Language function distribution in left-handers: A navigated transcranial magnetic stimulation study

被引:9
作者
Tussis, Lorena [1 ]
Sollmann, Nico [1 ,2 ]
Boeckh-Behrens, Tobias [3 ]
Meyer, Bernhard [1 ]
Krieg, Sandro M. [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Tech Univ Munich, Klinikum Rechts Isar, Dept Neurosurg, Ismaninger Str 22, D-81675 Munich, Germany
[2] Tech Univ Munich, Klinikum Rechts Isar, TUM Neuroimaging Ctr, Ismaninger Str 22, D-81675 Munich, Germany
[3] Tech Univ Munich, Klinikum Rechts Isar, Dept Radiol, Neuroradiol Sect, Ismaninger Str 22, D-81675 Munich, Germany
关键词
Cortical mapping; Language; Left-handedness; Navigated brain stimulation; Object naming; Transcranial magnetic stimulation; RIGHT-HEMISPHERE; BROCAS-AREA; CORTICAL STIMULATION; SPEECH ARREST; NAMING ERRORS; BRAIN; LATERALIZATION; HANDEDNESS; DOMINANCE; ORGANIZATION;
D O I
10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2016.01.010
中图分类号
B84 [心理学]; C [社会科学总论]; Q98 [人类学];
学科分类号
03 ; 0303 ; 030303 ; 04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
Recent studies suggest that in left-handers, the right hemisphere (RH) is more involved in language function when compared to right-handed subjects. Since data on lesion-based approaches is lacking, we aimed to investigate language distribution of left-handers by repetitive navigated transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS). Thus, rTMS was applied to the left hemisphere (LH) and RH in 15 healthy left-handers during an object-naming task, and resulting naming errors were categorized. Then, we calculated error rates (ERs=number of errors per number of stimulations) for both hemispheres separately and defined a laterality score as the quotient of the LH ER RH ER through the LH ER + RH ER (abbreviated as (L-R)/(L+R)). In this context, (L-R)/(L+R)> 0 indicates that the LH is dominant, whereas (L-R)/(L+R) <0 shows that the RH is dominant. No significant difference in ERs was found between hemispheres (all errors: mean LH 18.0 +/- 11.7%, mean RH 18.1 +/- 12.2%, p=0.94; all errors without hesitation: mean LH 12.4 +/- 9.8%, mean RH 12.9 +/- 10.0%, p=0.65; no responses: mean LH 9.3 +/- 9.2%, mean RH 11.5 +/- 10.3%, p=0.84). However, a significant difference between the results of (L-R)/(L+R) of left-handers and right-handers (source data of another study) for all errors (mean 0.01 +/- 0.14 vs. 0.19 +/- 0.20, p=0.0019) and all errors without hesitation (mean -0.02 +/- 0.20 vs. 0.19 +/- 0.28, p=0.0051) was revealed, whereas the comparison for no responses did not show a significant difference (mean: -0.004 +/- 0.27 vs. 0.09 +/- 0.44, p=0.64). Accordingly, left-handers present a comparatively equal language distribution across both hemispheres with language dominance being nearly equally distributed between hemispheres in contrast to right-handers. (C) 2016 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:65 / 73
页数:9
相关论文
共 54 条
  • [1] Broca Paul, 1861, Bulletin et Memoires de La Societe Anatomique de Paris, V6, P330, DOI DOI 10.1093/ACPROF:OSO/9780195177640.003.0018
  • [2] Homotopic organization of essential language sites in right and bilateral cerebral hemispheric dominance Clinical article
    Chang, Edward F.
    Wang, Doris D.
    Perry, David W.
    Barbaro, Nicholas M.
    Berger, Mitchel S.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF NEUROSURGERY, 2011, 114 (04) : 893 - 902
  • [3] Right hand, left brain: genetic and evolutionary bases of cerebral asymmetries for language and manual action
    Corballis, Michael C.
    Badzakova-Trajkov, Gjurgjica
    Haeberling, Isabelle S.
    [J]. WILEY INTERDISCIPLINARY REVIEWS-COGNITIVE SCIENCE, 2012, 3 (01) : 1 - 17
  • [4] Analysis of naming errors during cortical stimulation mapping: Implications for models of language representation
    Corina, David P.
    Loudermilk, Brandon C.
    Detwiler, Landon
    Martin, Richard F.
    Brinkley, James F.
    Ojemann, George
    [J]. BRAIN AND LANGUAGE, 2010, 115 (02) : 101 - 112
  • [5] A theory of the origin of cerebral asymmetry: Epigenetic variation superimposed on a fixed right-shift
    Crow, T. J.
    [J]. LATERALITY, 2010, 15 (03): : 289 - 303
  • [6] Functional recovery after surgical resection of low grade gliomas in eloquent brain: hypothesis of brain compensation
    Duffau, H
    Capelle, L
    Denvil, D
    Sichez, N
    Gatignol, P
    Lopes, M
    Mitchell, MC
    Sichez, JP
    Van Effenterre, R
    [J]. JOURNAL OF NEUROLOGY NEUROSURGERY AND PSYCHIATRY, 2003, 74 (07) : 901 - 907
  • [7] Cortico-subcortical organization of language networks in the right hemisphere: An electrostimulation study in left-handers
    Duffau, Hugues
    Leroy, Marianne
    Gatignol, Peggy
    [J]. NEUROPSYCHOLOGIA, 2008, 46 (14) : 3197 - 3209
  • [8] Localization and characterization of speech arrest during transcranial magnetic stimulation
    Epstein, CM
    Meador, KJ
    Loring, DW
    Wright, RJ
    Weissman, JD
    Sheppard, S
    Lah, JJ
    Puhalovich, F
    Gaitan, L
    Davey, KR
    [J]. CLINICAL NEUROPHYSIOLOGY, 1999, 110 (06) : 1073 - 1079
  • [9] Optimum stimulus parameters for lateralized suppression of speech with magnetic brain stimulation
    Epstein, CM
    Lah, JJ
    Meador, K
    Weissman, JD
    Gaitan, LE
    Dihenia, B
    [J]. NEUROLOGY, 1996, 47 (06) : 1590 - 1593
  • [10] MRI asymmetries of Broca's area: The pars triangularis and pars opercularis
    Foundas, AL
    Eure, KF
    Luevano, LF
    Weinberger, DR
    [J]. BRAIN AND LANGUAGE, 1998, 64 (03) : 282 - 296