Language function distribution in left-handers: A navigated transcranial magnetic stimulation study

被引:10
作者
Tussis, Lorena [1 ]
Sollmann, Nico [1 ,2 ]
Boeckh-Behrens, Tobias [3 ]
Meyer, Bernhard [1 ]
Krieg, Sandro M. [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Tech Univ Munich, Klinikum Rechts Isar, Dept Neurosurg, Ismaninger Str 22, D-81675 Munich, Germany
[2] Tech Univ Munich, Klinikum Rechts Isar, TUM Neuroimaging Ctr, Ismaninger Str 22, D-81675 Munich, Germany
[3] Tech Univ Munich, Klinikum Rechts Isar, Dept Radiol, Neuroradiol Sect, Ismaninger Str 22, D-81675 Munich, Germany
关键词
Cortical mapping; Language; Left-handedness; Navigated brain stimulation; Object naming; Transcranial magnetic stimulation; RIGHT-HEMISPHERE; BROCAS-AREA; CORTICAL STIMULATION; SPEECH ARREST; NAMING ERRORS; BRAIN; LATERALIZATION; HANDEDNESS; DOMINANCE; ORGANIZATION;
D O I
10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2016.01.010
中图分类号
B84 [心理学]; C [社会科学总论]; Q98 [人类学];
学科分类号
03 ; 0303 ; 030303 ; 04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
Recent studies suggest that in left-handers, the right hemisphere (RH) is more involved in language function when compared to right-handed subjects. Since data on lesion-based approaches is lacking, we aimed to investigate language distribution of left-handers by repetitive navigated transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS). Thus, rTMS was applied to the left hemisphere (LH) and RH in 15 healthy left-handers during an object-naming task, and resulting naming errors were categorized. Then, we calculated error rates (ERs=number of errors per number of stimulations) for both hemispheres separately and defined a laterality score as the quotient of the LH ER RH ER through the LH ER + RH ER (abbreviated as (L-R)/(L+R)). In this context, (L-R)/(L+R)> 0 indicates that the LH is dominant, whereas (L-R)/(L+R) <0 shows that the RH is dominant. No significant difference in ERs was found between hemispheres (all errors: mean LH 18.0 +/- 11.7%, mean RH 18.1 +/- 12.2%, p=0.94; all errors without hesitation: mean LH 12.4 +/- 9.8%, mean RH 12.9 +/- 10.0%, p=0.65; no responses: mean LH 9.3 +/- 9.2%, mean RH 11.5 +/- 10.3%, p=0.84). However, a significant difference between the results of (L-R)/(L+R) of left-handers and right-handers (source data of another study) for all errors (mean 0.01 +/- 0.14 vs. 0.19 +/- 0.20, p=0.0019) and all errors without hesitation (mean -0.02 +/- 0.20 vs. 0.19 +/- 0.28, p=0.0051) was revealed, whereas the comparison for no responses did not show a significant difference (mean: -0.004 +/- 0.27 vs. 0.09 +/- 0.44, p=0.64). Accordingly, left-handers present a comparatively equal language distribution across both hemispheres with language dominance being nearly equally distributed between hemispheres in contrast to right-handers. (C) 2016 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:65 / 73
页数:9
相关论文
共 54 条
[1]  
Broca Paul, 1861, Bulletin et Memoires de La Societe Anatomique de Paris, V6, P330, DOI DOI 10.1093/ACPROF:OSO/9780195177640.003.0018
[2]   Homotopic organization of essential language sites in right and bilateral cerebral hemispheric dominance Clinical article [J].
Chang, Edward F. ;
Wang, Doris D. ;
Perry, David W. ;
Barbaro, Nicholas M. ;
Berger, Mitchel S. .
JOURNAL OF NEUROSURGERY, 2011, 114 (04) :893-902
[3]   Right hand, left brain: genetic and evolutionary bases of cerebral asymmetries for language and manual action [J].
Corballis, Michael C. ;
Badzakova-Trajkov, Gjurgjica ;
Haeberling, Isabelle S. .
WILEY INTERDISCIPLINARY REVIEWS-COGNITIVE SCIENCE, 2012, 3 (01) :1-17
[4]   Analysis of naming errors during cortical stimulation mapping: Implications for models of language representation [J].
Corina, David P. ;
Loudermilk, Brandon C. ;
Detwiler, Landon ;
Martin, Richard F. ;
Brinkley, James F. ;
Ojemann, George .
BRAIN AND LANGUAGE, 2010, 115 (02) :101-112
[5]   A theory of the origin of cerebral asymmetry: Epigenetic variation superimposed on a fixed right-shift [J].
Crow, T. J. .
LATERALITY, 2010, 15 (03) :289-303
[6]   Functional recovery after surgical resection of low grade gliomas in eloquent brain: hypothesis of brain compensation [J].
Duffau, H ;
Capelle, L ;
Denvil, D ;
Sichez, N ;
Gatignol, P ;
Lopes, M ;
Mitchell, MC ;
Sichez, JP ;
Van Effenterre, R .
JOURNAL OF NEUROLOGY NEUROSURGERY AND PSYCHIATRY, 2003, 74 (07) :901-907
[7]   Cortico-subcortical organization of language networks in the right hemisphere: An electrostimulation study in left-handers [J].
Duffau, Hugues ;
Leroy, Marianne ;
Gatignol, Peggy .
NEUROPSYCHOLOGIA, 2008, 46 (14) :3197-3209
[8]   Localization and characterization of speech arrest during transcranial magnetic stimulation [J].
Epstein, CM ;
Meador, KJ ;
Loring, DW ;
Wright, RJ ;
Weissman, JD ;
Sheppard, S ;
Lah, JJ ;
Puhalovich, F ;
Gaitan, L ;
Davey, KR .
CLINICAL NEUROPHYSIOLOGY, 1999, 110 (06) :1073-1079
[9]   Optimum stimulus parameters for lateralized suppression of speech with magnetic brain stimulation [J].
Epstein, CM ;
Lah, JJ ;
Meador, K ;
Weissman, JD ;
Gaitan, LE ;
Dihenia, B .
NEUROLOGY, 1996, 47 (06) :1590-1593
[10]   MRI asymmetries of Broca's area: The pars triangularis and pars opercularis [J].
Foundas, AL ;
Eure, KF ;
Luevano, LF ;
Weinberger, DR .
BRAIN AND LANGUAGE, 1998, 64 (03) :282-296