self-reported Prepregnancy Weight Across Maternal and Clinical Characteristics
    Andrea J. Sharma
    Joanna E. Bulkley
    Ashley B. Stoneburner
    Padmavati Dandamudi
    Michael Leo
    Williams M. Callaghan
    Kimberly K. Vesco
    Maternal and Child Health Journal, 2021, 25 : 1242 - 1253
  • [2] Validity of Prepregnancy Weight Status Estimated from Self-reported Height and Weight
    Shin, Dayeon
    Chung, Hwan
    Weatherspoon, Lorraine
    Song, Won O.
    MATERNAL AND CHILD HEALTH JOURNAL, 2014, 18 (07) : 1667 - 1674
  • [3] Bias in Self-Reported Height and Weight in Preadolescents
    Seghers, Jan
    Claessens, Albrecht L.
    JOURNAL OF PEDIATRICS, 2010, 157 (06) : 911 - 916
  • [4] Validity of self-reported height and weight and predictors of bias in adolescents
    Elgar, FJ
    Roberts, C
    Tudor-Smith, C
    Moore, L
    JOURNAL OF ADOLESCENT HEALTH, 2005, 37 (05) : 371 - 375
  • [5] The accuracy of self-reported pregnancy-related weight: a systematic review
    Headen, I.
    Cohen, A. K.
    Mujahid, M.
    Abrams, B.
    OBESITY REVIEWS, 2017, 18 (03) : 350 - 369
  • [6] Agreement between self-reported pre-pregnancy weight and measured first-trimester weight in Brazilian women
    Bousquet Carrilho, Thais Rangel
    Rasmussen, Kathleen M.
    Farias, Dayana Rodrigues
    Freitas Costa, Nathalia Cristina
    Batalha, Monica Araujo
    Reichenheim, Michael E.
    Ohuma, Eric O.
    Hutcheon, Jennifer A.
    Kac, Gilberto
    BMC PREGNANCY AND CHILDBIRTH, 2020, 20 (01)
  • [7] Validity of self-reported pregnancy delivery weight: An analysis of the 1988 National Maternal and Infant Health Survey
    Schieve, LA
    Perry, GS
    Cogswell, ME
    Scanlon, KS
    Rosenberg, D
    Carmichael, S
    Ferre, C
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF EPIDEMIOLOGY, 1999, 150 (09) : 947 - 956
  • [8] The Association Between Antenatal Maternal Self-reported Substance Use, Maternal Characteristics, and Obstetrical Variables
    Berra, Alexandra
    Kamo, Shota
    Mohnot, Sopan
    Rosselot, Jessica
    Suire, Andrew
    Stafford, Joshua
    Hagan, Joseph
    Stafford, Irene
    JOURNAL OF ADDICTION MEDICINE, 2019, 13 (06) : 464 - 469
  • [9] SELF-REPORTED WEIGHT AND HEIGHT
    ROWLAND, ML
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF CLINICAL NUTRITION, 1990, 52 (06) : 1125 - 1133
  • [10] Agreement between self-reported pre-pregnancy weight and measured first-trimester weight in Brazilian women
    Thaís Rangel Bousquet Carrilho
    Kathleen M. Rasmussen
    Dayana Rodrigues Farias
    Nathalia Cristina Freitas Costa
    Mônica Araújo Batalha
    Michael E. Reichenheim
    Eric O. Ohuma
    Jennifer A. Hutcheon
    Gilberto Kac
    BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth, 20